Biliary obstruction: Findings at MR cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging

Radiographics

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 353-366

  Soto, Jorge A ^a   Alvarez, Oscar ^a   Lopera, Jorge E ^a   Múnera, Felipe ^a   Restrepo, Juan C ^a   Correa, Gonzalo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Bile duct radiography, 76.122; Bile ducts, calculi, 76.28; Bile ducts, mr, 76.121411, 121412, 121415; Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction, 76.28; Bile ducts, surgery, 76.453

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; BILE DUCT BYPASS; BILE DUCT TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CHOLESTASIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PATHOLOGY; STENT; WOUND DRAINAGE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; BALLOON DILATATION; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLEDOCHOSTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CHOLESTASIS; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PALLIATIVE CARE; STENTS;

EID: 0034145493     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc06353     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a heavily T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181:805-808.
2. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992; 183:578-580.
3. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, Kobayashi T. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 12:2072-2077.
4. Hall-Craggs M, Allen C, Owens C, et al. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 1993; 189:423-427.
5. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, et al. Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995; 196:227-232.
6. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:589-597.
7. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997; 205:523-530.
8. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998; 209:435-442.
9. Chan Y, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 200:85-89.
10. Laubenberger J, Buchen M, Schneider B, Blum U, Hennig J, Langer M. Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance-cholangio-pancreaticography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:18-23.
11. Schwartz LH, Coakley FV, Sun Y, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Panicek DM. Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1491-1495.
12. Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Magnuson T. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:1441-1445.
13. Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sackmann M, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1998; 206:657-664.
14. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T, et al. Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 1998; 206:379-387.
15. Brink JA, Borrello JA. MR imaging of the biliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995; 3:143-160.
16. Low RN, Sigeti JS, Francis IR, et al. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:315-323.
17. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1501-1505.
18. Dooms GC, Kerlan RK, Hricak H, Wall SD, Margulis AR. Cholangiocarcinoma: imaging by MR. Radiology 1986; 159:89-94.
19. Guthrie JA, Ward J, Robinson PJ. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 201:347-351.
20. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R, et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: I. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1427-1431.
21. Fan ZM, Yamashita Y, Harada M, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:313-317.
22. Choi BI, Kim TK, Han JK. MRI of clonorchiasis and cholangiocarcinoma: J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:359-366.
23. Schwartz LH, Coakley FV, Sun Y, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Panicek DM. Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1491-1495.
24. Semelka RC, Ascher SM. MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 1993; 188:593-602.
25. Mitchell DG. MR imaging of the pancreas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995; 3:51-71.
26. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP, et al. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1991; 181:785-791.
27. Low RN, Francis IR, Sigeti JS, et al. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging. Radiology 1993; 186:803-811.
28. Vellet AD, Romano W, Bach DB, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparative evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1992; 183:87-95.
29. Darweesh RMA, Thorsen MK, Dodds WJ, et al. Computed tomography examination of periampullary neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12:36-41.
30. Soyer P, Gouhiri MH, Boudiaf M, et al. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: imaging features with surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:781-785.
31. Sons HU, Borchard F, Joel BS. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: autopsy findings in 287 cases and review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 1985; 28:199-206.
32. Ohtani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, Muto T, Hatakeyama K. Spread of gallbladder carcinoma: CT evaluation with pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21:195-201.
33. Sagoh T, Itoh K, Togashi K, et al. Gallbladder carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174:131-136.
34. Forbes A, Cotton PB. ERCP and sphincterotomy after Billroth II gastrectomy. Gut 1984; 25:971-974.
35. Osnes M, Rosseland AR, Aabakken L. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic papillotomy in patients with a previous Billroth-II resection. Gut 1986; 27:1193-1198.
36. Cunningham JT. Endoscopic papillotomy and stent insertion: B-II technique and limitations. In: Barkin JS, O'Phelan CA, eds. Advanced therapeutic endoscopy. New York, NY: Raven, 1990; 193-200.
37. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70:314-320.
38. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996; 199:91-98.
39. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:807-811.