Patch isolation only matters for specialist butterflies but patch area affects both specialist and generalist species

Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 270-278

  Soga, Masashi ^a   Koike, Shinsuke ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Butterfly assemblages; Habitat fragmentation; Island biogeography theory; Landscape matrix; Species area relationship

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY ASSEMBLAGES; BUTTERFLY SPECIES; FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPES; GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY; ISOLATION EFFECTS; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP;

ECOLOGY;

FORESTRY;

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; GENERALIST; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY; ISOLATION EFFECT; PATCHINESS; SPECIALIST; SPECIES RICHNESS; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; VOLTINISM;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; JAPAN;

HONSHU; JAPAN; KANTO; TOKYO [KANTO];

PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 84877623580     PISSN: 13416979     EISSN: 16107403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-012-0349-y     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barton K (2009) MuMIn: multi-model inference (R package version 1. 0. 0). http://r-forge. r-project. org/projects/mumin/.
2. Bastin L, Thomas CD (1999) The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landsc Ecol 14: 493-507.
3. Bellamy PE, Hinsley SA, Newton I (1996) Factors influencing bird species numbers in small woods in south-east England. J Appl Ecol 33: 249-262.
4. Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2005) Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86: 1023-1033.
5. Brose U (2003) Island biogeography of temporary wetland carabid beetle communities. J Biogeogr 30: 879-888.
6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
7. Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113: 791-833.
8. Cook WM, Lane KT, Foster BL, Holt RD (2002) Island theory, matrix effects and species richness patterns in habitat fragments. Ecol Lett 5: 619-623.
9. Davies KF, Margules CR (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence. J Anim Ecol 67: 460-471.
10. Dormann CF, Schweiger O, Augenstein I, Bailey D, Billeter R, de Blust G, DeFilippi R, Frenzel M, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Liira J, Maelfait J, Schmidt T, Speelmans M, van Wingerden WKRE, Zobel M (2007) Effects of landscape structure and land-use intensity on similarity of plant and animal communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16: 774-787.
11. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 487-515.
12. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570-574.
13. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York.
14. Franklin JF (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol Appl 3: 202-205.
15. Fukuda H, Hama E, Kuzuya T, Takahashi A, Tahakashi M, Tanaka B, Tanaka H, Wakabayashi M, Watanabe Y (1982) The life histories of butterflies in Japan, vol I. Hoikusha, Osaka (in Japanese).
16. Fukuda H, Hama E, Kuzuya T, Takahashi A, Tahakashi M, Tanaka B, Tanaka H, Wakabayashi M, Watanabe Y (1983) The life histories of butterflies in Japan, vol II. Hoikusha, Osaka (in Japanese).
17. Fukuda H, Hama E, Kuzuya T, Takahashi A, Tahakashi M, Tanaka B, Tanaka H, Wakabayashi M, Watanabe Y (1984a) The life histories of butterflies in Japan, vol III. Hoikusha, Osaka (in Japanese).
18. Fukuda H, Hama E, Kuzuya T, Takahashi A, Tahakashi M, Tanaka B, Tanaka H, Wakabayashi M, Watanabe Y (1984b) The life histories of butterflies in Japan, vol IV. Hoikusha, Osaka (in Japanese).
19. Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO Jr, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91: 223-229.
20. Guldemond RAR, van Aarde RJ (2010) Forest patch size and isolation as drivers of bird species richness in Maputaland, Mozambique. J Biogeogr 37: 1884-1893.
21. Gustafson EJ, Gardner RH (1996) The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77: 94-107.
22. Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63: 151-162.
23. Hanski I, Gyllenberg M (1997) Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science 275: 397-400.
24. Jokimäki J, Huhta E (1996) Effects of landscape matrix and habitat structure on a bird community in northern Finland: a multi-scale approach. Ornis Fenn 73: 97-113.
25. Kataoka T, Tamura N (2005) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the presence of Japanese squirrels, Sciurus lis, in suburban forests. Mamm Stud 30: 131-137.
26. Kitahara M, Fujii K (1994) Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: an analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. specialist strategies. Popul Ecol 36: 187-199.
27. Koh LP, Sodhi NS, Brook BW (2004) Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 18: 1571-1578.
28. Kohn DD, Walsh DM (1994) Plant species richness-the effect of island size and habitat diversity. J Ecol 82: 367-377.
29. Kotze DJ, O'Hara RB (2003) Species decline-but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135: 138-148.
30. Kupfer JA, Malanson GP, Franklin SB (2006) Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on the forest fragmentation effects. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15: 8-20.
31. Kurosawa R, Askin RA (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds in deciduous forests in Japan. Conserv Biol 17: 695-707.
32. Laurance WF (1991) Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: application of a model for the design of nature reserves. Biol Conserv 57: 205-219.
33. Laurance WF, Yensen E (1991) Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biol Conserv 55: 77-92.
34. Lomolino MV, Brown JH, Davis R (1989) Island biogeography of montane forest mammals in the American southwest. Ecology 70: 180-194.
35. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
36. Magura T, Ködövöcz V, Tóthmérész B (2001) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabids in forest patches. J Biogeogr 28: 129-138.
37. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52: 883-890.
38. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2010) Homepage. http://www. maff. go. jp/j/tokei/index. html.
39. Nagase T (2004) Takao, Jinbasan no tyou. Keyaki, Tokyo (in Japanese).
40. Norton MR, Hannon SJ, Schmiegelow FKA (2000) Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. Ecography 23: 209-223.
41. Öckinger E, Smith HG (2006) Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 149: 526-534.
42. Pianka ER (1978) Evolutionary ecology. Harper and Row, New York.
43. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12: 116-134.
44. Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 20770-20775.
45. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
46. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158: 87-99.
47. Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70: 840-852.
48. Shapiro AM (1975) The temporal component of butterfly species diversity. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap, Harvard University, Cambridge, pp 181-195.
49. Sisk TD, Haddad NM, Ehrlich PR (1997) Bird assemblages in patchy woodlands: modeling the effects of edge and matrix habitats. Ecol Appl 7: 1170-1180.
50. Soga M, Koike S (2012) Life-history traits affect vulnerability of butterflies to habitat fragmentation in urban remnant forests. Ecoscience 19(1). doi: 10. 2980/19-1-3455.
51. Tischendorf L, Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2003) Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers. Landsc Ecol 18: 41-50.
52. Tokyo Metropolitan Government (2000) Tokyo road side tree map. Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Tokyo (in Japanese).
53. Umetsu F, Metzger JP, Pardini R (2008) Importance of estimating matrix quality for modeling species distribution in complex tropical landscapes: a test with Atlantic Forest small mammals. Ecography 31: 359-370.
54. Vos CC, Stumpel HP (1995) Comparison of habitat isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hylea arborea). Landsc Ecol 11: 203-214.
55. Watling JI, Nowakowski AJ, Donnelly MA, Orrock JL (2011) Meta-analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitat. Grob Ecol Biogeogr 20: 209-217.
56. Zimmerman K, Fric Z, Filipová L, Konvička M (2005) Adult demography, dispersal and behaviour of Brenthis ino (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): how to be a successful wetland butterfly. Eur J Entomol 102: 699-706.
57. Zschokke S, Dolt C, Rusterholz HP, Oggier P, Braschler B, Thommen GH, Ludin E, Erhardt A, Baur B (2000) Short-term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia 124: 559-572.