Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004-2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories

Accounting Forum

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 158-175

  Mahadeo, Jyoti Devi ^a   Oogarah Hanuman, Vanisha ^a   Soobaroyen, Teerooven ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAURITIUS   (Mauritius)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Emerging economy; Legitimacy theory; Social and environmental reporting; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052302786     PISSN: 01559982     EISSN: 14676303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams C.A., Harte G. The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British Banks' and retail companies' corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1998, 23(8):781-812.
2. Amran A., Devi S.S. The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal 2008, 23(4):386-404.
3. Belal A.R., Owen D. The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: An engagement-based study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2007, 20(3):472-494.
4. Belal A.R. A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal 2001, 16(5):274-289.
5. Branco M.C., Rodrigues L.L. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 83(4):685-701.
6. Brautigam D., Diolle T. Coalitions, capitalists, and credibility: Overcoming the crisis of confidence at independence in Mauritius. The Leaders, Elites and Coalitions Research Papers 2009, 4. Retrieved from Accessed 10.12.10.
7. Brennan N.M., Solomon J. Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(7):885-906.
8. Bunwaree S. Economics, conflicts and inter-culturality in a small island state: The case of Mauritius [Special issue]. Polis 2002, 9:1-19.
9. Campbell D., Craven B., Shrives P. Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2003, 16(4):558-581.
10. Campbell D., Moore G., Shrives P. Cross-sectional effects in community disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2006, 19(1):96-114.
11. Campbell D.J. Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? corporate social disclosure in marks and Spencer Plc Annual Corporate Reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum 2000, 24(1):80-100.
12. Cormier D., Gordon I.M., Magnan M. Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management's perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics 2004, 49(2):143-165.
13. De Villiers C., Van Staden C.J. Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2006, 31(8):763-781.
14. Deegan C. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):282-311.
15. Deegan C., Gordon B. A Study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 1996, 26(3):187-199.
16. Deegan C., Rankin M., Tobin J. An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997-A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):312-343.
17. Deegan C., Rankin M., Voght P. Firms' disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum 2000, 24(1):101-130.
18. Donaldson T., Preston L. The stakeholder theory of the corporation-Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(1):65-92.
19. Dowling J., Pfeffer J. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review 1975, 18(1):122-136.
20. Elijido-Ten E., Kloot L., Clarkson P. Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures: An exploratory study from a developing country. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2010, 23(8):1032-1059.
21. Eriksen T.H. Mauritian society between the ethnic and non-ethnic. The politics of ethnic consciousness 1997, Macmillan, London. C. Govers, H. Vermeulen (Eds.).
22. Fremond, O., & Gorlick, W. (2002) Corporate governance country assessment for Mauritius. Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC). World Bank.
23. Gao S.S., Heravi S., Xiao J.Z. Determinants of corporate social environmental reporting in Hong Kong: A research note. Accounting Forum 2005, 29:233-242.
24. Gray R. A re-evaluation of social, environmental and sustainability accounting: An exploration of an emerging trans-disciplinary field?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 2010, 1(1):11-32.
25. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):47-77.
26. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):78-101.
27. Gray R., Owen D., Adams C. Accounting and accountability 1996, Prentice Hall, Hemel Hampstead.
28. Guthrie J., Parker L.D. Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1990, 3:159-175.
29. Guthrie J., Cuganesan S., Ward L. Industry specific social and environmental reporting: The Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum 2008, 32(1):1-15.
30. Hackston D., Milne M.J. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1996, 9(1):77-108.
31. Haniffa R.M., Cooke T.E. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 2005, 24:340-391.
32. Holder-Webb L., Cohen J.R., Nath L., Wood D. The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 84(2):497-527.
33. Huang C.L., Kung F.H. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 96:435-451.
34. Hybels R.C. On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: A critical review and integrative theoretical model [Special issue]. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 241-245.
35. Islam M.A., Deegan C. Motivations for an organization within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(6):850-874.
36. Jamali D., Safieddine A., Rabbath M. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2008, 16(5):443-459.
37. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology 1980, Sage, New York.
38. Lindblom C.K. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Proceedings of the critical perspectives on accounting conference 1994.
39. Mahadeo, J.D., & Soobaroyen, T. (2009, June). The implementation and impact of corporate governance in Mauritius. Mauritius Research Council Research Report, Mauritius.
40. Meisenhelder T. The developmental state in Mauritius. Journal of Modern African Studies 1997, 35(2):279-297.
41. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22(4):853-886.
42. Napal G. Is bribery a culturally acceptable practice in Mauritius?. Business Ethics: A European Review 2005, 14(3):231-249.
43. National Committee on Corporate Governance Report and code on corporate governance for Mauritius 2004, Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Government of Mauritius.
44. Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1998, 23(3):265-282.
45. Newson M., Deegan C. Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting 2002, 37:183-213.
46. O'Donovan G. Environmental disclosures in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):344-371.
47. O'Dwyer B. Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):406-436.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development OECD principles of corporate governance 2004, OECD, Paris.
49. Owen D. Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(2):240-267.
50. Parker L.D. Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2005, 18(6):842-860.
51. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat World population prospects: The 2008 revision 2009, Retrieved from Accessed 25.04.10.
52. Preacher K.J. Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients 2002, Retrieved from Accessed 20.11.10.
53. Ratanajongkol S., Davey H., Low M. Corporate social reporting in Thailand: The news is all good and increasing. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management 2006, 3(1):67-83.
54. Reverte C. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 88(2):351-366.
55. Roberts R.W. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1992, 17(6):595-612.
56. Rowbottom N., Lymer A. Exploring the use of online corporate sustainability information. Accounting Forum 2009, 33(2):176-186.
57. Solomon A., Lewis L. Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 2002, 11(3):154-169.
58. Soobaroyen T., Mahadeo J.D. Selective compliance with the corporate governance code in Mauritius: Is legitimacy theory at work?. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 2008, 8:239-272.
59. Stanton P., Stanton J. Corporate annual reports: Research perspectives used. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15(4):478-500.
60. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-606.
61. Tilling M.V., Tilt C.A. The edge of legitimacy: Voluntary social and environmental reporting in Rothmans' 1956-1999 annual reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2010, 23(1):55-81.
62. Tilt C.A. The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1994, 7(4):47-70.
63. Tsang E.W.K. A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: The case of the banking, food and beverages industries. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1998, 11(5):624-635.
64. Ullman A.E. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review 1985, 10(3):540-557.
65. Wilmshurst T., Frost G. Corporate environmental performance. A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2000, 13(1):10-26.