Re-consider: The integration of online dispute resolution and decision support systems

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 430, Issue , 2008, Pages 62-72

  Muecke, Nial ^a   Stranieri, Andrew ^a   Miller, Charlynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Decision support; Deliberation; Family law; Knowledge modelling; Online dispute resolution

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORTS; DELIBERATION; FAMILY LAW; KNOWLEDGE MODELLING; ON-LINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84877350336     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Steve Abernethy. Building large-scale online dispute resolution & trustmark systems. In UNECE Forum on ODR, 2003.
2. R Alexander. Mediation, violence and the family. Alternative Law Journal, 17(6):276-99, 1992.
3. Emilia Bellucci and John Zeleznikow. Developing negotiation decision support systems that support mediators: A case study of the family winner system. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13:233 - 271, 2005.
4. Eugene Charniak. Bayesian networks without tears: making Bayesian networks more accessible to the probabilistically unsophisticated. AI Mag, 12(4):50-63, 1991.
5. Roger Fisher and William Ury. Getting to yes: Negotiating an agreement without giving in, Business Books Limited, 1991.
6. Ray Friedman, Cameron Anderson, Jeanne Brett, Mara Olekalns, Nathan Goates, and Cara Cherry Lisco. The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: Evidence from electronically mediated disputes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2):369-376, 2004.
7. Bernadine Van Gramberg. ADR and workplace justice: Just settlement? Working Paper, 2007.
8. Richard Ingleby. Court sponsored mediation: The case against mandatory participation. The Modern Law Review, 56(3):441-451, 1993.
9. Russell B Korobkin. Psychological impediments to mediation success: Theory and practice. Law-Econ Research Paper 05-9, UCLA School of Law, March 2005.
10. Kathy Mack. Court referral to ADR: Criteria and research. Technical report, Law School, Flinders University for the National ADR Advisory Council and Australian Institute of Judicial Administration2003. ISBN 1-875527-45-1
11. Marta Poblet and Pompeu Casanovas. Emotions in ODR. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 21(2):145-156, 2007.
12. Colin Rule and Larry Friedberg. The appropriate role of dispute resolution in building trust online, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(2):193-205, June 2005
13. A. Stranieri, J. Yearwood, and J. Zeleznikow. Argumentation structure that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 16(4):331-348, Aug 2002.
14. Andrew Stranieri and John Zeleznikow. Knowledge Discovery from Legal Databases. Law and Philosophy Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005.
15. Ernest Thiessen and John Zeleznikow. Technical aspects of online dispute resolution challenges and opportunities. In Melissa Conley Tyler, Ethan Katsh, and Daewon Choi, editors, Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution, 2004.
16. Melissa Conley Tyler. 115 and counting: The state of ODR 2004. In Melissa Conley Tyler, Ethan Katsh, and Daewon Choi, editors, Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution, 2004.
17. Douglase N. Walton and Eric C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, USA, 1995.
18. John Yearwood and Andrew Stranieri. The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning. Decision Support Systems, 41(2):358-379, Jan 2006.
19. John Zeleznikow, Emilia Bellucci, Uri J. Schild, and Geraldine Mackenzie. Bargaining in the shadow of the law - using utility functions to support legal negotiation. In ICAIL '07: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p237-246, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
20. Berry Zondag and Arno R. Lodder. Constructing computer assisted dispute resolution systems by developing a generic language to analyse information exchange in conflict discourse. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 21(2):191-205, July 2007.