Adverse effects of a multicentre system for ethics approval on the progress of a prospective multicentre trial of cancer treatment: How many patients die waiting?

Internal Medicine Journal

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 680-686

  Christie, D R H ^a   Gabriel, G S ^b   Dear, K ^c  

^a East Coast Cancer Centre   (Australia)

^b CENTRAL SYDNEY AREA HEALTH SERVICE   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Medical ethics; Radiotherapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CANCER THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CLINICAL TRIALS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL; HUMANS; MULTICENTER STUDIES; NEOPLASMS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34748866535     PISSN: 14440903     EISSN: 14455994     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01451.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR). Cancer in Australia 2001. Canberra, Australia : AIHW 2004. AIHW Cat. No.: CAN 23 (Cancer Series no. 28) [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/ 10083
2. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L et al eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2002. Bethesda : National Cancer Institute 2005 [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/ 1975_2002/results_merged/sect_02_all_sites.pdf
3. Kenny L, Lehman M Faculty of Radiation Oncology, Royal Australasian College of Radiologists. Sequential audits of unacceptable delays in radiation therapy in Australia and New Zealand. Australas Radiol 2004 48 : 29 34.
4. Christie DRH, Barton MB, Bryant G, Cheuk R, Gebski V, Hornsey D et al. Osteolymphoma (primary bone lymphoma): an Australian review of 70 cases. Aust NZ J Med 1999 29 : 214 19.
5. Roche K, Paul N, Smuck B, Whitehead M, Zee B, Pater J et al. Factors affecting workload of cancer clinical trials: results of a multi-centre study of the national cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group. J Clin Oncol 2002 20 : 545 56.
6. Dal-Re R, Espada J, Ortega R. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines. J Med Ethics 1999 25 : 219 20.
7. Apolone G, Mosconi P, Cattaneo G, Pomodoro L, Garattini S. Oncologists' opinion of ethics commitees functioning in Italy [letter]. Ann Oncol 2002 13 : 1157 60.
8. Maxwell DJ, Kaye KI. Multi-centre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course [letter]. Med J Aust 2004 181 : 460.
9. Roberts LM, Bowyer L, Homer CS, Brown MA. Multi-centre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course. Med J Aust 2004 180 : 139.
10. Jamrozik K, Kolybaba M. Are ethics committees retarding the improvement of health services in Australia. Med J Aust 1999 170 : 26 8.
11. Bruinsma FJ, Venn AJ, Skene LLC. We need a better system for multi-centre research [letter]. Med J Aust 1999 171 : 52.
12. Article 6, para 5 of the Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and Council. 2001 [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://eudract.emea.eu. int/docs/Dir2001-20_en.pdf
13. Henman MJ, Tattersall MHN, Brown RF. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multi-centre clinical research [letter]? Med J Aust 1998 169 : 283 4.
14. Silverman H, Hull SC, Sugarman J. Variability among institutional review board's decisions within the context of a multi-centre trial. Crit Care Med 2001 29 : 235 41.
15. O'Brien EA, Saltman DC, Berglund CA. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multi-centre clinical research? [letter] Med J Aust 1998 169 : 284 5.
16. Greenwood J, Holmes C, Bidewell J. Mission impossible? Collegian 2001 8 : 8 13.
17. Whiteman D. Australian research team takes on huge task. In : Flannery J, ed. Australian Medicine. Barton Australian Medical Association Ltd 2002.
18. Lowenthal RM. Outdated ethical review system impedes important research [letter]. Med J Aust 1999 171 : 51.
19. Shields L. The ethics of ethics committees - interview on ABC Science Radio National Program, 14th July 2002 [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s604355.htm
20. Chalmers D. New national guidelines for ethics committees are on the way [letter]. Med J Aust 1999 171 : 53.
21. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in research. 1999 [cited 2005 Sep and Dec]. Available from URL : http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm
22. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
23. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Note for guidance on good clinical practice [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://www.tga.gov.au/docs/html/ ich13595.htm
24. National Health and Medical Research Council. Review of National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans (1999) - First consultation draft December 2004 [cited 2004 Dec]. Available from URL : http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/issues/natstrev.htm
25. Dickson HG. Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course [letter]. Med J Aust 2004 181 : 459 60.
26. Breen KJ. Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course [letter]. Med J Aust 2004 181 8 460.
27. Gandevia SC, McKeown T, Wright MM, Briody GP, Watson JDG. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multi-centre clinical research [letter]? Med J Aust 1998 169 : 285.
28. Fielding JE, Kelly H. Ethics committees and guardianship legislation [letter]. Med J Aust 2003 179 : 390.
29. Van Essen GL, Story DA, Poustie SJ, Griffiths MMJ, Marwood CL. Natural justice and human research ethics committees: an Australian-wide survey. Med J Aust 2004 180 : 63 6.
30. Beran RG. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multi-centre clinical research? Med J Aust 1998 168 : 174 6.
31. Clarke CW. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multi-centre clinical research [letter]? Med J Aust 1998 169 : 283.
32. Jamrozik K. Good Scientists Will Deliver Good Ethics [abstract No 4]. Sydney : Clinical Oncology Society of Australia 2003.
33. Loff B, Black J. Research ethics committees: what is their contribution? Med J Aust 2004 181 : 440 41.
34. Loblay RH, Chalmers DRC. Ethics committees: is reform in order? Med J Aust 1999 170 : 9 10.
35. Van Der Weyden MB. Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course [letter]. Med J Aust 2004 181 : 460 61.
36. Jamrozik K, Heller RF, Weller DP. Lying awake worrying about asteroids. Med J Aust 2004 181 : 417 18.
37. Pearn JH. The realities of ethical review of research in Australia. Med J Aust 1999 171 : 38 9.
38. Liauw WS, Day RO. Adverse event reporting in clinical trials: room for improvement. Med J Aust 2003 179 : 426 8.
39. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for National Committee Submissions [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://www.racgp.org.au/document.asp%3Fid%20%3D%20523
40. Walsh MK, McNeil JJ, Breen KJ. Improving the governance of health research. Med J Aust 2005 182 : 468 71.
41. Christian MC, Goldberg JL, Killen JL, Abrams JS, McCabe MS, Mauer JK et al. A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. N Engl J Med 2002 346 : 1405 8.
42. Frew R. Research ethics committees: what can we learn from the Western European and United States experience? Monash Bioeth Rev 2002 20 : 61 77.
43. New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committees. Multi-region ethics committee. Ministry of Health, New Zealand Government [cited 2005 Sep]. Available from URL : http://www.newhealth.govt.nz/ethicscommittees/committees/ multi-region.htm
44. New South Wales Health. Research Ethics - Shared Scientific Assessment Scheme [cited 2007 Apr). Available from URL : http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/ healthethics/ssas.html