Nanostructured magnesium has fewer detrimental effects on osteoblast function

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 8, Issue , 2013, Pages 1773-1781

  Weng, Lucy ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a  

^a Brown University   (United States)

Author keywords

Degradation; Detrimental effects; Nanostructured magnesium; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

BUFFER; NANOMATERIAL; NANOSTRUCTURED MAGNESIUM; PHOSPHATE; SCLEROPROTEIN; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; NANOANALYSIS; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSTEOBLAST; PH; PROTEIN SECRETION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WETTABILITY;

DEGRADATION; DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS; NANOSTRUCTURED MAGNESIUM; OSTEOBLASTS;

CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MAGNESIUM; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; POLYSTYRENES; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84877313607     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S39031     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Liu H. Bioinspired nanocomposites for orthopedic applications. In: Webster TJ, editor. Nanotechnology for the Regeneration of Hard and Soft Tissues. Toh Tuck Link, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2007.
2. R. Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2004.
3. Liu H. Biodegradable metals and responsive biosenors for musculosketal applications. In: Webster TJ, editor. Nanotechnology Enabled In Situ Sensors for Monitoring Health. New York, NY: Springer Science; 2011.
4. Wolner C, Nauer GE, Trummer J, Putz V, Tschegg S. Possible reasons for the unexpected bad biocompatibility of metal-on-metal hip implants. Mat Sci Eng. 2006;26:34-40.
5. Bohler M, Kanz F, Schwarz B, et al. Adverse tissue reactions to wear particles form Co-alloy articulations, increased by alumina-blasting particle contamination from cementless Ti-based total hip implants - a report of seven revisions with early failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84B:128-136.
6. Arnaud MJ. Update on the assessment of magnesium status. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:S24-S36.
7. Fox CH, Timm EA, Smith SJ, Touyz RM, Bush EG, Wallace PK. A method for measuring intracellular free magnesium concentration in platelets using flow cytometry. Magnes Res. 2007;20:200-207.
8. Saris NEL, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA, Lewenstam A. Magnesium - an update on physiological, clinical and analytical aspects. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;294:1-26.
9. Okuma T. Magnesium and bone strength. Nutrition. 2001;17:679-680.
10. Hartwig A. Role of magnesium in genomic stability. Mutat Res. 2001; 475:113-121.
11. Creedon A, Flynn A, Cashman K. The effect of moderately and severely restricted dietary magnesium intakes on bone composition and bone metabolism in the rat. Br J Nutr. 1999;82:63-71.
12. Belluci MM, Giro G, del Barrio RAL, Pereira RMR, Marcantonio E, Orrico SRP. Effects of magnesium intake deficiency on bone metabolism and bone tissue around osseointegrated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:716-721.
13. Toba Y, Kajita Y, Masuyama R, Takada Y, Suzuki K, Aoe S. Dietary magnesium supplementation affects bone metabolism and dynamic strength of bone in ovariectomized rats. J Nutr. 2000;130:216-220.
14. Del Barrio RAL, Giro G, Belluci MM, et al. Effect of severe dietary magnesium deficiency on systemic bone density and removal torque of osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25: 1125-1130.
15. Hussain A, Bessho K, Takahashi K, Tabata Y. Magnesium calcium phosphate as a novel component enhances mechanical/physical properties of gelatin scaffold and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:768-774.
16. Zheng YF, Gu XN, Xi YL, Chai DL. In vitro degradation and cytotoxicity of Mg/Ca composites produced by powder metallurgy. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1783-1791.
17. Salunke P, Shanov V, Witte F. High purity biodegradable magnesium coating for implant application. Mater Sci Eng. 2011;176:1711-1717.
18. Gu XN, Zhou WR, Zheng YF, et al. Corrosion fatigue behaviors of two biomedical Mg alloys - AZ91D and WE43 - in simulated body fluid. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:4605-4613.
19. Willumeit R, Fischer J, Feyerabend F, et al. Chemical surface alteration of biodegradable magnesium exposed to corrosion media. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2704-2715.
20. Lee JY, Han G, Kim YC, et al. Effects of impurities on the biodegradation behavior of pure magnesium. Met Mater Int. 2009;15:955-961.
21. Weng L, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast functions on nanostructured magnesium. Nanotechnology. 2012;23:485105.
22. Witte F, Ulrich H, Palm C, Willbold E. Biodegradable magnesium scaffolds: Part II: peri-implant bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81A:757-765.
23. Atrens A, Liu M, Zainal Abidin NI. Corrosion mechanism applicable to biodegradable magnesium implants. Mater Sci Eng B. 2011;176: 1609-1636.
24. Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;70A:129-138.
25. Price R, Haberstroh K, Webster T. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanostructured surfaces of carbon and alumina. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:372-375.
26. Liu HN, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast functions on nanophase titania dispersed in poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid composites. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:S601-S608.
27. Zhang LJ, Ramsaywack S, Fenniri H, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on self-assembled nanostructured hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14:1353-1364.