Service users as collaborators in mental health research: Less stick, more carrot

Psychological Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1121-1125

  Staley, K ^a   Kabir, T ^b   Szmukler, G ^b  

^a TwoCan Associates   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

collaborators; Patients; research; service users

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MOTIVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84877749576     PISSN: 00332917     EISSN: 14698978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291712001663     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Boote J, Baird W, Beecraft C (2009). Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research : A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 95, 10-23.
2. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C (2010). The PIRICOM Study. A systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patient and public involvement in health and social care research. United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration : London.
3. Crawford MJ, Robotham D, Thana L, Patterson S, Weaver T, Barber R, Wykes T, Rose D (2011). Selecting outcome measures in mental health : The views of service users. Journal of Mental Health 20, 336-346.
4. Department of Health (Research and Development Directorate) (2006). Best research for best health. A new national health research strategy. Department of Health : London.
5. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, Frankel S, Neal D, Hamdy F, for the Protect Study Group (2002). Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research : ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. British Medical Journal 325, 766-769.
6. Gillard S, Borschmann R, Turner K, Goodrich-Purnell, Lovell K, Chambers M (2010). What difference does it make Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients. Health Expectations 13, 185-194.
7. Kitcher P (2001). Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford University Press : Oxford.
8. Rose D, Leese M, Oliver D, Sidhu R, Bennewith O, Priebe S, Wykes T (2011). A comparison of participant information elicited by service user and non-service user researchers. Psychiatric Services 62, 210-213.
9. Smith E, Ross F, Donovan S, Manthorpe J, Brearley S, Sitzia J, Beresford P (2008). Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research : A review of evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45, 298-315.
10. Staley K (2009). Exploring impact. Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research (www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ Involve-Exploring-Impactfinal28.10.09.pdf). INVOLVE: Eastleigh. Accessed 10 May 2012.
11. Staley K (2011). Collaborate and succeed : An evaluation of the COMPASS masterclass in consumer involvement in research (www.ncri.org.uk/includes/news/ docs/ compassreportfinal.pdf). National Cancer Research Institute : London. Accessed 10 May 2012.
12. Staley K (2012). An evaluation of service user involvement in studies adopted by the Mental Health Research Network (www.mhrn.info/data/files/MHRN- PUBLICATIONS/ REPORTS/Service-user-involvement-evaluation.pdf). The Mental Health Research Network: London. Accessed 10 May 2012.
13. Szmukler G (2009). Service users in research and a wellordered science . Journal of Mental Health 18, 87-90.
14. Vale CL, Thompson LC, Murphy C, Forcat S, Hanley B (2012). Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit : Results of a survey. Trials 13, 9 [open access (http://www.trialsjournal.com/ content/13/1/9)].