Turbo similarity searching: Effect of fingerprint and dataset on virtual-screening performance

Statistical Analysis and Data Mining

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 103-114

  Gardiner, Eleanor J ^a   Gillet, Valerie J ^a   Haranczyk, Maciej ^a   Hert, Jérôme ^a   Holliday, John D ^a   Malim, Nurul ^a   Patel, Yogendra ^a   Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemical database; Chemoinformatics; Similar property principle; Similarity searching; Turbo similarity searching

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH; TOPOLOGY;

CHEMICAL DATABASE; CHEMOINFORMATICS; NEAREST-NEIGHBOUR; PROPERTY; SIMILAR PROPERTY PRINCIPLE; SIMILARITY SEARCH; SIMILARITY SEARCHING; TURBO SIMILARITY SEARCHING; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

DATA FUSION;

EID: 70349879097     PISSN: 19321872     EISSN: 19321864     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sam.10037     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. P. Willett, From chemical documentation to chemoinformatics: fifty years of chemical information science, J Inf Sci 34 (2008), 477-499.
2. J. Gasteiger and T. Engel (eds.), Chemoinformatics: A Textbook, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, 2000.
3. A. R. Leach and V. J. Gillet, An Introduction to Chemoinformatics (2nd ed.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2007.
4. H.-J. Böhm and G. Schneider (eds.), Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, 2000.
5. G. Klebe (ed.), Virtual Screening: an Alternative or Complement to High Throughput Screening. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2000.
6. F. L. Stahura and J. Bajorath, Virtual screening methods that complement high-throughput screening, Combin Chem High-Through Screen, 7 (2004), 259-269.
7. J. Alvarez and B. Shoichet (eds.), Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2005.
8. P. Willett, Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints, Drug Discov Today, 11 (2006), 1046-1053.
9. H. Eckert and J. Bajorath, Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitation and novel approaches, Drug Discov Today, 12 (2007), 225-233.
10. P. Willett, Similarity methods in chemoinformatics, Ann Rev Inf Sci Tech, 43 (2009), 3-71.
11. P. Willett, J. M. Barnard, and G. M. Downs, Chemical similarity searching, J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 38 (1998), 983-996.
12. R. P. Sheridan and S. K. Kearsley, Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?, Drug Discov Today, 7 (2002), 903-911.
13. N. Nikolova and J. Jaworska, Approaches to measure chemical similarity-a review, QSAR Combin Sci, 22 (2003), 1006-1026.
14. A. G. Maldonado, J. P. Doucet, M. Petitjean, and B.-T. Fan, Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: from theory to applications, Mol Diversity, 10 (2006), 39-79.
15. R. C. Glen and S. E. Adams, Similarity metrics and descriptor spaces-which combinations to choose?, QSAR Combin Sci, 25 (2006), 1133-1142.
16. R. P. Sheridan, Chemical similarity searches: when is complexity justified?, Expert Opin Drug Discov, 2 (2007), 423-430.
17. J. Hert, P. Willett, D. J. Wilton, P. Acklin, K. Azzaoui, E. Jacoby, and A. Schuffenhauer, Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbour information, J Med Chem, 48 (2005), 7049-7054.
18. M. A. Johnson and G. M. Maggiora (eds.), Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, New York, John Wiley, 1990.
19. Y. C. Martin, J. L. Kofron, and L. M. Traphagen, Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activities?, J Med Chem, 45 (2002), 4350-4358.
20. M. Whittle, V. J. Gillet, P. Willett, A. Alex, and J. Loesel, Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients, J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 44 (2004), 1840-1848.
21. J. Hert, P. Willett, D. J. Wilton, P. Acklin, K. Azzaoui, E. Jacoby, and A. Schuffenhauer, Comparison of fingerprintbased methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures, J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 44 (2004), 1177-1185.
22. C. Williams, Reverse fingerprinting, similarity searching by group fusion and fingerprint bit importance, Mol Diversity, 10 (2006), 311-332.
23. Q. Zhang and I. Muegge, Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring, J Med Chem, 49 (2006), 1536-1548.
24. A. E. Klon, M. Glick, M. Thoma, P. Acklin, and J. W. Davies, Finding more needles in the haystack: a simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results, J Med Chem, 47 (2004), 2743-2749.
25. H. Fukunishi, R. Teramoto, and J. Shimada, Hidden active information in a random compound library: extraction using a pseudo-structure-activity relationship model, J Chem Inf Model, 48 (2008), 575-582.
26. J. Hert, P. Willett, D. J. Wilton, P. Acklin, K. Azzaoui, E. Jacoby, and A. Schuffenhauer, New methods for ligandbased virtual screening: use of data-fusion and machinelearning techniques to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching, J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 46 (2006), 462-470.
27. B. B. Goldman and W. P. Walters, Machine learning in computational chemistry, Ann Reports Comput Chem, 2 (2006), 127-140.
28. A. Ormerod, P. Willett, and D. Bawden, Comparison of fragment weighting schemes for substructural analysis, Quant Struct-Activ Relat, 8 (1989), 115-129.
29. S. J. Edgar, J. D. Holliday, and P. Willett, Effectiveness of retrieval in similarity searches of chemical databases: a review of performance measures, J Mol Graph Mode, 18 (2000), 343-357.
30. J.-F. Truchon and C. I. Bayly, Evaluating virtual screening methods: good and bad metrics for the "early recognition" problem, J Chem Inf Model, 47 (2007), 488-508.
31. A. N. Jain and A. Nicholls, Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods, J Comput-Aided Mol Design, 22 (2008), 133-139.
32. T. Liu, Y. Lin, X. Wen, R. N. Jorrisen, and M. K. Gilson, BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand affinities, Nucleic Acids Res, 35 (2006), D198-D201.
33. M. Karthikeyan, R. C. Glen, and A. Bender, General melting point prediction based on a diverse compound data set and artificial neural networks, J Chem Inf Model, 45 (2005), 581-590.
34. J. Delaney, ESOL: estimating aqueous solubility directly from molecular structure, J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 44 (2004), 1000-1005.
35. J. Gasteiger (ed.), Handbook of Chemoinformatics. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, 2003.
36. J. Hert, P. Willett, D. J. Wilton, P. Acklin, K. Azzaoui, E. Jacoby, and A. Schuffenhauer, Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures, Org Biomol Chem, 2 (2004), 3256-3266.
37. E. J. Barker, D. Buttar, D. A. Cosgrove, E. J. Gardiner, V. J. Gillet, P. Kitts, and P. Willett, Scaffold-hopping using clique detection applied to reduced graphs, J Chem Inf Model, 46 (2006), 503-511.
38. A. M. Davis, D. J. Keeling, J. Steele, N. P. Tomkinson, and A. C. Tinker, Components of successful lead generation, Curr Topics Med Chem, 5 (2005), 421-439.
39. J.Hert,M.J.Kaiser,J.J.Irwin,T.I.Oprea,andB.K. Shoichet, Quantifying the relationships among drug classes, J Chem Inf Model, 48 (2008), 755-765.
40. P. Willett, Data fusion in ligand-based virtual screening, QSAR Combin Sci, 25 (2006), 1143-1152.
41. N. Wale, I. A. Watson, and G. Karypis, Indirect similarity methods for effective scaffold-hopping in chemical compounds, J Chem Inf Model, 48 (2008), 730-741.