Comparative Studies of Energy Sources in Gynecologic Laparoscopy

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 308-318

  Law, Kenneth S K ^a,b   Lyons, Stephen D ^a,b  

^a ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR WOMEN   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Comparative trials; Energy sources; Gynecologic laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST CONTROL; CYSTOVAGINAL FISTULA; ELECTROSURGERY; ENERGY RESOURCE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GENERAL SURGERY; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIGHT SCATTERING; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PLUME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SMOKE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TISSUE INJURY; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ANIMALS; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY;

EID: 84877314135     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Tou S., Malik A.I., Wexner S.D., Nelson R.L. Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, (5):CD007886.
2. Sasi W. Dissection by ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2010, 14:23-34.
3. Macario A., Dexter F., Sypal J., Cosgriff N., Heniford B.T. Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov 2008, 15:284-291.
4. Janssen P.F., Brolmann H.A.M., van Kesteren P.J.M., et al. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2011, 118:1568-1575.
5. Litta P., Fantinato S., Calonaci F., et al. A randomized controlled study comparing harmonic versus electrosurgery in laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2010, 94:1882-1886.
6. Demirturk F., Aytan H., Caliskan A.C. Comparison of the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer with harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007, 33:341-345.
7. Wang C.-J., Yuen L.-T., Yen C.-F., Lee C.-L., Soong Y.-K. Comparison of the efficacy of the pulsed bipolar system and conventional bipolar electrosurgery in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005, 15:361-364.
8. Ou C.-S., Joki J., Wells K., et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using multifunction grasping, coagulating, and cutting forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2004, 14:67-71.
9. Ou C.-S., Harper A., Liu Y.H., Rowbotham R. Laparoscopic myomectomy technique. Use of colpotomy and the harmonic scalpel. J Reprod Med 2002, 47:849-853.
10. Holub Z., Jabor A., Sprongl L., Kliment L., Fischlova D., Urbanek S. Inflammatory response and tissue trauma in laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of electrosurgery and harmonic scalpel. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2002, 29:105-109.
11. Lee C.-L., Huang K.-G., Wang C.-J., Lee P.-S., Hwang L.-L. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Gynecol Oncol 2007, 105:620-624.
12. Kyo S., Mizumoto Y., Takakura M., et al. Experience and efficacy of a bipolar vessel sealing system for radical abdominal hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009, 19:1658-1661.
13. Newcomb W.L., Hope W.W., Schmelzer T.M., et al. Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc 2009, 23:90-96.
14. Lamberton G.R., Hsi R.S., Jin D.H., Lindler T.U., Jellison F.C., Baldwin D.D. Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation devices. J Endourol 2008, 22:2307-2312.
15. Landman J., Kerbl K., Rehman J., et al. Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 2003, 169:697-700.
16. Harold K.L., Pollinger H., Matthews B.D., Kercher K.W., Sing R.F., Heniford B.T. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:1228-1230.
17. Milsom J., Trencheva K., Monette S., et al. Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and versatility of a new surgical energy device (THUNDERBEAT) in comparison with Harmonic ACE, LigaSure V, and EnSeal devices in a porcine model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012, 22:378-386.
18. Noble E.J., Smart N.J., Challand C., Sleigh K., Oriolowo A., Hosie K.B. Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices. Br J Surg 2011, 98:797-800.
19. Hruby G.W., Marruffo F.C., Durak E., et al. Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model. J Urol 2007, 178:2689-2693.
20. Person B., Vivas D.A., Ruiz D., Talcott M., Coad J.E., Wexner S.D. Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2008, 22:534-538.
21. Phillips C.K., Hruby G.W., Mirabile G., et al. The effect of intraluminal content on the bursting strength of vessels ligated with the harmonic ACE and LigaSure V. J Endourol 2008, 22:1383-1387.
22. Govekar H.R., Robinson T.N., Stiegmann G.V., McGreevy F.T. Residual heat of laparoscopic energy devices: how long must the surgeon wait to touch additional tissue?. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:3499-3502.
23. Sutton P.A., Awad S., Perkins A.C., Lobo D.N. Comparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, the Harmonic Scalpel and the Ligasure. Br J Surg 2010, 97:428-433.
24. Perko Z., Pogorelic Z., Bilan K., et al. Lateral thermal damage to rat abdominal wall after harmonic scalpel application. Surg Endosc 2006, 20:322-324.
25. Sinha U.K., Gallagher L.A. Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa. Laryngoscope 2003, 113:228-236.
26. Campbell P.A., Cresswell A.B., Frank T.G., Cuschieri A. Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:1640-1645.
27. Tulikangas P.K., Smith T., Falcone T., Boparai N., Walters M.D. Gross and histologic characteristics of laparoscopic injuries with four different energy sources. Fertil Steril 2001, 75:806-810.
28. Kwok A., Nevell D., Ferrier A., Graf N., Lam A., Ford R. Comparison of tissue injury between laparosonic coagulating shears and electrosurgical scissors in the sheep model. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001, 8:378-384.
29. Gruber D.D., Warner W.B., Lombardini E.D., Zahn C.M., Buller J.L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using various energy sources in swine: a histopathologic assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011, 205:494.e1-494.e6.
30. Zorn K.C., Bhojani N., Gautam G., et al. Application of ice cold irrigation during vascular pedicle control of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: EnSeal instrument cooling to reduce collateral thermal tissue damage. J Endourol 2010, 24:1991-1996.
31. EthiconEndo-Surgery. Available at: . Accessed February 22, 2013. http://www.ees.com/clinicians/products/energy-devices/harmonic-ace.
32. Campagnacci R., de Sanctis A., Baldarelli M., Rimini M., Lezoche G., Guerrieri M. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2007, 21:1526-1531.
33. Alp E., Bijl D., Bleichrodt R.P., Hansson B., Voss A. Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect 2006, 62:1-5.
34. Barrett W.L., Garber S.M. Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air?. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:979-987.
35. Weld K.J., Dryer S., Ames C.D., et al. Analysis of surgical smoke produced by various energy-based instruments and effect on laparoscopic visibility. J Endourol 2007, 21:347-351.
36. Kim F.J., Sehrt D., Pompeo A., Molina W.R. Comparison of surgical plume among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors using a real-time digital quantitative technology. Surg Endosc 2012, 26:3408-3412.
37. Lyons S.D., Law K.S. Laparoscopic Vessel Sealing Technologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013, 20:307-310.
38. Katsuno G., Nagakari K., Fukunaga M. Comparison of two different energy-based vascular sealing systems for the hemostasis of various types of arteries: a porcine model-evaluation of LigaSure ForceTriadTM. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010, 20:747-751.
39. Richter S., Kollmar O., Schilling M.K., et al. Efficacy and quality of vessel sealing: comparison of a reusable with a disposable device and effects of clamp surface geometry and structure. Surg Endosc 2006, 20:890-894.
40. Carbonell A.M., Joels C.S., Kercher K.W., et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003, 13:377-380.
41. Goldstein S.L., Harold K.L., Lentzner A., et al. Comparison of thermal spread after ureteral ligation with the Laparo-Sonic ultrasonic shears and the Ligasure system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002, 12:61-63.
42. Matthews B.D., Pratt B.L., Backus C.L., et al. Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis. Am Surg 2001, 67:901-906.