The influence of the inactives subset generation on the performance of machine learning methods

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Smusz, Sabina ^a,b   Kurczab, Rafal ^a   Bojarski, Andrzej J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHARMACOLOGY   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877347625     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-17     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Geppert H, Vogt M, Bajorath J: Current trends in ligand-based virtual screening: molecular representations, data mining methods, new application areas, and performance evaluation. J Chem Inf Model 2010, 50:205-216.
2. Melville JL, Burke EK, Hirst JD: Machine learning in virtual screening. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2009, 12:332-343.
3. Schwaighofer A, Schroeter T, Mika S, Blanchard G: How wrong can we get? A review of machine learning approaches and error bars. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2009, 12:453-468.
4. Hert J, Willett P, Wilton DJ, Acklin P, Azzaoui K, Jacoby E, Schuffenhauer A: Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Org Biomol Chem 2004, 2:3256-3266.
5. Liu XH, Ma XH, Tan CY, Jiang YY, Go ML, Low BC, Chen YZ: Virtual screening of Abl inhibitors from large compound libraries by support vector machines. J Chem Inf Model 2009, 49:2101-2110.
6. Bruce CL, Melville JL, Pickett SD, Hirst JD: Contemporary QSAR classifiers compared. J Chem Inf Model 2007, 47:219-227. (Pubitemid 46225577)
7. Plewczynski D, Spieser SAH, Koch U: Assessing different classification methods for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:1098-1106. (Pubitemid 43999155)
8. Hammann F, Gutmann H, Baumann U, Helma C, Drewe J: Classification of Cytochrome P 450 Activities Using Machine Learning Methods. Mol Pharmaceutics 2009, 33:796-801.
9. Chen B, Harrison RF, Papadatos G, Willett P, Wood DJ, Lewell XQ, Greenidge P, Stiefl N: Evaluation of machine-learning methods for ligand-based virtual screening. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2007, 21:53-62. (Pubitemid 46416666)
10. Han LY, Ma XH, Lin HH, Jia J, Zhu F, Xue Y, Li ZR, Cao ZW, Ji ZL, Chen YZ: A support vector machines approach for virtual screening of active compounds of single and multiple mechanisms from large libraries at an improved hit-rate and enrichment factor. J Mol Graph Model 2008, 26:1276-1286.
11. Li H, Ung CY, Yap CW, Xue Y, Li ZR, Chen YZ: Prediction of estrogen receptor agonists and characterization of associated molecular descriptors by statistical learning methods. J Mol Graph Model 2006, 25:313-323. (Pubitemid 44740069)
12. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK ZINC: A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 2005, 45:177-182. (Pubitemid 40736970)
13. MDDR licensed by Accelrys, Inc. USA. www.accelrys.com.
14. Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ: Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem 2006, 49:6789-6801. (Pubitemid 44749746)
15. Nicholls A: What do we know and when do we know it? J Comput Aided Mol Des 2008, 22:239-255.
16. Ma XH, Jia J, Zhu F, Xue Y, Li ZR, Chen YZ: Comparative analysis of machine learning methods in ligand-based virtual screening of large compound libraries. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2009, 12:344-357.
17. Plewczynski D: Brainstorming: weighted voting prediction of inhibitors for protein targets. J Mol Model 2011, 17:2133-2141.
18. Plewczynski D, von Grotthuss M, Spieser SAH, Rychlewski L, Wyrwicz LS, Ginalski K, Koch U: Virtual high throughput screening using combined random forest and flexible docking. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2007, 10:189-196.
19. Gardiner EJ, Gillet VJ, Haranczyk M, Hert J, Holliday JD, Malim N, Patel Y, Willet P: Turbo Similarity Searching: Effect of Fingerprint and Dataset on Virtual-Screening Performance. Stat Anal Data Min 2009, 2:103-114.
20. InstantJChem: ChemAxon. 2011. www.chemaxon.com.
21. RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics. www.rdkit.org.
22. Discovery Studio, provided by Accelrys, Inc USA. www.accelrys.com.
23. Wang Y, Xiao J, Suzek TO, Zhang J, Wang J, Zhou Z, Han L, Karapetyan K, Dracheva S, Shoemaker BA, Bolton E, Gindulyte A, Bryant SH: PubChem's BioAssay Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D400-412.
24. Yap CWEI: PaDEL-Descriptor: An Open Source Software to Calculate Molecular Descriptors and Fingerprints. J Comput Chem 2010, 32:1466-1474.
25. Steinbeck C, Han Y, Kuhn S, Horlacher O, Luttmann E, Willighagen E: The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): an open-source Java library for Chemo- and Bioinformatics. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43:493-500.
26. Ewing T, Baber JC, Feher M: Novel 2D fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:2423-2431. (Pubitemid 46008115)
27. Klekota J, Roth FP: Chemical substructures that enrich for biological activity. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2518-2525.
28. Platt JC: Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. Edited by Scholkopf B, Burges C, Smola AJ. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1999:185-208.
29. Melville P: Mooney RJ Constructing Diverse Classifier Ensembles using Artificial Training Examples. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc; 2003:505-510.
30. Stefanowski J, Pachocki M: Comparing Performance of Committee Based Approaches to Active Learning. In Recent Advances in Intelligent Information Systems. Edited by Klopotek M, Przepiorkowski A, Wierzchon S, Trojanowski K. Warsaw: EXIT; 2009:457-470.
31. Deeb ZA, Devine T: Randomized Decimation HyperPipes. 2010. http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~timm/tmp/r7.pdf.
32. Breiman L: Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001, 45:5-32. (Pubitemid 32933532)
33. Svetnik V, Liaw A, Tong C, Culberson JC, Sheridan RP, Feuston BP: Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43:1947-1958.
34. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations 2009, 11:10-18.
35. Savojardo C, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Shukla P, Casadio R: Prediction of the Bonding State of Cysteine Residues in Proteins with Machine-Learning Methods. In Computational Intelligence Methods for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics 7th International Meeting. 6665th edition. Edited by Rizzo R, Lisboa PJG. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011:98-111.