Bile Duct Structures after Hepatobilitary Surgery: Assessment with MR Cholangiography

Radiology

Volumn 231, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 101-108

  Ward, Janice ^a   Sheridan, Maria B ^a   Guthrie, J Ashley ^a   Davies, Mervyn H ^a   Millson, Charles E ^a   Lodge, J Peter A ^a   Pollard, Stephen G ^a   Prasad, Kondragunta R ^a   Toogood, Giles J ^a   Robinson, Philip J ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bile ducts, MR; Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Magnetic resonance (MR), cholangiopancreatography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DILATATION; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER FUNCTION TEST; LIVER RESECTION; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ANASTOMOSIS; BILE DUCT DISEASE; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GALLBLADDER; HEPATIC DUCT; HOSPITALIZATION; INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; BILE DUCT DISEASES; BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; COMMON BILE DUCT; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER; HEPATIC DUCT, COMMON; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1642412037     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2311030017     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA. Open cholecystectomy: a contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 1993; 218:129-137.
2. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165:9-14.
3. Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G. Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era: a standard for comparison. Arch Surg 1992; 127:400-403.
4. Slanetz PJ, Boland GW, Mueller PR. Imaging and interventional radiology in laparoscopic injuries to the gallbladder and biliary system. Radiology 1996; 201:595-603.
5. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1356-1360.
6. Andren-Sandberg A, Johansson S, Bengmark S. Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. II. Results of treatment. Ann Surg 1985; 201: 452-455.
7. Hintze RE, Alder A, Veltzke W, Abou-Redyeh H, Felix R, Neuhaus P. Endoscopic management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 1997; 44:258-262.
8. Colonna JO 2nd, Shaked A, Gomes AS, et al. Biliary strictures complicating liver transplantation: incidence, pathogenesis, management and outcome. Ann Surg 1992; 216:344-352.
9. Theilmann L, Küppers B, Kadmon M, et al. Biliary tract strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation: diagnosis and management. Endoscopy 1994; 26:517-522.
10. Neuhaus P, Blumhardt G, Bechstein WO, Steffen R, Platz KP, Keck H. Technique and results of biliary reconstruction using side-to-side choledochocholedochostomy in 300 orthotopic liver transplants. Ann Surg 1994; 219:426-434.
11. Greif F, Bronsther OL, Van Thiel DH, et al. The incidence, timing and management of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1994; 219:40-45.
12. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10.
13. Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:17-22.
14. Adamek HE, Albert J, Weitz M, Breer H, Schilling D, Riemann JF. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 1998; 43:680-683.
15. Laghi A, Pavone P, Catalano C, et al. MR cholangiography of late biliary complications after liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:1541-1546.
16. Chaudhary A, Negi SS, Puri SK, Narang P. Comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in the evaluation of bile duct strictures after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89:433-436.
17. Boraschi P, Braccini G, Gigoni R, et al. Detection of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with MR cholangiography. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19:1097-1105.
18. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:807-811.
19. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1999; 211: 715-722.
20. Khalid TR, Casillas VJ, Montalvo BM, Centeno R, Levi JU. Using MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate iatrogenic bile duct injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1347-1352.
21. Meersschaut V, Mortelé KJ, Troisi R, et al. Value of MR cholangiography in the evaluation of postoperative biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1576-1581.
22. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A, et al. Pancreaticobiliary ductal system: value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiopancreatography for postoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000; 215:81-88.
23. Hussein FM, Alsumait B, Aman S, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis by magnetic resonance cholangiogram. Australas Radiol 2002; 46:41-46.
24. Coakley FV, Schwartz LH, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Panicek DM. Complex postcholecystectomy biliary disorders: preliminary experience with evaluation by means of breath-hold MR cholangiography. Radiology 1998; 209: 141-146.
25. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making 1984; 4:137-150.
26. Newcombe RG. Two sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17:857-872.
27. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207:21-32.
28. Oliver JH 3rd, Federle MP, Campbell WL, Zajko A. Imaging the hepatic transplant. Radiol Clin North Am 1991; 29:1285-1298.
29. Nghiem HV, Tran K, Winter TC 3rd, et al. Imaging of complications in liver transplantation. RadioGraphics 1996; 16:825-840.
30. Northover JM, Terblanche J. A new look at the arterial supply of the bile duct in man and its surgical implications. Br J Surg 1979; 66:379-384.
31. Sanchez-Urdazpal L, Gores GJ, Ward EM, et al. Ischemic-type biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 1992; 16:49-53.
32. Terblanche J, Allison HF, Northover JM. An ischemic basis for biliary strictures. Surgery 1983; 94:52-57.
33. Robinson PJ. Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. Br J Radiol 1997; 70:1085-1098.
34. Aideyan UO, Berbaum K, Smith WL. Influence of prior radiologic information on the interpretation of radiographic examinations. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:205-208.
35. Doubilet P, Herman PG. Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137:1055-1058.
36. Sheng R, Ramirez CB, Zajko AB, Campbell WL. Biliary stones and sludge in liver transplant patients: a 13-year experience. Radiology 1996; 198:243-247.
37. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, et al. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with failed or inadequate ERCP. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 1527-1533.