Genetic variability among Pinus pinea L. provenances for survival and growth traits in Portugal

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 855-866

  Carrasquinho, Isabel ^a   Gonçalves, Elsa ^b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGAÇÃO AGRÁRIA E VETERINÁRIA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Genetic variability; Mixed models; Pinus pinea L; Provenances

Indexed keywords

PINUS CEMBROIDES; PINUS PINEA;

EID: 84877722078     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-013-0603-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anekonda TS, Libby WJ (1996) Effectiveness of nearest-neighbor data adjustment in a clonal test of redwood. Silvae Genet 45(1): 46-51.
2. Barbéro M, Loisel R, Quézel P, Richardson DM, Romane F (1998) Pines of Mediterranean basin. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 153-170.
3. Carneiro MM, Alpuim M, Baeta J, Rocha ME, Carvalho MAV (2000) Ensaios de Proveniência de Pinheiro Manso (Pinus pinea L.) resultados dos cinco primeiros anos. I Acréscimos em Altura. In: Actas 1er Simposio del Pino Piñonero, Tomo II, Valladolid, 22-24 February 2000: 129-137.
4. Carneiro A, Navalho E, Fernandes L, Carrasquinho I (2006) Provenance variation for growth traits of Pinus pinea L. in Portugal. Proceedings of the IUFRO division 2 joint conference on low input breeding and genetic conservation of forest tree species, Antalya, Turkey, 9-13 October, 2006. http://www4. ncsu. edu/~fisik/IUFRO%20Antalya%20Conference-Proceedings. pdf. Accessed 13 March 2012.
5. Carrasquinho I, Freire J, Rodrigues A, Tomé M (2010) Selection of Pinus pinea L. plus trees candidates for cone production. Ann. For. Sci 67(8): 814-820.
6. Costa e Silva J, Dutkowski GW, Gilmour AR (2001) Analysis of early tree in forest genetic trials is enhanced by including a spatially correlated residual. Can J For Res 31: 1887-1893.
7. Court-Picon M, Gadbin-Henry C, Guibal F, Roux M (2004) Dendrometry and morphometry of Pinus pinea L. in lower Provence (France): adaptability and variability of provenances. For Ecol Manag 194: 319-333.
8. Dutkowski GW, Costa-Silva J, Gilmour AR, Lopez GA (2002) Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials. Can J For Res 32: 2201-2214.
9. Dutkowski GW, Costa-Silva J, Gilmour AR, Wellendorf H, Aguiar A (2006) Spatial analysis enhances modelling of a wide variety of traits in forest genetic trials. Can J For Res 36: 1851-1870.
10. Evaristo I, Seabra R, Baeta J, Pais MS (2002) Caracterização molecular de proveniências de Pinus pinea L. por RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA). Silva Lusitana 10(1): 53-61.
11. Fallour D, Fady B, Lefevre F (1997) Study on isozyme variation in Pinus pinea L.: evidence for low polymorphism. Silvae Genet 46(4): 201-207.
12. Fox JC, Ades PK, Bi H (2001) Stochastic structure and individual-tree growth models. For Ecol Manag 154: 261-276.
13. Fu YB, Yanchuk AD, Namkoong G (1999) Incomplete block designs for genetic testing: some practical considerations. Can J For Res 29: 1871-1878.
14. Gapare WJ, Ivkovic M, Dutkowski GW, Spencer DJ, Buxton P, Wu HX (2011) Genetic parameters and provenance variation of Pinus radiata D. Don. 'Eldridge collection' in Australia 1: growth and form traits. Tree Genet Genomes. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-011-0449-4.
15. Gezan SA, White TL, Huber DA (2006) Comparison of experimental designs for clonal forestry using simulated data. For Sci 52: 108-116.
16. Gonçalves E, St Aubyn A, Martins A (2010) Experimental designs for evaluation of genetic variability and selection of ancient grapevine varieties: a simulation study. Heredity 104: 552-562.
17. Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2: 269-293.
18. Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
19. Holderegger R, Kamm U, Gugerli F (2006) Adaptive vs. neutral diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landsc Ecol 21: 797-807.
20. Jennrich RI, Sampson PF (1976) Newton-Raphson and related algorithms for maximum likelihood variance component estimation. Technometrics 18(1): 11-17.
21. Kusnandar D, Galwey N (2000) A proposed method for estimation of genetic parameters on forest trees without raising progeny: critical evaluation and refinement. Silvae Genet 49: 15-21.
22. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS system for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
23. Magnussen S (1990) Application and comparison of spatial models in analyzing tree-genetics field trials. Can J For Res 20: 536-546.
24. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM (2008) Generalized linear and mixed models, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
25. Miguez-Soto B, Fernández-López J (2011) Genetic parameters and predicted selection responses for timber production traits in a Castanea sativa progeny trial: developing a breeding program. Tree Genet Genomes 8(2): 409-423. doi: 10. 1007/s11295-011-0451-x.
26. Mutke S, Gordo J, Gil L (2005) Cone yield characterization of a stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) clone bank. Silvae Genet 54(4-5): 189-197.
27. Mutke S, Gordo J, Chambel MR, Prada MA, Álvarez D, Iglesias S, Gil L (2010) Phenotypic plasticity is stronger than adaptative differentiation among Mediterranean stone pine provenances. For Syst 19(3): 354-366.
28. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.
29. Ræbild A, Graudal L (2004) Evaluation of a provenance trial of Acacia tortilis at Khor Donia, Sudan. Trial no. 26 in the arid zones series. Results and documentation no. 30. Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek, Demark.
30. Sánchez-Gómez D, Velasco-Conde T, Cano-Martín FJ, Guevara MA, Cervera MT, Aranda I (2011) Inter-clonal variation in functional traits in response to drought for a genetically homogeneous Mediterranean conifer. Environ Exp Bot 70: 104-109.
31. SAS Institute Inc. (2008) SAS/STAT® 9. 2 User's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
32. Self SG, Liang KY (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 82: 605-610.
33. Sgrò C, Lowe A, Hoffmann A (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4: 326-337.
34. Stram DO, Lee JW (1994) Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
35. Vendramin GG, Fady B, González-Martínez SC, Hu FS, Scott I, Sebastiani F, Soto A, Petit R (2008) Genetically depauperate but widespread: the case of an emblematic Mediterranean pine. Evolution 62(3): 680-688.
36. Ye TZ, Jayawickrama JS (2008) Efficiency of using spatial analysis in first-generation coastal Douglas-fir progeny tests in the US Pacific Northwest. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 677-692.