Concise review: Carbon nanotechnology: Perspectives in stem cell research

Stem Cells Translational Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 376-383

  Pryzhkova, Marina V ^a  

^a Independent researcher   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Graphene; Nanotechnology; Pluripotent stem cells; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

CARBON NANOTUBE; DIAMOND; FULLERENE DERIVATIVE; GRAPHENE; GRAPHITE; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; BIOSENSOR; CANCER THERAPY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ENDOCYTOSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; REVIEW; STEM CELL RESEARCH; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84877639082     PISSN: 21576564     EISSN: 21576580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0151     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. Ferreira L, Karp JM, Nobre L et al. New opportunities: The use of nanotechnologies to manipulate and track stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008;3:136-146.
2. Zhang S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:1171-1178.
3. Cameron DJ, Shaver MP. Aliphatic polyester polymer stars: Synthesis, properties and applications in biomedicine and nano technology. Chem Soc Rev 2011;40:1761-1776.
4. Kamaly N, Xiao Z, Valencia PM et al. Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: Design, development and clinical translation. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:2971-3010.
5. Douglas SM, Bachelet I, Church GM. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 2012;335:831-834.
6. Mimeault M, Batra SK. Great promise of tissue-resident adult stem/progenitor cells in transplantation and cancer therapies Adv Exp Med Biol2012 741 171-186
7. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998;282:1145-1147.
8. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007;131:861-872.
9. Cherry ABC, Daley GQ. Reprogramming cellular identity for regenerative medicine. Cell 2012;148:1110-1122.
10. Schwartz SD, Hubschman JP, Heilwell G et al. Embryonic stem cell trials for macular degeneration: A preliminary report. Lancet 2012; 379:713-720.
11. Keung AJ, Kumar S, Schaffer DV. Presentation counts: Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells by biophysical and material cues. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010;26:533-556.
12. Janmey PA, Miller RT. Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease. J Cell Sci 2011;124:9-18.
13. Pierson HO. Handbook of Carbon, Graphite, Diamonds and Fullerenes: Properties, Processing and Applications. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1993.
14. Penev ES, Artyukhov VI, Ding F et al. Unfolding the fullerene: Nanotubes, graphene and poly-elemental varieties by simulations. Adv Mater 2012;24:4956-4976.
15. Buseck PR, Tsipursky SJ, Hettich R. Fullerenes from the geological environment. Science 1992;257:215-217.
16. Becker L, Poreda RJ, Bunch TE. Fullerenes: An extraterrestrial carbon carrier phase for noble gases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:2979-2983.
17. Mochalin VN, Shenderova O, Ho D et al. The properties and applications of nanodiamonds. Nat Nanotechnol 2011;7:11-23.
18. Trabska J, Wesełucha-Birczyńska A, Zieba-Palus J et al. Black painted pottery, Kildehuse II, Odense County, Denmark. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2011;79:824-830.
19. Khatayevich D, So CR, Hayamizu Y et al. Controlling the surface chemistry of graphite by engineered self-assembled peptides. Langmuir 2012;28:8589-8593.
20. 60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985;318:162-163.
21. Chen Z, Ma L, Liu Y et al. Applications of functionalized fullerenes in tumor theranostics. Theranostics 2012;2:238-250.
22. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004;306:666-669.
23. Geim AK. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 2009;324:1530-1534.
24. Ponomarenko LA, Schedin F, Katsnelson MI et al. Chaotic Dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science 2008;320:356-358.
25. Li X, Wang X, Zhang L et al. Chemically derived, ultrasmooth graphene nanoribbon semiconductors. Science 2008;319:1229-1232.
26. Torrisi F, Hasan T, Wu W et al. Inkjetprinted graphene electronics. ACS Nano 2012; 6:2992-3006.
27. Lee SK, Jang HY, Jang S et al. All graphene-based thin film transistors on flexible plastic substrates. Nano Lett 2012;12:3472-3476.
28. Blake P, Brimicombe PD, Nair RR et al. Graphene-based liquid crystal device. Nano Lett 2008;8:1704-1708.
29. Wang J, Liang M, Fang Y et al. Rod-coating: Towards large-area fabrication of uniform reduced graphene oxide films for flexible touch screens. Adv Mater 2012;24:2874-2878.
30. Lymberis A, Paradiso R. Smart fabrics and interactive textile enabling wearable personal applications: R&D state of the art and future challenges. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008;2008:5270-5273.
31. Li X, Sun P, Fan L et al. Multifunctional graphene woven fabrics. Sci Rep 2012;2:395.
32. Liu Y, Dong X, Chen P. Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:2283-2307.
33. Zhang Y, Nayak TR, Hong H et al. Graphene: A versatile nanoplatform for biomedical applications. Nanoscale 2012;4:3833-3842.
34. Xu M, Fujita D, Hanagata N. Perspectives and challenges of emerging single-molecule DNA sequencing technologies. Small 2009;5: 2638-2649.
35. Prasongkit J, Grigoriev A, Pathak B et al. Transverse conductance of DNA nucleotides in a graphene nanogap from first principles. Nano Lett 2011;11:1941-1945.
36. Merchant CA, Drndic M. Graphene nanopore devices for DNA sensing. Methods Mol Biol 2012;870:211-226.
37. Mohanty N, Berry V. Graphene-based single-bacterium resolution biodevice and DNA transistor: Interfacing graphene derivatives with nanoscale and microscale biocomponents. Nano Lett 2008;8:4469-4476.
38. Kim H, Namgung R, Singha K et al. Graphene oxide-polyethylenimine nanoconstruct as a gene delivery vector and bioimaging tool. Bioconjug Chem 2011;22:2558-2567.
39. Feng L, Zhang S, Liu Z. Graphene based gene transfection. Nanoscale 2011;3:1252-1257.
40. Hong J, Shah NJ, Drake AC et al. Graphene multilayers as gates for multi-week sequential release of proteins from surfaces. ACS Nano 2012;6:81-88.
41. Hu W, Peng C, Luo W et al. Graphenebased antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 2010;4: 4317-4323.
42. Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M et al. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 2011;5:6971-6980.
43. Some S, Ho SM, Dua P et al. Dual functions of highly potent graphene derivativepoly-L-lysine composites to inhibit bacteria and support human cells. ACS Nano 2012;6:7151- 7161.
44. Santos CM, Mangadlao J, Ahmed F et al. Graphene nanocomposite for biomedical applications: Fabrication, antimicrobial and cytotoxic investigations. Nanotechnology 2012;23: 395101.
45. Kim DH, Provenzano PP, Smith CL et al. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol 2012;197:351-360.
46. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-689.
47. Zoldan J, Karagiannis ED, Lee CY et al. The influence of scaffold elasticity on germ layer specification of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 2011;32:9612-9621.
48. Théry M. Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions. J Cell Sci 2010;123:4201-4213.
49. Agudelo-Garcia PA, De Jesus JK, Williams SP et al. Glioma cell migration on three-dimensional nanofiber scaffolds is regulated by substrate topography and abolished by inhibition of STAT3 signaling. Neoplasia 2011;13:831-840.
50. Nayak TR, Andersen H, Makam VS et al. Graphene for controlled and accelerated osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Nano 2011;5:4670-4678.
51. Lee WC, Lim CH, Shi H et al. Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2011;5:7334-7341.
52. Chen GY, Pang DW, Hwang SM et al. A graphene-based platform for induced pluripotent stem cells culture and differentiation. Biomaterials 2012;33:418-427.
53. van Kooten TG, Spijker HT, Busscher HJ. Plasma-treated polystyrene surfaces: Model surfaces for studying cell-biomaterial interactions. Biomaterials 2004;25:1735-1747.
54. Park SY, Park J, Sim SH et al. Enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells into neurons on graphene. Adv Mater 2011;23: H263-H267.
55. Fabbro A, Bosi S, Ballerini L et al. Carbon nanotubes: Artificial nanomaterials to engineer single neurons and neuronal networks. ACS Chem Neurosci 2012;3:611-618.
56. Chen MQ, Xie X, Wilson KD et al. Currentcontrolled electrical point-source stimulation of embryonic stem cells. Cell Mol Bioeng 2009; 2:625-635.
57. Mooney E, Mackle JN, Blond DJ et al. The electrical stimulation of carbon nanotubes to provide a cardiomimetic cue to MSCs. Biomaterials 2012;33:6132-6139.
58. Sucapane A, Cellot G, Prato M et al. Interactions between cultured neurons and carbon nanotubes: A nanoneuroscience vignette. J Nanoneurosci 2009;1:10-16.
59. Zhou K, Thouas GA, Bernard CC et al. Method to impart electro- and biofunctionality to neural scaffolds using graphene-polyelectrolyte multilayers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012;4:4524-4531.
60. Monthioux M, Kuznetsov VL. Who should be given the credit for the discovery of carbon nanotubes? Carbon 2006;44:1621-1623.
61. Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991;354:56-58.
62. Shen C, Brozena AH, Wang Y. Doublewalled carbon nanotubes: Challenges and opportunities. Nanoscale 2011;3:503-518.
63. Meyyappan M. Carbon Nanotubes: Science and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004.
64. Schnorr JM, Swager TM. Emerging applications of carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater 2011;23:646-657.
65. Yang W, Ratinac KR, Ringer SP et al. Carbon nanomaterials in biosensors: Should you use nanotubes or graphene? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2010;49:2114-2138.
66. Avila AG, Hinestroza JP. Smart textiles: Tough cotton. Nat Nanotechnol 2008;3:458-459.
67. Nanot S, Haroz EH, Kim JH et al. Optoelectronic properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater 2012;24:4977-4994.
68. Green AA, Hersam MC. Colored semitransparent conductive coatings consisting of monodisperse metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 2008;8:1417-1422.
69. Klingeler R, Sim RB, eds. Carbon Nanotubes for Biomedical Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2011.
70. Cui HF, Vashist SK, Al-Rubeaan K et al. Interfacing carbon nanotubes with living mammalian cells and cytotoxicity issues. Chem Res Toxicol 2010;23:1131-1147.
71. Villa CH, Dao T, Ahearn I et al. Singlewalled carbon nanotubes deliver peptide antigen into dendritic cells and enhance IgG responses to tumor-associated antigens. ACS Nano 2011;5:5300-5311.
72. Kraszewski S, Bianco A, Tarek M et al. Insertion of short amino-functionalized singlewalled carbon nanotubes into phospholipid bilayer occurs by passive diffusion. PLoS One 2012;7:e40703.
73. Fabbro C, Ali-Boucetta H, Da Ros T et al. Targeting carbon nanotubes against cancer. Chem Commun (Camb) 2012;48:3911-3926.
74. Kostarelos K, Lacerda L, Pastorin G et al. Cellular uptake of functionalized carbon nanotubes is independent of functional group and cell type. Nat Nanotechnol 2007;2:108-113.
75. Zhang M, Zhou X, Iijima S et al. Smallsized carbon nanohorns enabling cellular uptake control. Small 2012;8:2524-2531.
76. Marches R, Mikoryak C, Wang R. et al. The importance of cellular internalization of antibody-targeted carbon nanotubes in the photothermal ablation of breast cancer cells. Nanotechnology 2011;22.
77. Karousis N, Tagmatarchis N, Tasis D. Current progress on the chemical modification of carbon nanotubes. Chem Rev 2010;110:5366-5397.
78. Madani SY, Naderi N, Dissanayake O et al. A new era of cancer treatment: Carbon nanotubes as drug delivery tools. Int J Nanomedicine 2011;6:2963-2979.
79. Benincasa M, Pacor S, Wu W et al. Antifungal activity of amphotericin B conjugated to carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 2011;5:199-208.
80. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Saito R et al. Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Phys Rep 2005;409:47-99.
81. Liu Z, Davis C, Cai W et al. Circulation and long-term fate of functionalized, biocompatible single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice probed by Raman spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:1410-1415.
82. Iancu C, Mocan L. Advances in cancer therapy through the use of carbon nanotubemediated targeted hyperthermia. Int J Nanomedicine 2011;6:1675-1684.
83. Movia D, Prina-Mello A, Bazou D et al. Screening the cytotoxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes using novel 3D tissue-mimetic models. ACS Nano 2011;5:9278-9290.
84. Pietroiusti A, Massimiani M, Fenoglio I et al. Low doses of pristine and oxidized single-wall carbon nanotubes affect mammalian embryonic development. ACS Nano 2011;5:4624-4633.
85. Liu Z, Chen K, Davis C et al. Drug delivery with carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer treatment. Cancer Res 2008;68:6652-6660.
86. Ruggiero A, Villa CH, Bander E et al. Paradoxical glomerular filtration of carbon nanotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107: 12369-12374.
87. Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M. Making carbon nanotubes biocompatible and biodegradable. Chem Commun (Camb) 2011;47: 10182-10188.
88. Nunes A, Bussy C, Gherardini L et al. In vivo degradation of functionalized carbon nanotubes after stereotactic administration in the brain cortex. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2012;7: 1485-1494.
89. Kotchey GP, Hasan SA, Kapralov AA et al. A natural vanishing act: The enzyme-catalyzed degradation of carbon nanomaterials. Acc Chem Res 2012;45:1770-1781.
90. Lin C, Wang Y, Lai Y et al. Incorporation of carboxylation multiwalled carbon nanotubes into biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2011;83:367-375.
91. Baik KY, Park SY, Heo K et al. Carbon nanotube monolayer cues for osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Small 2011;7:741-745
92. Bhattacharya M, Wutticharoenmongkol- Thitiwongsawet P, Hamamoto DT et al. Bone formation on carbon nanotube composite.J Biomed Mater Res A 2011;96:75-82
93. Im O, Li J, Wang M et al. Biomimetic threedimensional nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and magnetically synthesized single-walled carbon nanotube chitosan nanocomposite for bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine 2012;7:2087-2099.
94. Shin SR, Bae H, Cha JM et al. Carbon nanotube reinforced hybrid microgels as scaffold materials for cell encapsulation. ACS Nano 2012;6:362-372.
95. Aslan S, Loebick CZ, Kang S et al. Antimicrobial biomaterials based on carbon nanotubes dispersed in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid). Nanoscale 2010;2:1789-1794.
96. Martinelli V, Cellot G, Toma FM et al. Carbon nanotubes promote growth and spontaneous electrical activity in cultured cardiac myocytes. Nano Lett 2012;12:1831-1838.
97. Park SY, Kang BS, Hong S. Improved neural differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells interfaced with carbon nanotube scaffolds. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
98. Cellot G, Toma FM, Varley ZK et al. Carbon nanotube scaffolds tune synaptic strength in cultured neural circuits: Novel frontiers in nanomaterial-tissue interactions. J Neurosci 2011;31:12945-12953.
99. Fabbro A, Villari A, Laishram J et al. Spinal cord explants use carbon nanotube interfaces to enhance neurite outgrowth and to fortify synaptic inputs. ACS Nano 2012;6:2041-2055.
100. Sridharan I, Kim T, Wang R. Adapting collagen/CNT matrix in directing hESC differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 381:508-512.
101. Chao TI, Xiang S, Lipstate JF et al. Poly-(methacrylic acid)-grafted carbon nanotube scaffolds enhance differentiation of hESCs into neuronal cells. Adv Mater 2010;22:3542-3547.
102. Chen CS, Soni S, Le C et al. Human stem cell neuronal differentiation on silk-carbon nanotube composite. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012;7:126.
103. Vierbuchen T, Wernig M. Molecular roadblocks for cellular reprogramming. Mol Cell 2012;47:827-838.
104. Lowry WE, Quan WL. Roadblocks en route to the clinical application of induced pluripotent stem cells. J Cell Sci 2010;123:643-651.
105. González F, Boue S, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: Reprogramming à la carte. Nat Rev Genet 2011;231-2242.
106. McDevitt MR, Chattopadhyay D, Kappel BJ et al. Tumor targeting with antibody-functionalized, radiolabeled carbon nanotubes. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1180-1189.
107. Cyranoski D, Baker M. Stem-cell claim gets cold reception. Nature 2008;452:132.
108. Kostarelos K, Bianco A, Prato M. Hype around nanotubes creates unrealistic hopes. Nature 2008;453:280.
109. Qian L, Huang Y, Spencer CI et al. In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature 2012; 485:593-598.
110. Banga A, Akinci E, Greder LV et al. In vivo reprogramming of Sox9+ cells in the liver to insulin-secreting ducts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:15336-15341.
111. Garriga-Canut M, Agustín-Pavón C, Herrmann F et al. Synthetic zinc finger repressors reduce mutant huntingtin expression in the brain of R6/2 mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:E3136-E3145.
112. McNeer NA, Schleifman EB, Cuthbert A et al. Systemic delivery of triplex-forming PNA and donor DNA by nanoparticles mediates sitespecific genome editing of human hematopoietic cells in vivo. Gene Ther 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
113. Gottlieb B, Beitel LK, Alvarado C et al. Selection and mutation in the "new" genetics: An emerging hypothesis. Hum Genet 2010; 127:491-501.
114. Abyzov A, Mariani J, Palejev D et al. Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2012;492:438-442.