Identifying radiological needs of referring clinicians

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 393-401

  Zhang, Li ^a   Hefke, Antje ^a   Figiel, Jens ^a   Schwarz, Ulrike ^a   Rominger, Marga ^a   Klose, Klaus Jochen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consumer satisfaction; Kano model; Performance measurement; Quality; Radiology workflow

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSUMER SATISFACTIONS; KANO MODEL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI); OPERATION TIME; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS; PRODUCT FEATURE; RADIOLOGY WORKFLOW;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIATION; RADIOLOGY; TURNAROUND TIME;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT REFERRAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; STANDARDS;

HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84877755759     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9551-x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Institute of Medicine: The Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21th Century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001
2. Zhang L, Hefke A, Figiel J, Romminger M, Klose K: Enhancing same day access to magnetic resonance imaging. J of the American College of Radiology 8:649-656, 2011
3. Roth C, Boll D, Wall L, Merkle E: Evaluation of MRI acquisition workflow with Lean Six Sigma method: Case study of liver and knee examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:W150-W156, 2010
4. Swensen SJ, Meyer GS, Nelson EC, Hunt GC, Pryor DB, Weissberg JI, Kaplan GS, Daley J, Yates GR, Chassin MR, James BC, Berwick DM: Cottage industry to postindustrial care - the revolution in health care delivery. N Engl J Med 362:e12, 2010
5. Ondategui-Parra S, Erturk S, Ros P: Survey of the use of quality indicators in academic radiology departments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W451-W455, 2006
6. Cavagna E, Berletti R, Schiavon F, Scarsi B, Barbato G: Optimized delivery radiological reports: Applying six sigma methodology to a radiology department. Radiol Med 105:205-214, 2003
7. Klose K, Wecker C, Zhang L: Reducing report turnaround time using six sigma. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 4:162-163, 2009
8. Oehmen J, Rebentisch E: Waste in lean product development. In: Initiative LA Ed. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010
9. Berger C, Blauth R, Boger D, Bolster C, Burchill G, DuMouchel W, Pouliot F, Richter R, Rubinoff A, Shen D, Timko M, Walden D: Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management J 2:36, 1993
10. Cronin J, Taylor S: Servperf versus servqual - reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. J of Marketing 58:125-131, 1994
11. Chen S, Chang L, Huang T: Applying six-sigma methodology in the kano quality model: An example of the stationery industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 20:153-170, 2009
12. Shahin A, Zairi M: Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 20:1003-1028, 2009
13. Matzler K, Hinterhuber HH: How to make product develoment projects more sucessful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 25-38, 1998
14. Boland G, Houghton M, Marchione D, McCormick W: Maximizing outpatient computed tomography productivity using multiple technologists. J Am Coll Radiol 5:119-125, 2008
15. Krishnaraj A, Lee JK, Laws SA, Crawford TJ: Voice recognition software: Effect on radiology report turnaround time at an academic medical center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:194-197, 2010
16. Pande P, Neuman R, Cavanagh R: The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies Are Honing Their Performance. McGraw-Hill Professional, Columbus, 2001
17. Seltzer SE, Kelly P, Adams DF, Chiango BF, Viera MA, Fener E, Rondeau R, Kazanjian N, Laffel G, Shaffer K: Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:775-781, 1994
18. Boland GW, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS: Radiologist report turnaround time: Impact of pay-for-performance measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:707-711, 2010
19. Deetman J: Reducing throughput time of the radiodiagnostic track, University of Twente. Master 106, 2008
20. Kauppinen T, Koivikko MP, Ahovuo J: Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition - a follow-up study. J Digit Imaging 21:378-382, 2008