Does peripheral retinal input explain the promising myopia control effects of corneal reshaping therapy (CRT or ortho-K) & multifocal soft contact lenses?

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 379-384

  Smith, Earl L ^a   Campbell, Melanie C W ^b   Irving, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORNEA; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; HYPERMETROPIA; METHODOLOGY; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGY LENS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; VISUAL FIELD;

CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGIC PROCEDURES; RETINA; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84877833133     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12060     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wallman J & Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron 2004; 43: 447-468.
2. Smith EL III & Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 2010: a case for peripheral optical treatment strategies for myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 1029-1044.
3. Liu Y & Wildsoet CF. The effect of 2-zone concentric bifocal spectacle lenses on refractive error development and eye growth in young chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1078-1086.
4. Berntsen DA, Barr C, Mutti DO & Zadnik K. Peripheral defocus and myopia progression in children wearing single vision and progressive addition spectacle lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: E-Abstract 120220.
5. Cheng D, Schmid KL, Woo GC & Drobe B. Randomized trial of effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal spectacles on myopic progression. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128: 12-19.
6. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1492-1500.
7. Cho P & Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 7077-7085.
8. Walline JJ, Jones-Jordan LA, Greiner K & McVey M. The effects of soft bifocal contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: E- Abstract 110642.
9. Sankaridurg P, Donovan L, Varnas S et al. Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 631-641.
10. Sankaridurg P, Holden BA, Smith EL III, Naduvilath T, Chen X & Lazon De La Jara P et al.. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 9362-9367.
11. Anstice NS & Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 1152-1161.
12. Charman WN & Radhakrishnan H. Peripheral refraction and the development of refractive error: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 321-338.
13. Backhouse S, Fox S, Ibrahim B & Phillips JR. Peripheral refraction in myopia corrected with spectacles versus contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 294-303.
14. Rosen R, Lundstrom L & Unsbo P. Sign-dependent sensitivity to peripheral defocus for myopes due to aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 7176-7182.
15. Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology. Prog Retin Eye Res 2012; 31: 622-660.
16. Berntsen DA, Mutti DO & Zadnik K. Study of Theories about Myopia Progression (STAMP) design and baseline data. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 823-832.
17. Mutti DO, Sinnott LT, Mitchell GL et al. Relative peripheral refractive error and the risk of onset and progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 199-205.
18. Sng CC, Lin XY, Gazzard G et al. Peripheral refraction and refractive error in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1181-1190.
19. Kisilak ML, Campbell MC, Hunter JJ, Irving EL & Huang L. Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2006; 192: 845-855.
20. Kisilak ML, Hunter JJ, Huang L, Campbell MCW & Irving EL. In chicks wearing high powered negative lenses, spherical refraction is compensated and oblique astigmatism is induced. J Mod Opt 2008; 55: 611-623.
21. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L et al. A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 4702-4706.
22. Liu Y & Wildsoet C. The effective add inherent in 2-zone negative lenses inhibits eye growth in myopic young chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 5085-5093.
23. Tse DY & To CH. Graded competing regional myopic and hyperopic defocus produce summated emmetropization set points in chick. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 8056-8062.
24. Tse DY, Lam CS, Guggenheim JA et al. Simultaneous defocus integration during refractive development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 5352-5359.
25. Irving EL, Callender MG & Sivak JG. Inducing ametropias in hatchling chicks by defocus-aperture effects and cylindrical lenses. Vision Res 1995; 35: 1165-1174.
26. Tepelus TC, Vazquez D, Seidemann A, Uttenweiler D & Schaeffel F. Effects of lenses with different power profiles on eye shape in chickens. Vision Res 2012; 54: 12-19.
27. Woods J, Guthrie SE, Keir N et al. Inhibition of defocus-induced myopia in chickens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10742.