Experimental designs for evaluation of genetic variability and selection of ancient grapevine varieties: A simulation study

Heredity

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 552-562

  Goncalves E ^a   St aubyn, A ^b,c   Martins, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^c Universidade Lusada de Lisboa   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Genetic selection; Genetic variability; Grapevine; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CLONAL ORGANISM; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; NATURAL SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; VINE;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GRAPE; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION, GENETIC; VITIS;

VITIS;

EID: 77952669113     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.153     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cullis BR, Gleeson AC (1991). Spatial analysis of field experiments-an extension to two dimensions. Biometrics 47: 1449-1460.
2. Dutkowski GW, Costa e Silva J, Gilmour AR, Wellendorf H, Aguiar A (2006). Spatial analysis enhances modelling of a wide variety of traits in forest genetic trials. Can J For Res 36: 1851-1870.
3. Federer WT (1998). Recovery of interblock, intergradient, and intervariety information in incomplete block and lattice rectangle designed experiments. Biometrics 54: 471-481.
4. Fisher RA (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh.
5. Fu YB, Clarke PY, Yanchuk AD (1998). Incomplete block designs for genetic testing: statistical efficiencies of estimating family means. Can J For Res 28: 977-986.
6. Fu YB, Yanchuk AD, Namkoong G (1999). Incomplete block designs for genetic testing: some practical considerations. Can J For Res 29: 1871-1878.
7. Gezan SA, White TL, Huber DA (2006). Comparison of experimental designs for clonal forestry using simulated data. For Sci 52: 108-116.
8. Gonçalves E, St.Aubyn A, Martins A (2007). Mixed spatial models for data analysis of yield on large grapevine selection field trials. Theor Appl Genet 115: 653-663.
9. Henderson CR (1975). Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
10. Jennrich RI, Sampson PF (1976). Newton-Raphson and related algorithms for maximum likelihood variance component estimation. Technometrics 18: 11-17.
11. John JA, Whitaker D (2000). Recursive formulae for the average efficiency factor in block and row-column designs. J R Stat Soc B 62: 575-583.
12. John JA,Williams ER (1998). t-Latinized designs. Aust N Z J Stat 40: 111-118.
13. Kempton R, Seraphin J, Sword A (1994). Statistical analysis of two-dimensional variation in variety yield trials. J Agric Sci 122: 335-342.
14. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006). SAS System for Mixed Models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute: Cary, NC.
15. Martins A (2007). Variabilidade genética intravarietal das castas. In: Böhm J (ed). Portugal vit?́cola, o grande livro das castas. Chaves Ferreira Publicações: Lisboa. pp 53-56.
16. Matheron G (1963). Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58: 1246-1266.
17. Nguyen NK (1994). Construction of optimal block designs by computer. Technometrics 36: 300-307.
18. Nguyen NK (1997). Construction of optimal row-column designs by computer. Comput Sci Stat 28: 471-475.
19. OIV (1991). Résolution VITI 1/91, programme type pour la réalisation de la sélection clonale de la vigne. Bulletin de l'OIV 1991: 752-763.
20. Patterson HD, Hunter EA (1983). The efficiency of incomplete block designs in national list and recommended list cereal variety trials. J Agric Sci 101: 427-433.
21. Patterson HD, Silvey V (1980). Statutory and recommended list trials of crop varieties in the United Kingdom. J R Stat Soc A 143: 219-252.
22. Patterson HD, Williams ER (1976). A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63: 83-92.
23. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971). Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.
24. Patterson HD,Williams ER, Hunter EA (1978). Block designs for variety trials. J Agric Sci 90: 395-400.
25. Piepho HP, Richter C, Williams E (2008). Nearest neighbour adjustment and linear variance models in plant breeding trials. Biom J 50: 164-189.
26. Qiao CG, Basford KE, DeLacy IH, Cooper M (2000). Evaluation of experimental designs and spatial analyses in wheat breeding trials. Theor Appl Genet 100: 9-16.
27. SAS Institute (2003). SAS Proprietary Software. Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC.
28. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992). Variance Components. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
29. Whitaker D, Williams ER, John JA (2007). CycDesigN: a package for computer generation of experimental designs. http:// www.cycdesign.co.nz.
30. Williams ER, John JA (1989). Construction of row and column designs with contiguous replicates. Appl Stat 38: 149-154.
31. Williams ER, John JA, Whitaker D (2006). Construction of resolvable spatial row-column designs. Biometrics 62: 103-108.
32. Williams ER (1985). A criterion for the construction of optimal neighbour designs. J R Stat Soc B 47: 489-497.
33. Yates F (1936). A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. J Agric Sci 26: 424-455.
34. Yates F (1940). Lattice squares. J Agric Sci 30: 672-687.
35. Yau S (1997). Efficiency of alpha-lattice designs in international variety yield trials of barley and wheat. J Agric Sci 128: 5-9.