A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 4702-4706

  Walline, Jeffrey J ^a   Jones, Lisa A ^a   Sinnott, Loraine ^a   Manny, Ruth E ^b   Gaume, Amber ^b   Rah, Marjorie J ^c   Chitkara, Monica ^a   Lyons, Stacy ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ACCOMMODATION PARALYSIS; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; BLEPHARITIS; CELLULITIS; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA DYSTROPHY; DISEASE COURSE; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE CARE; EYE INJURY; FEMALE; HERPES SIMPLEX; HORDEOLUM; HUMAN; IRIDOCYCLITIS; KERATITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SCHOOL CHILD; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SPECTACLES; VIRAL CONJUNCTIVITIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; ECHOGRAPHY; EYE REFRACTION; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 56149090884     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2067     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pärssinen O, Lyyra AL. Myopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: a three-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(9):2794-2802. (Pubitemid 23232491)
2. Goss DA, Cox VD. Trends in the change of clinical refractive error in myopes. J Am Optom Assoc. 1985;56(8):608-613.
3. Braun CI, Freidlin V, Sperduto RD, Milton RC, Strahlman ER. The progression of myopia in school age children: data from the Columbia Medical Plan. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. Mar 1996;3(1):13-21. (Pubitemid 26098607)
4. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Friedman NE, et al. Ocular predictors of the onset of juvenile myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(9):1936-1943. (Pubitemid 29365155)
5. Goss DA. Cessation age of childhood myopia progression. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7(2):195-197.
6. Walline J, Jones LA, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. A randomized trial of the effects of rigid contact lenses on myopia progression. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(12):1760-1766. (Pubitemid 39602135)
7. Katz J, Schein OD, Levy B, et al. A randomized trial of rigid gas permeable contact lenses to reduce progression of children's myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(1):82-90. (Pubitemid 36794499)
8. Walline JJ, Rah MJ, Jones LA. The Children's Overnight Orthokeratology Investigation (COOKI) pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(6):407-413.
9. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res. 2005;30(1):71-80. (Pubitemid 40327693)
10. Soni PS, Horner DG, Jimenez L, Ross J, Rounds J. Will young children comply and follow instructions to successfully wear soft contact lenses? CLAO J. 1995;21(2):86-92.
11. Horner DG, Soni PS, Salmon TO, Swartz TS. Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(7):474-479. (Pubitemid 29367686)
12. Grosvenor T. Changes in corneal curvature and subjective refraction of soft contact lens wearers. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975;52(6):405-413.
13. Harris MG, Sarver MD, Polse KA. Corneal curvature and refractive error changes associated with wearing hydrogel contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975;52(5):313-319.
14. Barnett W, Rengstorff R. Adaptation to hydrogel contact lenses: variations in myopia and corneal curvature measurements. J Am Optom Assoc. 1977;48:363-366. (Pubitemid 8059929)
15. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, Pritchard N. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85(3):176-182.
16. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(12):845-849.
17. Andreo LK. Long-term effects of hydrophilic contact lenses on myopia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1990;22(6):224-229.
18. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Chitkara M, et al. The Adolescent and Child Health Initiative to Encourage Vision Empowerment (ACHIEVE) study design and baseline data. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(1):37-45. (Pubitemid 43361654)
19. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Friedman NE, Adams AJ. Initial cross-sectional results from the Orinda Longitudinal Study of Myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(9):750-758. (Pubitemid 23274123)
20. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(6):367-375. (Pubitemid 27310328)
21. Peduzzi P, Detre K, Wittes J, Holford T. Intent-to-treat analysis and the problem of crossovers: an example from the Veterans Administration coronary bypass surgery study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101(3):481-487.
22. Peduzzi P, Wittes J, Detre K, Holford T. Analysis as-randomized and the problem of non-adherence: an example from the Veterans Affairs Randomized Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Stat Med. 1993;12(13):1185-1195. (Pubitemid 23220539)
23. Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(4):320-324. (Pubitemid 36523534)