Nuclear transfer technique affects mRNA abundance, developmental competence and cell fate of the reconstituted sheep oocytes

Reproduction

Volumn 145, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 345-355

  Moulavi, F ^a   Hosseini, S M ^a   Hajian, M ^a   Forouzanfar, M ^a   Abedi, P ^a   Ostadhosseini, S ^a   Asgari, V ^a   Nasr Esfahani, M H ^a  

^a ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MESSENGER RNA; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL FATE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; IN VITRO STUDY; INNER CELL MASS; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER; SOMATIC CELL THERAPY;

ANIMALS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; OOCYTES; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, MESSENGER; SHEEP;

EID: 84877289359     PISSN: 14701626     EISSN: 17417899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1530/REP-12-0318     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Asgari V, Hosseini SM, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M & Nasr-Esfahani MH 2011 Time dependent effect of post warming interval on micro-tubule organization, meiotic status, and parthenogenetic activation of vitrified in vitro matured sheep oocytes. Theriogenology 75 904-910. (doi:10.1016/j. theriogenology.2010.10.033)
2. Betthauser JM, Pfister-Genskow M, Xu H, Golueke PJ, Lacson JC, Koppang RW, Myers C, Liu B, Hoeschele I, Eilertsen KJ et al. 2006 Nucleoplasmin facilitates reprogramming and in vivo development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 73 977-986. (doi:10.1002/mrd. 20493)
3. Dietrich JE & Hiiragi T 2007 Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo. Development 134 4219-4231. (doi:10.1242/dev.003798)
4. Gardner RL 2007 The axis of polarity of the mouse blastocyst is specified before blastulation and independently of the zona pellucida. Human Reproduction 22 798-806. (doi:10.1093/humrep/del424)
5. Gonzalez MA, Tachibana KE, Adams DJ, van der WeydenL, HembergerM, Coleman N, Bradley A & Laskey RA 2006 Geminin is essential to prevent endoreduplication and to form pluripotent cells during mammalian development. Genes and Development 15 1880-1884. (doi:10.1101/gad.379706)
6. Hajian M, Hosseini SM, Forouzanfar M, Abedi P, Ostadhosseini S, Hosseini L, Moulavi F, Gourabi H & Shahverdi AH 2011 "Conservation cloning" of vulnerable Esfahan mouflon (Ovis orientalis isphahanica): in vitro and in vivo studies. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57 959-969. (doi:10.1007/s10344-011-0510-5)
7. Hansis C, Tang YX, Grifo JA & Krey LC 2001 Analysis of Oct-4 expression and ploidy in individual human blastomeres. Molecular Human Reproduction 7 155-161. (doi:10.1093/molehr/7.2.155)
8. Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Moulavi F, Shahverdi AH & Nasr-Esfahani MH 2006 Optimized combined electrical and chemical activation of in vitro matured bovine oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science 108 122-133. (doi:10.1016/j. anireprosci.2007.07.011)
9. Hosseini SM, Moulavi F, Foruzanfar M, Hajian M, Abedi P, Rezazade-Valojerdi M, Parivar K, Shahverdi AH & Nasr-Esfahani MH 2008 Effect of donor cell type and gender on the efficiency of in vitro sheep somatic cell cloning. Small Ruminant Research 78 162-168. (doi:10.1016/j.small-rumres.2008. 06.004)
10. Hosseini SM, Asgari V, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M & Nasr-Esfahani MH 2012a Specific activation requirements of in vitro matured sheep oocytes following vitrification-warming. Molecular Reproduction and Development 79 434-444. (doi:10.1002/mrd.22047)
11. Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Foruzanfar M, Moulavi F, Ostadhosseini S, Abedi P, Asgari V, Abbasi H, Tanhaie S, Jafarpour F et al. 2012b Enucleated ovine oocyte supports human somatic cells reprogramming back to the embryonic stage. Cellular Reprogramming 4 155-163. (doi:10.1089/cell.2011.0061)
12. Jafari S, Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Jafarpour F, Abedi P, Ostadhosseini S, Abbasi H, Gourabi H, Shahverdi AH et al. 2011a Improved in vitro development of cloned bovine embryos using S-adenosylhomocysteine, a non-toxic epigenetic modifying reagent. Molecular Reproduction and Development 78 576-584. (doi:10.1002/mrd.21344)
13. Jafari S, Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Jafarpour F, Abedi P, Ostadhosseini S, Abbasi H, Gourabi H, Shahverdi AH et al. 2011b Epigenetic modification does not determine the time of POU5F1 transcription activation in cloned bovine embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 28 1119-1127. (doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9638-1)
14. Jafarpour F, Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Jafarpour F, Abedi P, Ostadhosseini S, Abbasi H, Gourabi H, Shahverdi AH et al. 2011 Somatic cell induced hyperacetylation, but not hypomethylation, positively and reversibly affect the efficiency of in vitro cloned blastocyst production in cattle. Cellular Reprogramming13 483-493. (doi:10.1089/cell.2011.0005)
15. Katayama M, Ellersieck MR & Roberts RM 2010 Development of monozygotic twin mouse embryos from the time of blastomere separation at the two-cell stage to blastocyst. Biology of Reproduction 82 1237-1247. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.082982)
16. Kazemi-Ashtiani S, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Hosseini SM, Moulavi F, Hajian M, Fouzanfar M, Abedi P, Meamar M, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Gourabi H et al. 2008 Royana: successful experience in cloning the sheep. Cell Journal 10 193-200.
17. Kurotaki Y, Hatta K, Nakao K, Nabeshima Y & Fujimori T 2007 Blastocyst axis is specified independently of early cell lineage but aligns with the ZP shape. Science 316 719-723. (doi:10.1126/science.1138591)
18. Latham KE 2005 Early and delayed aspects of nuclear reprogramming during cloning. Biology of the Cell 97 119-132. (doi:10.1042/BC20040068)
19. Lee JW, Wu SC, Tian XC, Barber M, Hoagland T, Riesen J, Lee KH, Tu CF, Cheng WT & Yang X 2003 Production of cloned pigs by whole-cell intracytoplasmic microinjection. Biology of Reproduction 69 995-1001. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.015917)
20. Loi P, Ledda S, Fulka J Jr, Cappai P & Moor RM 1998 Development of parthenogenetic and cloned ovine embryos: effect of activation protocols. Biology of Reproduction 581177-1187. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod58.5.1177)
21. Marikawa Y & Alarcón VB 2009 Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo. Molecular Reproduction and Development 76 1019-1032. (doi:10.1002/mrd.21057)
22. Mitalipov SM, Zhou Q, Byrne JA, Ji WZ, Norgren RB & Wolf DP 2007 Reprogramming following somatic cell nuclear transfer in primates is dependentuponnuclearre modeling. Human Reproduction222232-2242. (doi:10.1093/humrep/dem136)
23. Moulavi F, Hosseini SM, Ashtiani SK, Shahverdi A & Nasr-Esfahani MH 2006 Can Vero cell co-culture improve in-vitro maturation of bovine oocytes? Reproductive Biomedicine Online 13 404-411. (doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61446-0)
24. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Ostadhosseini S, Abedi P, Khazaie Y, Dormiani K, Ghaedi K, Forozanfar M et al. 2011 Development of an optimized zona-free method of somatic cell nuclear transfer in the goat. Cellular Reprogramming 13 157-170. (doi:10.1089/cell.2010.0083)
25. Oback B & Wells D 2002 Practical aspects of donor cell selection for nuclear cloning. Cloning and Stem Cells 4 169-174. (doi:10.1089/ 153623002320253337)
26. Oback B, Wiersema AT, Gaynor P, Laible G, Tucker FC, Oliver JE, Miller AL, Troskie HE, Wilson KL, Forsyth JT et al. 2003 Cloned cattle derived from a novel zona-free embryo reconstruction system. Cloning and Stem Cells 5 3-12. (doi:10.1089/153623003321512111)
27. Peter M, Nakagawa J, Dorée M, Labbé JC & Nigg EA 1990 In vitro disassembly of the nuclear lamina and M phase-specific phosphorylation of lamins by cdc2 kinase. Cell 18 591-602. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90471-P)
28. Schurmann A, Wells DN & Oback B 2006 Early zygotes are suitable recipients for bovine somatic nuclear transfer and result in cloned offspring. Reproduction 132 839-848. (doi:10.1530/REP-06-0054)
29. Sung LY, Shen PC, Jeong BS, Xu J, Chang CC, Cheng WT, Wu JS, Lee SN, Broek D, Faber D et al. 2007 Premature chromosome condensation is not essential for nuclear reprogramming in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction 76 232-240. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod. 106.053561)
30. Sylvestre EL, Pennetier S, Bureau M, Robert C & Sirard MA 2010 Investigating the potential of genes preferentially expressed in oocyte to induce chromatin remodeling in somatic cells. Cellular Reprogramming 12 519-528. (doi:10.1089/cell.2010.0012)
31. Tamada H, Van Thuan N, Reed P, Nelson D, Katoku-Kikyo N, Wudel J, Wakayama T & Kikyo N 2006 Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reprogramming by nucleoplasmin. Molecular and Cellular Biology 26 1259-1271. (doi:10.1128/MCB.26.4.1259-1271.2006)
32. Tervit HR, Whittingham DG & Rowson LE 1972 Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 30 493-497. (doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0300493)
33. Vajta G, Peura TT, Holm P, Páldi A, Greve T, Trounson AO & Callesen H 2000 New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: the well of the well (WOW) system. Molecular Reproduction and Development 55 256-264. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200003)55: 3<256::AID-MRD3>3.0.CO;2- 7)
34. Vallée M, Aiba K, Piao Y, Palin MF, Ko MS & Sirard MA 2008 Comparative analysis of oocyte transcript profiles reveals a high degree of conservation among species. Reproduction 135 439-448. (doi:10.1530/REP-07-0342)
35. Verma PJ & Trounson A 2006 Nuclear transfer protocols: Cell reprogramming and transgenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology 346 85-130.
36. Vigneault C, Gravel C, Vallée M, McGraw S & Sirard MA 2009 Unveiling the bovine embryo transcriptome during the maternal-to-embryonic transition. Reproduction 137 245-257. (doi:10.1530/REP-08-0079)
37. Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR & Yanagimachi R 1998 Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394 369-374. (doi:10.1038/28615)
38. Wells DN, Forsyth JT, McMillan V & Oback B 2004 The health of somatic cell cloned cattle and their offspring. Cloning and Stem Cells 4 101-110. (doi:10.1089/1536230041372300)
39. Wilmut I 2003 A new era in methods of embryo manipulation? Cloning and Stem Cells 5 1-2. (doi:10.1089/153623003321512102)
40. Wrenzycki C, Wells D, Herrmann D, Miller A, Oliver J, Tervit R & Niemann H 2001 Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patternsincloned bovine blastocysts. Biology of Reproduction 65 309-317. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod65.1.309)
41. Yang VS, Carter SA, Hyland SJ, Tachibana-Konwalski K, Laskey RA & Gonzalez MA 2011 Geminin escapes degradation in G1 of mouse pluripotent cells and mediates the expression of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. Current Biology 26 692-699. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.026)
42. Zernicka-Goetz M, Morris SA & Bruce AW 2009 Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nature Reviews. Genetics 10 467-477. (doi:10.1038/nrg2564)
43. Zhou Q, Yang SH, Ding CH, He XC, Xie YH, Hildebrandt TB, Mitalipov SM, Tang XH, Wolf DP & Ji WZ 2006 A comparative approach to somatic cell nuclear transfer in the rhesus monkey. Human Reproduction 21 2564-2571. (doi:10.1093/humrep/del216)
44. Zuccotti M, Merico V, Sacchi L, Bellone M, Brink TC, Bellazzi R, Stefanelli M, Redi CA, Garagna S & Adjaye J 2008 Maternal Oct-4 is a potential key regulator of the developmental competence of mouse oocytes. BMC Developmental Biology 8 97. (doi:10.1186/1471-213X-8-97)