Six pairs of things to celebrate on International Clinical Trials Day

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Sackett, David L ^a  

^a Trout Research and Education Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; NEWBORN MORTALITY; NOTE; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUERPERAL DEPRESSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SAMPLE SIZE; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDITY;

CLINICAL TRIALS DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FORECASTING; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84877860288     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-128     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Biostatistics in Clinical Trials 2001, 241. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, Redmond CK, Colton T.
2. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension: results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA 1967, 202:116-122. 10.1001/jama.1967.03130150084015, 6072204, Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.
3. Lind J. A treatise of the scurvy. In Three Parts. Containing an Inquiry into the Nature, Causes and Cure, of that Disease. Together with a Critical and Chronological View of What has been Published on the Subject 1753, Edinburgh: A Kincaid and A Donaldson, Obtained from the James Lind Library [http://www.jameslindlibrary.org]. Accessed 9 May 2013.
4. The James Lind Alliance Tackling treatment uncertainties together [http://www.lindalliance.org/] Accessed 9 May 2013, The James Lind Alliance.
5. Vist GE, Bryant D, Somerville L, Birminghem T, Oxman AD. Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 3. MR000009.
6. Tripathy P, Nair N, Barnett S, Mahapatra R, Borghi J, Rath S, Rath S, Gope R, Mahto D, Sinha R, Lakshminarayana R, Patel V, Pagel C, Prost A, Costello A. Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes and maternal depression in Jharkhand and Orissa, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 375:1182-1192. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62042-0, 20207411.
7. Roberts I, Prieto-Merino D, Shakur H, Chalmers I, Nicholl J. Effect of consent rituals on mortality in emergency care research. Lancet 2011, 377:1071-1072. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60317-6, 21439634.
8. Christie DR, Gabriel GS, Dear K. Adverse effects of a multicentre system for ethics approval on the progress of a prospective multicentre trial of cancer treatment: how many patients die waiting?. Intern Med J 2007, 37:680-686.
9. Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board [http://oicr.on.ca/oicr-programs-and-platforms/ontario-cancer-research-ethics-board] Accessed 9 May 2013, Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board.
10. Sydes MR, Parmar MK, Mason MD, Clarke MW, Amos C, Anderson J, de Bono J, Dearnaley DP, Dwyer J, Green G, Jovic G, Ritchie AW, Russell J, Sanders K, Thalmann G, James ND. Flexible trial design in practice - stopping arms for lack-of-benefit and adding research arms mid-trial in STAMPEDE: a multi-arm multi-stage randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012, 13:168. 10.1186/1745-6215-13-168, 3466132, 22978443.
11. Jaki T. Uptake of novel statistical methods for early-phase clinical studies in the UK public sector. Clin Trials 2013, 10:344-346. 10.1177/1740774512474375, 23378484.
12. CONSORT Transparent Reporting of Trials [http://www.consort-statement.org/]. Accessed 9 May 2013, CONSORT.
13. PRISMA Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [http://www.prisma-statement.org/]. Accessed 9 May 2013, PRISMA.