Neonatal transfer rate and mode of delivery from 37th week of gestation in a German perinatal center level 1

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 324-329

  Reinhard, J ^a   Hanker, L ^b   Sanger N ^b   Yuan, J ^b   Louwen, F ^b  

^a St Marienkrankenhaus Frankfurt   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

forceps; mode of delivery (caesarean section; term neonate; transfer rate to neonatal intensive care; twin; vaginal breech delivery; vaginal delivery)

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BREECH EXTRACTION; CESAREAN SECTION; GERMANY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN CARE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN PERIOD; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; TWIN PREGNANCY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 84877870225     PISSN: 00165751     EISSN: 14388804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328435     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Grisaru S., Samuelo A. Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section ("section on requesto"): Evidence based or modern vogue? Clin Perinatol: 2004; 31 409 430 (Pubitemid 39119476)
2. Wax J. R., Cartin A., Pinette M. G. et al. Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv: 2004; 59 601 616 (Pubitemid 38971773)
3. Smith G. C., Pell J. P., Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet: 2003; 362 1179 1184
4. Hannah M. E., Hannah W. J., Hewson S. A. et al. The Term Breech Trial Collaborative group Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet: 2000; 356 1375 1383
5. Morrison J. J., Rennie J. M., Milton P. J. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. BJOG: 1995; 102 101 110
6. Häger R., Daltveit A. K., Hofoss D. et al. Complications in cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 190 428 434 (Pubitemid 38249240)
7. Ecker J. L. Once a pregnancy, always a cesarean? Rationale and feasibility of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2004; 190 314 318 (Pubitemid 38249222)
8. Schindl M., Birner P., Reingrabner M. et al. Elective cesarean section vs. spontaneous delivery: a comparative study of birth experience. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand: 2003; 82 834 840 (Pubitemid 37082913)
9. Heit M., Mudd K., Culligan P. Prevention of childbirth injuries to the pelvic floor. Curr Womens Health Rep: 2001; 1 72 80
10. Harper M. A., Byington R. P., Espeland M. A. et al. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstet Gynecol: 2003; 102 273 278 (Pubitemid 36936998)
11. Bergholt T., Stenderup J. K., Vedsted-Jakobsen A. et al. Intraoperative surgical complications during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand: 2003; 82 251 256 (Pubitemid 36459733)
12. Nicoll A. E., Black C., Powls A. et al. An audit of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section at term. Scott Med J: 2004; 49 22 25 (Pubitemid 38325272)
13. Zanardo V., Simbi A. K., Franzoi M. et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr: 2004; 93 643 647 (Pubitemid 38570232)
14. Madar J., Richmond S., Hey E. Surfactant-deficient respiratory distress after elective delivery at "termo" Acta Pædiatr: 1999; 88 1244 1248
15. Kolas T., Saugstad O. D., Daltveit A. K. et al. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: Comparison of newborn infant outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 195 1538 1543 (Pubitemid 44792626)
16. Hübener C., Delius M., Deppe C. et al. Entbindung versus Prolongation der Schwangerschaft - Bedeutung des Interleukin 6 im Fruchtwasser in der Entscheidungsfindung bei vorzeitiger Wehentätigkeit und V.a. Amnioninfektionssyndrom. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 G-3
17. Reif P., Haas J., Schöll W. et al. Reduktion der operativen Entbindungsrate durch den Einsatz von Mikroblutuntersuchungen bei auffälligem CTG unter Berücksichtigung des Gestationsalters. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 P104
18. http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx-szleitlinien/015-023-S1-Vaginal-operative- Entbindungen-12-2007-12-2012.pdf last access: Feb. 2013
19. Zanardo V., Simbi A. K., Franzoi M. et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr: 2004; 93 643 647 (Pubitemid 38570232)
20. Hansen A. K., Wisborg K., Uldbjerg N. et al. Elective caesarean section and respiratory morbidity in the term and near-term neonate. Acta Obstet Gynecol: 2007; 86 389 394 (Pubitemid 46747712)
21. van den Berg A., van Elburg R. M., van Geijn H. P. et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section in term infants - A 5-year retrospective study and a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2001; 98 9 13 (Pubitemid 32758827)
22. Hales K. A., Morgan M. A., Thurnau G. R. Influence of labor and route of delivery on the frequency of respiratory morbidity in term neonates. Int J Gynecol Obstet: 1993; 43 35 40 (Pubitemid 23298534)
23. Levin E. M., Ghai V., Barton J. J. et al. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 97 439 442 (Pubitemid 32184709)
24. Devendra K., Arulkumaran S. Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Ann Acad Med Singapore: 2004; 32 577 581
25. Absolute und relative Indikationen zur Sectio caesarea. AWMF 015/054 (S1); 2008. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/015-054.html last access: Feb. 2013
26. Welsch H., Wischnik A. Müttersterblichkeit. In: Schneider H., Husslein P., Schneider K. TM. Hrsg. Die Geburtshilfe. 3. Auflage. Berlin Springer Verlag: 2006; 1049 1063
27. Simoes E., Kunz S. K., Münnich R. et al. Informed consent for cesarean delivery: method-associated morbidity gradients require the participation of pregnant women. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2010; 70 732 738
28. Hübner M., Reisenauer C., Abele H. Welchen Stellenwert hat die primäre Sectio caesarea? Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2010; 70 911 913
29. Gyhagen M., Bullarbo M., Nielsen T. F. et al. The prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG: 2012; 10.1111/j.1471-0528. 2012.03301.x
30. Rath W., Vetter K. Der Kaiserschnitt zwischen Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Schwangeren, Mangel an gesichertem Wissen und ärztlicher Entscheidung. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2002; 62 838 842
31. Nelson R. L., Fumer S. E., Westercamp M. et al. Cesarean delivery for the prevention of anal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2010; 2 CD006756
32. Reiter B., Windbichler G. Motive für den Wunsch nach einer electiven Sectio ohne medizinische Indikation. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2010; 70 P28
33. Kunkel S., Schuler S., Bauer B. et al. Gibt es Gründe für die steigende Sectiorate? Eine retrospektive Analyse der Sectiones 1995 und 2005 in der Missionsärztlichen Klinik in Würzburg. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2012; 72 P33