Patient preferences for outcomes of depression treatment in Germany: A choice-based conjoint analysis study

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volumn 148, Issue 2-3, 2013, Pages 210-219

  Zimmermann, Thomas M ^a   Clouth, Johannes ^a   Elosge, Michael ^a   Heurich, Matthias ^b   Schneider, Edith ^a   Wilhelm, Stefan ^a   Wolfrath, Anette ^b  

^a LILLY DEUTSCHLAND GMBH   (Germany)

^b HealthCare ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Antidepressants; Choice based conjoint analysis; Depression; Discrete choice analysis; Patient preferences

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DIZZINESS; DSM-IV; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GERMANY; GUILT; HEADACHE; HUMAN; ICD-10; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOOD DISORDER; NAUSEA; PAIN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLEEP DISORDER; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; XEROSTOMIA;

ADULT; ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS; BAYES THEOREM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877699014     PISSN: 01650327     EISSN: 15732517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.062     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arbeitskreis Deutscher Markt- und Sozialforschungsinstitute e.V. (ADM). Standards for Quality Assurance for Online Surveys. Edition 2001. Available at: 〈http://www.adm-ev.de/index.php?id=2&L=1〉. Accessed at: 08 December 2011.
2. K. Auspurg, T. Hinz, and S. Liebig Complexity, learning effects, and plausibility of vignettes in factorial surveys. [Komplexität von Vignetten, Lerneffekte und Plausibilität im Faktoriellen Survey] Methoden, Daten und Analysen 3 2009 59 96
3. O. Benkert, and H. Hippius Kompendium der Psychiatrischen Pharmakotherapie seventh ed. 2011 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg, Germany p. 17
4. C. Bieber, K.N. Müller, K. Blumenstiel, A. Richter, A. Hochlehnert, S. Wilke, and W. Eich In 'Gemeinsam entscheiden - erfolgreich behandeln' 2005 M. Härter/A. Loh/C. Spies (Hrsg.), Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag Cologne, Germany
5. Bridges, F.P,; Hauber, A.B,; Marshall, D,; Lloyd, A,; Prosser, L.A,; Regier, D.A. Johnson, F.P,; Mauskopf, J,; 2011. Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - A Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force, Available at: 〈http://www.ispor.org/ TaskForces/documents/ISPOR-CA-in-Health-TF-Report-Checklist.pdf〉. Accessed on 09 November 2012
6. B. Carlsen, and A. Aakvik Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction Health Expectations 9 2006 148 157
7. M. Danner, J.M. Hummel, F. Volz, J.G. van Manen, B. Wiegard, C.M. Dintsios, H. Bastian, A. Gerber, and M.J. Ijzerman Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences International Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Health Care, Oct 27 4 2011 369 375
8. E.W. de Bekker-Grob, M.L. Essink-Bot, W.J. Meerding, H.A. Pols, B.W. Koes, and E.W. Steyerberg Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment Osteoporosis International 19 2008 1029 1037
9. German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy [Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde, DGPPN]. S3-Guideline "Unipolar Depression [Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie "Unipolare Depression], August 2011. Version 1.2. Available at: 〈http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/depression/pdf/ s3-nvl-depression-lang.pdf〉. Accessed on: 09 November, 2011.
10. M. Dwight-Johnson, I.T. Lagomasino, J. Hay, L. Zhang, L. Tang, J.M. Green, and N. Duan Effectiveness of collaborative care in addressing depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos Psychiatric Services 61 2010 1112 1118
11. European Pharmaceutical Market Research Association (EphMRA). Code of Conduct 2011. Available at: 〈http://www.ephmra.org/pdf/ EphMRA%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20May%202011.pdf〉. Accessed on: 08 December, 2011.
12. Federal Joint Committee [Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA], 2011a. Modellprojekt. Verfahren zur verbesserten Versorgungsorientierung am Beispielthema Depression. Abschlussbericht AG Versorgungsorientierung/ Priorisierung, Stand: 3. Februar 2011. Available at: 〈http://www.g-ba.de/ downloads/17-98-3016/2011-02-17-Versorgungsorientierung-Bericht.pdf〉. Accessed on: 09 November, 2011.
13. Federal Joint Committee [Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA], 2011b. 5. Kapitel der Verfahrensordnung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses, 20 January 2011. Anlage II, Kapitel 5, Modul 3, p.102. Available at: 〈http://www.g-ba. de/downloads/17-98-3025/2011-Kapitel%205%20VerfO-zweiseitig.pdf〉. Accessed on: 14 September, 2011.
14. Glaeske, G,; Schicktanz, C,; Jahnsen, K,; 2009. GEK-Arzneimittelreport 2009. Schriftenreihe zur Gesundheitsanalyse, Volume 68, Bremen, Schwäbisch Gmünd, July 2009, p. 137.
15. P.E. Green, and V.R. Rao Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data Journal of Marketing Research 8 1971 355 363
16. A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann, and F. Huber Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications fourth ed. 2007 Springer New York
17. M.J. Hummel, F. Volz, J.G. van Manen, M. Danner, C.M. Dintsios, M.J. Ijzerman, and A. Gerber Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment The Patient. Oct. 2012 25 (ahead of print)
18. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG), 2009. Allgemeine Meth-oden zur Bewertung von Verhältnissen zwischen Nutzen und Kosten. Available at: 〈https://www.iqwig.de/download/Methodik-fuer-die- Bewertung-von-Verhaeltnissen-zwischen-Kosten-und-Nutzen.pdf〉. Accessed on: 14 September, 2011.
19. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR). International Code on Market and Social Research, 2008. Available at: 〈http://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/knowledge-and- standards/codes-and-guidelines/ESOMAR-ICC-ESOMAR-Code-English.pdf〉. Accessed on: 08 December, 2011.
20. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2010. Available at: 〈 http://www.who.int/ classifications/icd/en/ 〉. Accessed on: 26 December, 2012.
21. G. Jasso Factorial survey methods for studying beliefs and judgments Sociological Methods & Research 34 2006 334 423
22. M.B. Keller, R.M. Hirschfeld, K. Demyttenaere, and D.S. Baldwin Optimizing outcomes in depression: focus on antidepressant compliance International Clinical Psychopharmacology 17 2002 265 271
23. E.T. Kinter Identifying treatment Preferences of Patients with Schizophrenia in Germany. An Application of Patient-centered Care. Dissertation 2009 Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland
24. B.M. Kwan, S. Dimidjian, and S.L. Rizvi Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression Behaviour Research and Therapy 48 2010 799 804
25. P.J. Lenk, W.S. De Sarbo, P.E. Green, and M.R. Young Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs Marketing Science 15 1996 173 191
26. J.J. Louviere, and W. Damowicz Stated choice Methods: Analysis and Application 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
27. R. Luce, and J. Tukey Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 1964 1 27
28. P.S. Masand Tolerability and adherence issues in antidepressant therapy Clinical Therapeutics 25 8 2003 2289 2304
29. C.A. Melfi, A.J. Chawla, T.W. Croghan, M.P. Hanna, S. Kennedy, and K. Sredl The effects of adherence to antidepressant treatment guidelines on relapse and recurrence of depression Archives of General Psychiatry 55 1998 1128 1132
30. H.J. Möller, W.E. Müller, and M. Schmauß Vorwort - antidepressiva: state of the art H.J. Möller, W.E. Müller, M. Schmauß, Innovation und Wandel der antidepressiven Therapie in Deutschland 2006 Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart Germany pp. XI-XVI
31. A.C. Mühlbacher, and M. Nübling Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma European Journal of Health Economics 12 2011 193 203
32. F. Porzsolt, J. Clouth, M. Deutschmann, and H.J. Hippler Preferences of diabetes patients and physicians: a feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 4 2010 125
33. J. Ratcliffe, R. Van Haselen, M. Buxton, K. Hardy, J. Colehan, and M. Partridge Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study Thorax 57 2002 503 508
34. P.J. Raue, H.C. Schulberg, M. Heo, S. Klimstra, and M.L. Bruce Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: a randomized primary care study Psychiatric Services 60 2009 337 343
35. M. Ryan, and S. Farrar Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care British Medical Journal 320 2000 1530 1533
36. Sawtooth Software, Inc. 2008. The CBC System for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis. Technical Paper. 〈http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/ techpap/cbctech.pdf〉. Accessed on: 22 September, 2011.
37. E. Schneider, D. Ziegler, S. Wilhelm, A. Schacht, and F. Birklein Patient expectations and physicians' judgement in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain European Journal of Pain 5 Suppl 2011 T266, 55
38. G.E. Simon, M. VonKorff, M. Piccinelli, C. Fullerton, and J. Ormel An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression New England Journal of Medicine 341 1999 1329 1335
39. P. Sobocki, B. Jönsson, J. Angst, and C. Rehnberg Cost of depression in Europe Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 2006 June 9 (2), 87-98
40. J.K. Swift, and J.L. Callahan The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis Journal of Clinical Psychology 65 2009 368 381
41. A. Tylee Identifying and managing depression in primary care in the United Kingdom Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 67 Suppl. 6 2006 41 45
42. H.U. Wittchen, F. Jacobi, J. Rehm, A. Gustavsson, M. Svensson, B. Jönsson, J. Olesen, C. Allgulander, J. Alonso, C. Faravelli, L. Fratiglioni, P. Jennum, R. Lieb, A. Maercker, J. van Os, M. Preisig, L. Salvador-Carulla, R. Simon, and H.C. Steinhausen The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010 European Neuropsychopharmacology 21 2011 655 679
43. M.N. Wittink, M. Cary, T. Tenhave, J. Baron, and J.J. Gallo Towards patient-centered care for depression: conjoint methods to tailor treatment based on preferences Patient 3 2010 145 157
44. G. Zimbardo Psychologie sixth ed. 1988 Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg p275