Small-angle scattering study of structural changes in the microfibril network of nanocellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis

Cellulose

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1031-1040

  Penttilä, Paavo A ^a   Várnai, Anikó ^a   Fernández, Manuel ^b   Kontro, Inkeri ^a   Liljeström, Ville ^a   Lindner, Peter ^c   Siika aho, Matti ^d   Viikari, Liisa ^a   Serimaa, Ritva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

^c INSTITUT LAUE LANGEVIN   (France)

^d VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Cellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Hemicellulose; SANS; SAXS

Indexed keywords

HEMICELLULOSE; HETEROGENEOUS STRUCTURES; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (NFC); SANS; SAXS; SMALL ANGLE X-RAY SCATTERING; SMALL-ANGLE NEUTRON SCATTERING; SMALL-ANGLE SCATTERING;

BIOETHANOL; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; NEUTRON SCATTERING;

CELLULOSE;

EID: 84877624497     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-9899-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101: 4851-4861. doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2009. 11. 093.
2. Arantes V, Saddler JN (2010) Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 4. doi: 10. 1186/1754-6834-3-4.
3. Bubner P, Dohr J, Plank H, Mayrhofer C, Nidetzky BJ (2012) Cellulases dig deep: in situ observation of the mesoscopic structural dynamics of enzymatic cellulose degradation. J Biol Chem 287: 2759-2765. doi: 10. 1074/jbc. M111. 257717.
4. Chundawat SPS, Beckham GT, Himmel ME, Dale BE (2011) Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2: 121-145. doi: 10. 1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114205.
5. Hallac BB, Ragauskas AJ (2011) Analyzing cellulose degree of polymerization and its relevancy to cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5: 215-225. doi: 10. 1002/bbb. 269.
6. Horkay F, Hammouda B (2008) Small-angle neutron scattering from typical synthetic and biopolymer solutions. Colloid Polym Sci 286: 611-620. doi: 10. 1007/s00396-008-1849-3.
7. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttilä M, Ando T, Samejima M (2011) Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333: 1279-1282. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1208386.
8. Jalak J, Väljamäe P (2010) Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 106: 871-883. doi: 10. 1002/bit. 22779.
9. Kennedy CJ, Cameron GJ, Šturcová A, Apperley DC, Altaner C, Wess TJ, Jarvis MC (2007) Microfibril diameter in celery collenchyma cellulose: X-ray scattering and NMR evidence. Cellulose 14: 235-246. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-007-9116-1.
10. Kent MS, Cheng G, Murton JK, Carles EL, Dibble DC, Zendejas F, Rodriquez MA, Tran H, Holmes B, Simmons BA, Knierim B, Auer M, Banuelos JL, Urquidi J, Hjelm RP (2010) Study of enzymatic digestion of cellulose by small angle neutron scattering. Biomacromolecules 11: 357-368. doi: 10. 1021/bm9008952.
11. Leppänen K, Andersson S, Torkkeli M, Knaapila M, Kotelnikova N, Serimaa R (2009) Structure of cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from various wood species, cotton and flax studied by X-ray scattering. Cellulose 16: 999-1015. doi: 10. 1007/s10570-009-9298-9.
12. Lindner P (2002) Scattering experiments: experimental aspects, initial data reduction and absolute calibration. In: Lindner P, Zemb T (eds) Neutrons, x-rays and light: scattering methods applied to soft condensed matter. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 23-48.
13. Lopez-Rubio A, Gilbert EP (2009) Neutron scattering: a natural tool for food science and technology research. Trends Food Sci Technol 20: 576-586. doi: 10. 1016/j. tifs. 2009. 07. 008.
14. Murphy L, Cruys-Bagger N, Damgaard HD, Baumann MJ, Olsen SN, Borch K, Lassen SF, Sweeney M, Tatsumi H, Westh P (2012) Origin of initial burst in activity for Trichoderma reesei endo-glucanases hydrolyzing insoluble cellulose. J Biol Chem 287: 1252-1260. doi: 10. 1074/jbc. M111. 276485.
15. Penttilä PA, Várnai A, Leppänen K, Peura M, Kallonen A, Jääskeläinen P, Lucenius J, Ruokolainen J, Siika-aho M, Viikari L, Serimaa R (2010) Changes in submicrometer structure of enzymatically hydrolyzed microcrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 11: 1111-1117. doi: 10. 1021/bm1001119.
16. Penttilä PA, Várnai A, Pere J, Tammelin T, Salmén L, Siika-aho M, Viikari L, Serimaa R (2013) Xylan as limiting factor in enzymatic hydrolysis of nanocellulose. Bioresour Technol 129: 135-141. doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2012. 11. 017.
17. Santa-Maria M, Jeoh T (2010) Molecular-scale investigations of cellulose microstructure during enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 11: 2000-2007. doi: 10. 1021/bm100366h.
18. Shibayama M (2011) Small-angle neutron scattering on polymer gels: phase behavior, inhomogeneities and deformation mechanisms. Polym J 43: 18-34. doi: 10. 1038/pj. 2010. 110.
19. Wang L, Zhang Y, Gao P, Shi D, Liu H, Gao H (2006) Changes in the structural properties and rate of hydrolysis of cotton fibers during extended enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 93: 443-456. doi: 10. 1002/bit. 20730.
20. Waters DJ, Engberg K, Parke-Houben R, Ta CN, Jackson AJ, Toney MF, Frank CW (2011) Structure and mechanism of strength enhancement in interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Macromolecules 44: 5776-5787. doi: 10. 1021/ma200693e.
21. Zhou W, Schüttler H-B, Hao Z, Xu Y (2009) Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies I: a general modeling formalism. Biotechnol Bioeng 104: 261-274. doi: 10. 1002/bit. 22389.
22. Zhu L, O'Dwyer JP, Chang VS, Granda CB, Holtzapple MT (2008) Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour Technol 99: 3817-3828. doi: 10. 1016/j. biortech. 2007. 07. 033.