-
1
-
-
36249017451
-
Adaptive designs in clinical drug development: Opportunities, challenges, and scope reflections following PhRMA's November 2006 workshop
-
Krams M, Burman C-F, Dragalin V, et al. Adaptive designs in clinical drug development: Opportunities, challenges, and scope reflections following PhRMA's November 2006 workshop. J Biopharm Stat. 2007 ; 17: 957-64
-
(2007)
J Biopharm Stat
, vol.17
, pp. 957-964
-
-
Krams, M.1
Burman, C.-F.2
Dragalin, V.3
-
2
-
-
50549174560
-
The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent
-
Gehan EA. The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. J Chro Dis. 1960 ; 13: 346-53
-
(1960)
J Chro Dis
, vol.13
, pp. 346-353
-
-
Gehan, E.A.1
-
4
-
-
0024536437
-
Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials
-
Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989 ; 10: 1-10
-
(1989)
Control Clin Trials
, vol.10
, pp. 1-10
-
-
Simon, R.1
-
5
-
-
21844475901
-
Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase i clinical trials: Dose escalation with overdose control
-
Tighiouart M, Rogatko A, Babb J. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials: Dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med. 2005 ; 24: 2183-96
-
(2005)
Stat Med
, vol.24
, pp. 2183-2196
-
-
Tighiouart, M.1
Rogatko, A.2
Babb, J.3
-
6
-
-
64549124373
-
One- and two-stage design proposals for a phase II trial comparing three active treatments with control using an ordered categorical endpoint
-
Whitehead J, Jaki T. One- and two-stage design proposals for a phase II trial comparing three active treatments with control using an ordered categorical endpoint. Stat Med. 2009 ; 28: 828-47
-
(2009)
Stat Med
, vol.28
, pp. 828-847
-
-
Whitehead, J.1
Jaki, T.2
-
7
-
-
0025148278
-
Continual reassessment method: A practical design for phase i clinical trials in cancer
-
O'Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: A practical design for phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990 ; 46: 33-48
-
(1990)
Biometrics
, vol.46
, pp. 33-48
-
-
O'Quigley, J.1
Pepe, M.2
Fisher, L.3
-
8
-
-
36849035490
-
Translation of innovative designs into phase i trials
-
Rogatko A, Schoeneck D, Jonas W, et al. Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 2007 ; 25: 4982-86
-
(2007)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.25
, pp. 4982-4986
-
-
Rogatko, A.1
Schoeneck, D.2
Jonas, W.3
-
9
-
-
66849118694
-
Dose escalation methods in phase i cancer trials
-
Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer trials. J Natl Cancer I. 2009 ; 101: 708-20
-
(2009)
J Natl Cancer i
, vol.101
, pp. 708-720
-
-
Le Tourneau, C.1
Lee, J.J.2
Siu, L.L.3
-
10
-
-
85065990548
-
-
Guidance for Industry Draft guidance, February2010. Available at
-
Guidance for Industry. Adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics. Draft guidance, February2010. Available at: www.fda.gov/downloads/ Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM201790.pdf
-
Adaptive Design Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biologics
-
-
|