A relational database for bibliometric analysis

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 564-580

  Mallig, Nicolai ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Relational database; SQL

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956480676     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Butler L., Visser M.S. Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics 2006, 66(2):327-343.
2. Callon M., Courtial J.P., Turner W.A., Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information 1983, 22(2):191-235.
3. Chen P.P. The entity-relationship model-A basis for the enterprise view of data. AFIPS national computer conference 1977, 77-84.
4. Codd E.F. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM 1970, 13(6):377-387.
5. Davis P.M., Fromerth M.J. Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?. Scientometrics 2007, 71(2):203-215.
6. Fernández M.T., Cabrero A., Zulueta M.A., Gómez I. Constructing a relational database for bibliometric analysis. Research Evaluation 1993, 3(1):55-62.
7. Gauffriau M., Larsen P.O., Maye I., Roulin-Perriard A., von Ins M. Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics 2007, 73(2):175-214.
8. Glänzel W., Schubert A. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems 2004, 257-276. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
9. Glänzel W., Schubert A., Czerwon H.-J. A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the european union (1985-1995). Scientometrics 1999, 45(2):185-202.
10. Glänzel W., Schubert A., Czerwon H.-J. An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics 1999, 44(3):427-439.
11. Hood W.W., Wilson C.S. Informetric studies using databases: Opportunities and challenges. Scientometrics 2003, 58(3):587-608.
12. Larsen P.O. The state of the art in publication counting. Scientometrics 2008, 77(2):235-251.
13. Marx W., Schier H., Wanitschek M. Citation analysis using online databases: Feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics 2001, 52(1):59-82.
14. Moed H.F. The use of on-line databases for bibliometric analysis. Informetrics 1988, Vol. 87/88:133-146. Elsevier, Netherlands.
15. Moed H.F., De Bruin R.E., Van Leeuwen T.N. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 1995, 33(3):381-422.
16. Neuhaus C., Litscher A., Daniel H.-D. Using scripts to streamline citation analysis on STN international. Scientometrics 2007, 71(1):145-150.
17. Newman M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E-Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 2001, 64(1 II):016131/1-116131/8.
18. Otte E., Rousseau R. Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 2002, 28:441-453.
19. Rip A. Mapping of science: Possibilities and limitations. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology 1988, 253-273. North-Holland. A.F.J. van Raan (Ed.).
20. Shrum W., Mullins N. Network analysis in the study of science and technology. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology 1988, 107-133. North-Holland. A.F.J. van Raan (Ed.).
21. Simkin M., Roychowdhury V. Read before you cite!. Complex Systems 2003, 14:269-274.
22. Small H. Relational bibliometrics. Proceedings of the fifth biennial conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics 1995, 525-532. M.E. Koenig, A. Bookstein (Eds.).
23. Small H., Garfield E. The geography of science: Disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of Information Science 1985, 11:147-159.
24. van Leeuwen T. Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems 2004, 373-388. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.).
25. van Leeuwen T. Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment. Research Evaluation 2007, 16(2):93-105.
26. van Raan A.F.J. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 2005, 62(1):133-143.
27. Winterhager M. Towards bibliometric objects: A relational view to ISI's science citation index. Science and technology in a policy context 1992, 21-34. A.F.J. van Raan, R.E. de Bruin, H.F.J.N.A. Moed, R.W.J. Tijssen (Eds.).
28. Wolfram D. Applications of SQL for informetric frequency distribution processing. Scientometrics 2006, 67(2):301-313.
29. Yu H., Davis M., Wilson C.S., Cole F.T.H. Object-relational data modelling for informetric databases. Journal of Informetrics 2008, 2:240-251.
30. Zitt M., Teixeira N. Science macro-indicators: Some aspects of OST experience. Scientometrics 1996, 35(2):209-222.