A fast polygon inflation algorithm to compute the area of feasible solutions for three-component systems. I: Concepts and applications

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 106-116

  Sawall, Mathias ^a   Kubis, Christoph ^b   Selent, Detlef ^b   Börner, Armin ^b   Neymeyr, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR KATALYSE E V AN DER UNIVERSITÄT ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Band boundaries of feasible solutions; Factor analysis; Nonnegative matrix factorization; Polygon inflation; Pure component decomposition; Spectral recovery

Indexed keywords

MATRIX ALGEBRA; MATRIX FACTORIZATION;

BAND BOUNDARY OF FEASIBLE SOLUTION; COMPONENT DECOMPOSITION; FACTORS ANALYSIS; FEASIBLE SOLUTION; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; POLYGON INFLATION; PURE COMPONENT DECOMPOSITION; PURE COMPONENTS; SPECTRAL RECOVERIES; THREE-COMPONENT SYSTEM;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 84877926469     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2498     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lawton W, Sylvestre E. Self modelling curve resolution. Technometrics 1971; 13: 617-633.
2. Borgen O, Kowalski B. An extension of the multivariate component-resolution method to three components. Anal. Chim. Acta 1985; 174(0): 1-26.
3. Rajkó R, István K. Analytical solution for determining feasible regions of self-modeling curve resolution (SMCR) method based on computational geometry. J. Chemometr. 2005; 19(8): 448-463.
4. Golshan A, Abdollahi H, Maeder M. Resolution of rotational ambiguity for three-component systems. Anal. Chem. 2011; 83(3): 836-841.
5. Golshan A, Abdollahi H, Maeder M. The reduction of rotational ambiguity in soft-modeling by introducing hard models. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012; 709(0): 32-40.
6. Tauler R. Calculation of maximum and minimum band boundaries of feasible solutions for species profiles obtained by multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemometr. 2001; 15(8): 627-646.
7. Malinowski E. Factor Analysis in Chemistry. Wiley: New York, 2002.
8. Hamilton J, Gemperline P. Mixture analysis using factor analysis. II: self-modeling curve resolution. J. Chemometr. 1990; 4(1): 1-13.
9. Maeder M, Neuhold Y. Practical Data Analysis in Chemistry. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2007.
10. Berry M, Browne M, Langville A, Pauca V, Plemmons R. Algorithms and applications for approximate nonnegative matrix factorization. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2007; 52: 155-173.
11. Gampp H, Maeder M, Meyer C, Zuberbühler D. Calculation equilibrium constants from multi-wavelength spectroscopy data-I: mathematical considerations. Talanta 1985; 32: 95-101.
12. Gemperline P, Cash E. Advantages of soft versus hard constraints in self-modeling curve resolution problems. Alternating least squares with penalty functions. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 4236-4243.
13. Haario H, Taavitsainen V. Combining soft and hard modelling in chemical kinetics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1998; 44: 77-98.
14. Juan A, Maeder M, Martínez M, Tauler R. Combining hard and soft-modelling to solve kinetic problems. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2000; 54: 123-141.
15. Neymeyr K, Sawall M, Hess D. Pure component spectral recovery and constrained matrix factorizations: concepts and applications. J. Chemometr. 2010; 24: 67-74.
16. Sawall M, Börner A, Kubis C, Selent D, Ludwig R, Neymeyr K. Model-free multivariate curve resolution combined with model-based kinetics: algorithm and applications. J. Chemometr. 2012; 26: 538-548.
17. Manne R. On the resolution problem in hyphenated chromatography. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1995; 27(1): 89-94.
18. Sawall M, Fischer C, Heller D, Neymeyr K. Reduction of the rotational ambiguity of curve resolution technqiues under partial knowledge of the factors. Complementarity and coupling theorems. J. Chemometr. 2012; 26: 526-537.
19. Abdollahi H, Maeder M, Tauler R. Calculation and meaning of feasible band boundaries in multivariate curve resolution of a two-component system. Anal. Chem. 2009; 81(6): 2115-2122.
20. Gemperline PJ. Computation of the range of feasible solutions in self-modeling curve resolution algorithms. Anal. Chem. 1999; 71(23): 5398-5404.
21. Borgen O, Davidsen N, Mingyang Z, Øyen O. The multivariate N-Component resolution problem with minimum assumptions. Microchim. Acta 1986; 89: 63-73. DOI: 10.1007/BF01207309.
22. Rajkó R. Studies on the adaptability of different Borgen norms applied in self-modeling curve resolution (SMCR) method. J. Chemometr. 2009; 23(6): 265-274.
23. Minc H. Nonnegative Matrices. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1988.
24. Golub G, Van Loan C. Matrix Computations (third edn). Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, 1996.
25. Vosough M, Mason C, Tauler R, Jalali-Heravi M, Maeder M. On rotational ambiguity in model-free analyses of multivariate data. J. Chemometr. 2006; 20(6-7): 302-310.
26. Kim H, Park H. Nonnegative matrix factorization based on alternating nonnegativity constrained least squares and active set method. SIAM J. Matrix. Anal. Appl. 2008; 30: 713-730.
27. Dennis J, Gay D, Welsch R. Algorithm 573: an adaptive nonlinear least-squares algorithm. ACM T. Math. Software 1981; 7: 369-383.
28. Kubis C, Selent D, Sawall M, Ludwig R, Neymeyr K, Baumann W, Franke R, Börner A. Exploring between the extremes:conversion dependent kinetics of phosphite-modified hydroformylation catalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18(28): 8780-8794.
29. Jaumot J, Tauler R. MCR-BANDS: a user friendly MATLAB program for the evaluation of rotation ambiguities in multivariate curve resolution. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2010; 103(2): 96-107.
30. Binstead R, Jung B, Zuberbühler A. SPECFIT/32 Global Analysis System. Spectrum Software Associates: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2000.