Comparison of two different energy-based vascular sealing systems for the hemostasis of various types of arteries: A porcine model-evaluation of ligasure forcetriad™

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 747-751

  Katsuno, Goutaro ^a   Nagakari, Kunihiko ^a   Fukunaga, Masaki ^a  

^a JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY MUSCLE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENATURATION; ELECTROSURGERY; HEMOSTASIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SWINE; THERMAL INJURY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ARTERIES; ELECTROSURGERY; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANIMAL; PRESSURE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWINE;

EID: 78149396119     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0438     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, et al. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1228-1230.
2. Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, et al. High-burststrength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 1988;12:876-878.
3. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Backus CL, et al. Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: A comparative analysis. Am Surg 2001;67:901-906.
4. Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Krecher KW, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and largesized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2003;13:377-380.
5. Richter S, Kollmar O, Schilling MK, et al. Efficacy and quality of vessel sealing: Comparison of a reusable with a disposable device and effects of clamp surface geometry and structure. Surg Endosc 2006;20:890-894.
6. Diamantis T, Knotos M, Arvelakis A, et al. Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure. Surg Today 2006;36:908-913.
7. Targarona EM, Balaque C, Marin J, et al. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: A prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computercontrolled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov 2005;12:339-344.
8. Person B, Vivas DA, Ruiz D, et al. Comparison of four energy- based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: A porcine model. Surg Endosc 2008;22:534-538.
9. Newcomb WL, Hope WW, Schmelzer TM, et al. Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc 2009;23:90-96.
10. Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, et al. Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 2003;169:697-700.
11. Campbell PA, Cresswell AB, Frank TG, et al. Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1640-1645.