Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease

Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 341-352

  Al Dhuhli, Humoud ^a  

^a SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Oman)

Author keywords

Biliary ducts; Cholangiocarcinoma; Cholangiography; Gallstone; Magnetic resonace cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877732416     PISSN: 2075051X     EISSN: 20750528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10.
2. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with failed or inadequate ERCP. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:1527-33.
3. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. MR Cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 2000; 20:939-57.
4. Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Catalano C, Brillo R, Assael F, et al. Diagnosis of diseases of biliary and pancreatic ducts with magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography (MRCP). Saudi J Gastroenterol 1998; 4:67-75.
5. O’Regan DP, Fitzgerald J, Allsop J, Gibson D, Larkman DJ, Cokkinos D, et al. A comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. Br J Radiol 2005; 78:894-8.
6. Merkle EM, Haugan PA, Thomas J, Jaffe TA, Gullotto C. 3.0- versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186:516-21.
7. Schindera ST, Miller CM, Ho LM, DeLong DM, Merkle EM. Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison 3 Tesla with1.5 tesla. Invest Radiol 2007; 42:399-405
8. Lee NJ, Kim KW, Kim TK, Kim MH, Kim SY, Park MS, et al. Secretin-stimulated MRCP. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31:575-81.
9. Akisik MF, Sandrasegaran K, Aisen AA, Maglinte DDT, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Dynamic secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiographics 2006; 26:665-77.
10. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977; 134:263-9.
11. Matos C, Nicaise N, Deviere J, Cassart M, Metens T, Struyven J, et al. Choledochal cysts: comparison of findings at MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in eight patients. Radiology 1998; 209:443-8.
12. Sugiyama M, Baba M, Atomi Y, Hanaoka H, Mizutani Y, Hachiya J. Diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction: Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surgery 1998; 123:391-7.
13. Northover JMA, Terblanche J. Applied surgical anatomy of the biliary tree. Clin Surg Int 1982; 5:1-16.
14. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1996; 199:521-7.
15. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165:9-14.
16. Hall-Craggs M, Allen C, Owens C, Theis BA, Donald JJ, Paley M, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993; 189:423-7.
17. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:589-97.
18. Soto JA, Alvarez O, Lopera JR, Múnera F, Restrepo JC, Correa G. Biliary Obstruction: Findings at MR cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging. Radiographics 2000; 20:353-66.
19. Brink JA, Borrello JA. MR imaging of the biliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995; 3:143-60.
20. Parikh AA, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN. Operative considerations in resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2005; 7:254-8.
21. Lee WJ, Lim HK, Jang KM, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Lim JH et al. Radiologic spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma: Emphasis on unusual manifestations and differential diagnoses. Radiographics 2001; 21:S97-S116.
22. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1501-05.
23. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R, PS Calhoun, DF Bliss, A Scherrer, et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1427-31.
24. Soyer P, Gouhiri MH, Boudiaf M, Brocheriou-Spelle I, Kardache M, Fishman EK, et al. Carcinoma of the gall bladder: imaging features with surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:781-5.
25. Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, Ernst RD, Black CT, Greger PH, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999; 178:480-4.
26. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1364-6.
27. Aubé C, Delorme B, Yzet T, Burtin P, Lebigot J, Pessaux P, Gondry-Jouet C, Boyer J. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:55-62.
28. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran A, et al. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:241-50.
29. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Barkun AN, et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 209:435-42.
30. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim YH, Kim MJ, Kim JH, Lee S, et al. Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology 1998; 209:781-5.
31. Hakansson K, Leander P, Ekberg O, Hakansson HO. MR imaging in clinically suspected acute cholecystitis: a comparison with ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 2000; 41:322-8.
32. Khalid TR, Casillas VJ, Montalvo BM, Centeno R, Levi JU. Using MR Cholangiopancreatography to Evaluate Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1347-52.
33. Linhares MM, Gonzalez AM, Goldman SM, Coelho RD, Sato NY, Moura RM, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:947-8.
34. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Orthotopic liver transplantation: Evaluation with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1999; 211:715-22.
35. Kitazono MT, Qayyum A, Yeh BM, Chard PS, Ostroff JW, Coakley FV. Magnetic resonance cholangiography of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: a prospective double-blind study. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25:1168-73.
36. Ward J, Sheridan MB, Guthrie JA, Davies MH, Millson CE, Lodge J PA, et al. Bile duct strictures after hepatobiliary surgery: Assessment with MR cholangiography. Radiology 2004; 231:101-8.
37. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Freed KS, Enns RA, Spritzer CE, Baillie JM, et al. Radiologic manifestations of sclerosing cholangitis with emphasis on MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiographics 2000; 20:959-75.
38. Schuster DM, Pedrosa MC, Robbins AH. Magnetic resonance cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 1995; 20:353-6.
39. Ernst O, Asselah T, Sergent G, Calvo M, Talbodec N, Paris JC, et al. MR cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:1027-30.
40. Vitellas KM, Enns RA, Keogan MT, Freed KS, Spritzer CE, Baillie J. Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatographic techniques with contrast-enhanced cholangiography in the evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:327-34.