Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?

Accounting Forum

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 187-204

  Bouten, Lies ^a   Everaert, Patricia ^a   Van Liedekerke, Luc ^b,c   De Moor, Lieven ^d   Christiaens, Johan ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d HOGESCHOOL UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Accountability; Comprehensive reporting; Content analysis; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Disclosure; Global Reporting Initiative

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052303004     PISSN: 01559982     EISSN: 14676303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adams C., Harte G. Making discrimination visible: The potential for social accounting. Accounting Forum 2000, 24(1):56-79.
2. Adams C.A. The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2004, 17(5):731-757.
3. Adams, C. A., Hill, W. Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1995). Environmental, employee and ethical reporting in Europe. London: ACCA Research Report, No. 41.
4. Adams C.A., Hill W.Y., Roberts C.B. Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour?. British Accounting Review 1998, 30(1):1-21.
5. Al-Tuwaijri S.A., Christensen T.E., Hughes K.E.I.I. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2004, 29(5-6):447-471.
6. Archel P., Fernández M., Larrinaga C. The organizational and operational boundaries of triple bottom line reporting: A survey. Environmental Management 2008, 41(1):106-117.
7. Ball A., Owen D.L., Gray R. External transparency or internal capture? The role of third-party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 2000, 9(1):1-23.
8. Beattie V., Thomson S.J. Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures. Accounting Forum 2007, 31(2):129-163.
9. Beck A.C., Campbell D., Shrives P.J. Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. British Accounting Review 2010, 42(3):207-222.
10. Branco M.C., Rodrigues L.L. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 83(4):685-701.
11. Campbell D.J. Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum 2000, 24(1):80-100.
12. Campbell D.J. A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies-A research note. British Accounting Review 2004, 36(1):107-117.
13. Chapman R., Milne M.J. The triple bottom line: How New Zealand companies measure up. Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business 2004, 11(2):37-50.
14. Cormier D., Magnan M., Van Velthoven B. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions?. European Accounting Review 2005, 14(1):3-39.
15. Cowen S.S., Ferreri L.B., Parker L.D. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1987, 12(2):111-122.
16. Dando N., Swift T. Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 44(2-3):195-200.
17. Day R., Woodward T. Disclosure of information about employees in the directors' report of UK published financial statements: Substantive or symbolic. Accounting Forum 2004, 28(1):43-59.
18. Deegan C. Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):282-311.
19. Deegan C., Gordon B. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 1996, 26(3):187-199.
20. Deegan C., Rankin M. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1996, 9(2):52-69.
21. Deegan C., Rankin M. The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1997, 10(4):562-583.
22. Deegan C., Rankin M. The environmental reporting expectations gap: Australian evidence. British Accounting Review 1999, 31(3):313-346.
23. de Villiers C., van Staden C.J. Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2006, 31(8):763-781.
24. de Villiers C., van Staden C.J. Shareholders' requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison. British Accounting Review 2010, 42(4):227-240.
25. Dowling J., Pfeffer J. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review 1975, 18(1):122-136.
26. European Parliament and Council. (2003). Fourth Council Directive on the annual accounts of certain types of companies: Art. 46 amended by Directive 2003/51/EC. Accessed 20 June 2010. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do%3Furi=CONSLEG%3A%201978L0660%3A20070101%3AEN%3APDF.
27. Farneti F., Guthrie J. Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report. Accounting Forum 2009, 33(2):89-98.
28. Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB). (2007). Dynamiek MVO versterken, niet fnuiken. Brussels: Focus, No. 17.
29. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines G3. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
30. Gray R. Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation. Whose value? Whose creation?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2006, 19(6):793-819.
31. Gray R., Dey C., Owen D., Evans R., Zadek S. Struggling with the praxis of social accounting. Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1997, 10(3):325-364.
32. Gray R., Javad M., Power D.M., Sinclair C.D. Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 2001, 28(3-4):327-356.
33. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):78-101.
34. Gray R., Owen D., Adams C. Accounting & accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting 1996, Prentice Hall, London.
35. Guthrie J., Abeysekera I. Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: What is new?. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting 2006, 10(2):114-126.
36. Guthrie J., Cuganesan S., Ward L. Industry specific social and environmental reporting: The Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum 2008, 32(1):1-15.
37. Guthrie J., Mathews M.R. Corporate social accounting in Australasia. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 1985, 7:251-277.
38. Hackston D., Milne M.J. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1996, 9(1):77-108.
39. Holder-Webb L., Cohen J.R., Nath L., Wood D. The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 84(4):497-527.
40. Hopwood A.G. Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34(3-4):433-439.
41. Ijiri Y. On the accountability-based conceptual framework of accounting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1983, 2(2):75-81.
42. Jose A., Lee S.M. Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 2007, 72(4):307-321.
43. KPMG KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005 2005, KPMG International, Amsterdam.
44. KPMG KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008 2008, KPMG International, Amsterdam.
45. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology 2004, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
46. Kuk G., Fokeer S., Hung W.T. Strategic formulation and communication of corporate environmental policy statements: UK firms' perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 2005, 58(4):375-385.
47. Lamberton G. Sustainability accounting-A brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum 2005, 29(1):7-26.
48. Lindblom C.K. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference 1993.
49. Mathews M.R. Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1997, 10(4):481-531.
50. Milne M., Gray R. Future prospects for corporate sustainability reporting. Sustainability accounting and accountability 2007, 184-207. Routledge, London. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, B. O'Dwyer (Eds.).
51. Milne M.J., Adler R.W. Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1999, 12(2):237-256.
52. MIRA-T Milieurapport Vlaanderen indicatorrapport 2008, MIRA-T-Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij (VMM), Brussel.
53. Moniteur Belge of 20 January 2006, Law regarding the company code (Wetboek van Vennootschappen), Issued on 13 January 2006 and activated on 30 January 2006.
54. Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1998, 23(3):265-282.
55. Neuendorf K.A. The content analysis guidebook 2002, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
56. O'Dwyer B., Owen D.L. Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. British Accounting Review 2005, 37(2):205-229.
57. O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., Bradley J. Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland. Engaging the voices of non-governmental organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2005, 18(1):14-43.
58. O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., Hession E. User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review 2005, 14(4):759-787.
59. OECD OECD environmental performance reviews 2007, OECD Publishing, Belgium. 10.1787/9789264031128-en.
60. Patten D. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2002, 27(8):763-773.
61. Reynolds M.A., Yuthas K. Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 78(1-2):47-64.
62. Robertson D.C., Nicholson N. Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 1996, 15(10):1085-1106.
63. Scholtens B. Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 86(2):159-175.
64. Striukova L., Unerman J., Guthrie J. Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: Evidence from UK companies. British Accounting Review 2008, 40(4):297-313.
65. Thomson I. Mapping the terrain of sustainability accounting. Sustainability accounting and accountability 2007, 184-207. Routledge, London. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, B. O'Dwyer (Eds.).
66. Tilt C.A. The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure. Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1994, 7(4):47-72.
67. Tilt, C. A. (2004). Influences on corporate social disclosure: A look at lobby groups ten years on. School of Commerce Research Paper Series, Flinders University, No. 01-01. Available from: Accessed 26 November 2010. http://www.flinders.edu.au/sabs/business/research/papers/papers_home.cfm.
68. Toms J.S. Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. British Accounting Review 2002, 34(3):257-282.
69. Unerman J. Methodological issues: Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2000, 13(5):667-680.
70. van Staden C.J., Hooks J. A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. British Accounting Review 2007, 39(3):197-210.
71. Vuontisjärvi T. Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosures: An analysis of Finnish companies. Journal of Business Ethics 2006, 69(4):331-354.
72. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 49, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Wetboek van Vennootschappen (Belgian Company Code), art. 96 and 119 regarding the annual report, installed by the Law of 13 January 2006.
74. Willis A. The role of the Global Reporting Initiative's sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 43(3):233-237.
75. Wiseman J. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1982, 7(1):53-63.
76. Zéghal D., Ahmed S.A. Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1990, 3(1):38-53.