Interpersonal Amplification of Risk? Citizen Discussions and Their Impact on Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of a Biological Research Facility

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 324-334

  Binder, Andrew R ^a   Scheufele, Dietram A ^b   Brossard, Dominique ^b   Gunther, Albert C ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Interpersonal discussion; Risk communication; Social amplification of risk

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFICATION STATIONS; BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; INTERPERSONAL DISCUSSION; MASS MEDIA; PERCEPTIONS OF RISKS; PUBLIC OPINIONS; RESIDENTS' PERCEPTIONS; RISK COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION OF RISK; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; TWO-DIMENSION;

AMPLIFICATION; COMMUNICATION; RESEARCH; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

CITIZENSHIP; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; MASS MEDIA; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIAL IMPACT;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951545062     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01516.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 1988; 8(2):177-187.
2. Renn O, Burns WJ, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 1992; 48(4):137-160.
3. Pidgeon NF, Kasperson RE, Kasperson JX. The Social Amplification of Risk. New York Cambridge University Press, 2003.
4. Greene JO, Burleson BR. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum, 2003.
5. Delli Carpini MX, Cook FL, Jacobs LR. Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 2004; 7:315-344.
6. Fishkin JS. Democracy and Deliberation. New Haven Yale University Press, 1991.
7. Schudson M. Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1997; 14(4):297-309.
8. Scheufele DA. Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 2000; 77(4):727-743.
9. Scheufele DA. Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 2002; 29(1):46-65.
10. Scheufele DA. Democracy for some? How political talk both informs and polarizes the electorate. Pp. 19-32 in Hart RP, Shaw D (eds). Communication and U.S. Elections: New Agendas. Lanham, MD Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2001.
11. Dunwoody S, Neuwirth K. Coming to terms with the impact of communication on scientific and technological risk judgments. Pp. 11-30 in Wilkins L, Patterson P (eds). Risky Business: Communicating Issues of Science, Risk, and Public Policy. Westport, CT Greenwood, 1991.
12. Gutmann JO, Thompson D. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 1996.
13. Binder AR. Routes to attention or shortcuts to apathy? Exploring domain-specific communication pathways and their implications for public perceptions of controversial science. Science Communication, in press. DOI: .
14. Tyler TR, Cook FL. The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal-level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984; 47(4):693-708.
15. Lehmkuhl MJ. Congruency within rural social networks as an indicator of interpersonal influence on risk judgments: The great stir caused by BSE in a village in northern Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 2008; 17(4):485-502.
16. Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF. Personal Influence. Glencoe, IL Free Press, 1955.
17. Klapper JT. The Effects of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL Free Press, 1960.
18. Coleman CL. The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Communication Research, 1993; 20(4):611-628.
19. Morton TA, Duck JM. Communication and health beliefs: Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 2001; 28(5):602-626.
20. Southwell BG, Torres A. Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs, 2006; 73(3):334-350.
21. Binder AR, Dalrymple KE, Brossard D, Scheufele DA. The soul of a polarized democracy: Testing theoretical linkages between talk and attitude extremity during the 2004 presidential election. Communication Research, 2009; 36(3):315-340.
22. Flynn J, Peters E, Mertz CK, Slovic P. Risk, media, and stigma at Rocky Flats. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(6):715-727.
23. Metz WC. Historical application of a social amplification of risk model: Economic impacts of risk events at nuclear weapons facilities. Risk Analysis, 1996; 16(2):185-193.
24. Huckfeldt R, Sprague JD. Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 1987; 81(4):1197-1216.
25. Noelle-Neumann E. The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 1974; 24(2):43-51.
26. Scheufele DA, Shanahan J, Lee E. Real talk: Manipulating the dependent variable in spiral of silence research. Communication Research, 2001; 28(3):304-324.
27. Renn O. Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. Pp. 287-324 in Kasperson RE, Stallen PJ (eds). Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer, 1991.
28. Moscovici S, Zavalloni M. The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969; 12:125-135.
29. Tesser A, Conlee MC. Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975; 31(2):262-270.
30. Brauer M, Gliner MD, Judd CM. The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995; 68(6):1014-1029.
31. Scheufele DA, Nisbet MC, Brossard D, Nisbet EC. Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 2004; 21(3):315-338.
32. Eveland WP. The effects of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 2004; 21(2):177-193.
33. Feldman L, Price V. Confusion or enlightenment? How exposure to disagreement moderates the effects of political discussion and media use on candidate knowledge. Communication Research, 2008; 35(1):61-87.
34. Huckfeldt R, Mendez JM, Osborn T. Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 2004; 25(1):65-95.
35. Mutz DC. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 2002;46(4):838-855.
36. Johnson JV. National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility: Final Environmental Impact Statement. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2008. Available at:, Accessed on August 3, 2009.
37. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 3rd ed. New York Wiley, 2008.
38. AAPOR. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 6th ed. Lenexa, KS AAPOR, 2009.
39. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum, 1983.
40. Eveland WP. Interactions and nonlinearity in mass communication: Connecting theory and methodology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1997; 74(2):400-416.
41. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage, 1991.
42. Huckfeldt R, Sprague JD. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York Cambridge University Press, 1995.
43. Eliasoph N. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York Cambridge University Press, 1998.
44. Babbie E. The Practice of Social Research, 11th ed. Belmont, CA Thomson Wadsworth, 2007.