Specific activation requirements of in vitro-matured sheep oocytes following vitrification-warming

Molecular Reproduction and Development

Volumn 79, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 434-444

  Asgari, V ^a   Hosseini, S M ^a   Ostadhosseini, S ^a   Hajian, M ^a   Azhdari, Z T ^a   Mosaie, M ^a   Nasr Esfahani, M H ^a  

^a ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IONOMYCIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VITRO OOCYTE MATURATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VITRIFICATION; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; EMBRYO CULTURE TECHNIQUES; HEATING; IN VITRO OOCYTE MATURATION TECHNIQUES; IONOMYCIN; OOCYTES; OOGENESIS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SHEEP; VITRIFICATION; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84863467708     PISSN: 1040452X     EISSN: 10982795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22047     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albertini DF. 1992. Cytoplasmic microtubular dynamics and chromatin organization during mammalian oogenesis and oocyte maturation. Mutat Res 296: 57- 68.
2. Alberio R, Zakhartchenko V, Motlik J, Wolf E. 2001. Mammalian oocyte activation: Lessons from the sperm and implications for nuclear transfer. Int J Dev Biol 45: 797- 809.
3. Asgari V, Hosseini SM, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2011. Time dependent effect of post warming interval on microtubule organization, meiotic status, and parthenogenetic activation of vitrified in vitro matured sheep oocytes. Theriogenology 75: 904- 910.
4. Atabay EC, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Nagano M, Koga A, Kanai Y. 2004. Vitrification of bovine oocytes and its application to intergeneric somatic cell nucleus transfer. Theriogenology 61: 15- 23.
5. Ben-Yosef D, Shalgi R. 1998. Early ionic events in activation of the mammalian egg. Reproduction 3: 96- 103.
6. Bernard A, Fuller BJ. 1996. Cryopreservation of human oocytes: A review of current problems and perspectives. Hum Reprod Update 2: 193- 207.
7. Bonetti A, Cervi M, Tomei F, Marchini M, Ortolani F, Manno M. 2011. Ultrastructural evaluation of human metaphase II oocytes after vitrification: Closed versus open devices. Fertil Steril 95: 928- 935.
8. Brevini TAL, Pennarossa G, Antonini S, Gandolfi F. 2008. Parthenogenesis as an approach to pluripotency: Advantages and limitations Involved. Stem Cell Rev 4: 127- 135.
9. Diez C, Duque P, Gómez E, Hidalgo CO, Tamargo C, Rodríguez A, Fernández L, de la Varga S, Fernández A, Facal N, Carbajo M. 2005. Bovine oocyte vitrification before or after meiotic arrest: Effects on ultrastructure and developmental ability. Theriogenology 15: 317- 333.
10. Fabbri R. 2006. Cryopreservation of human oocytes and ovarian tissue. Cell Tissue Bank 7: 113- 122.
11. Ferreira EM, Vireque AA, Adona PR, Meirelles FV, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. 2009. Cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes: Structural and biochemical modifications and acquisition of developmental competence. Theriogenology 71: 836- 848.
12. Gasparrini B, Francesco SD, Rubessa M, Velotto S, Mariotti E, Blasi MD. 2009. Structural changes of in vitro matured buffalo and bovine oocytes following cryopreservation. Ital J Anim Sci 8: 90- 92.
13. Gordon I. 2003. Laboratory production of cattle embryos, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: CABI Publishing. pp 114- 117.
14. Gurdon JB, Wilmut I. 2011. Nuclear transfer to eggs and oocytes. In: Prospectives in biology. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press. pp 1- 14.
15. Hajian M, Hosseini SM, Forouzanfar M, Abedi P, Ostadhosseini S, Hosseini L, Moulavi F, Gourabi H, Shahverdi AH, Vosough Taghi Dizaj A. 2011. Conservation cloning of vulnerable Esfahan mouflon (Ovis orientalis isphahanica): In vitro and in vivo studies. Eur J Wildl Res 57: 959- 969.
16. Herrero L, Martínez M, Garcia-Velasco JA. 2011. Current status of human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23: 245- 250.
17. Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Moulavi F, Shahverdi AH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2008a. Optimized combined electrical-chemical parthenogenetic activation for in vitro matured bovine oocytes. Anim Reprod Sci 108: 122- 133.
18. Hosseini SM, Moulavi F, Hajian M, Abedi P, Forouzanfar M, Ostad Hosseini S, Hosseini L, Pirestani A, Ghasemzadeh Nava H, Tajik P, Shahverdi AH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2008b. Highly efficient in vitro production of bovine blastocyst in cell-free sequential synthetic oviductal fluid vs. TCM199 vero cell co-culture system. IJFS 2: 66- 73.
19. Hosseini SM, Asgari V, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Piryaei A, Najjarasl M, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2012. Potential application of sheep oocytes as affected by vitrification and in vitro aging. Theriogenology 1741- 1753.
20. (cdc2), cyclin B1, cdc25C, and wee1 in meiotically incompetent and competent oocytes. Biol Reprod 63: 1610- 1616.
21. Kitagawaa Y, Suzukib K, Yonedaa A, Watanabea T. 2004. Effects of oxygen concentration and antioxidants on the in vitro developmental ability, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and DNA fragmentation in porcine embryos. Theriogenology 62: 1186- 1197.
22. Lan GC, Han D, Wu YG, Han ZB, Ma SF, Liu XY, Chang CL, Tan JH. 2005. Effects of duration, concentration, and timing of ionomycin and 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) treatment on activation of goat oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 71: 380- 388.
23. Larman MG, Sheehan CB, Gardner DK. 2006. Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse oocytes. Reproduction 131: 53- 61.
24. Larman MG, Katz-Jaffe MG, Sheehan CB, Gardner DK. 2007. 1, 2-Propanediol and the type of cryopreservation procedure adversely affect mouse oocyte physiology. Hum Reprod 22: 250- 259.
25. Liang Y, Phermthai T, Nagai T, Somfai T, Parnpai R. 2011. In vitro development of vitrified buffalo oocytes following parthenogenetic activation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Theriogenology 75: 1652- 1660.
26. Loi P, Ledda S, Fulka J, Cappai P, Moor RM. 1998. Development of parthenogenetic and cloned ovine embryos: Effect of activation protocols. Biol Reprod 58: 1177- 1187.
27. Macháty Z, Ramsoondar JJ, Bonk AJ, Bondioli KR, Prather RS. 2002. Capacitative calcium entry mechanism in porcine oocytes. Biol Reprod 66: 667- 674.
28. McGuinness OM, Moreton RB, Johnson MH, Berridge MJ. 1996. A direct measurement of increased divalent cation influx in fertilised mouse oocytes. Development 122: 2199- 2206.
29. Men H, Monson RL, Parrish JJ, Rutledge JJ. 2003. Detection of DNA damage in bovine metaphase II oocytes resulting from cryopreservation. Mol Reprod Dev 64: 245- 250.
30. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi Sh, Mardani M, Shirazi R, Javanmardi S. 2007. Effects of failed oocyte activation and sperm protamine deficiency on fertilization post-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 14: 422- 429.
31. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Deemeh MR, Tavalaee M. 2010. Artificial oocyte activation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 94: 520- 526.
32. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Hosseini SM, Hajian M, Forouzanfar M, Ostadhosseini S, Abedi P, Khazaie Y, Dormiani K, Ghaedi K, Forozanfar M, Gourabi H, Shahverdi AH, Vosough AD, Vojgani H. 2011. Development of an optimized zona-free method of somatic cell nuclear transfer in the goat. Cell Reprogram 13: 157- 170.
33. Noggle S, Fung HL, Gore A, Martinez H, Satriani KC, Prosser R, Oum K, Paull D, Druckenmiller S, Freeby M, Greenberg E, Zhang K, Goland R, Sauer MV, Leibel RL, Egli D. 2011. Human oocytes reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state. Nature 7367: 70- 75.
34. Saragusty J, Arav A. 2011. Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. Reproduction (Review) 141: 1- 19.
35. Saunders KM, Parks JE. 1999. Effects of cryopreservation procedures on the cytology and fertilization rate of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 61: 178- 187.
36. Stice SL, Keefer CL, Matthews L. 1994. Bovine nuclear transfer embryos: Oocyte activation prior to blastomere fusion. Mol Reprod Dev 38: 61- 68.
37. Succu S, Leoni GG, Bebbere D, Beringuer F, Mossa F, Bogliolo L, Madeddu M, Ledda S, Naitana S. 2007. Vitrification devices affect structural and molecular status of in vitro mature ovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 74: 1337- 1344.
38. Suzuki H, Cherng Ju J, Yang X. 2000. Surface ultrastructural alterations of bovine oocytes after parthenogenetic activation. Cloning 2: 69- 78.
39. Tian SJ, Yan CL, Yang HX, Zhou GB, Yang ZQ, Zhu SE. 2007. Vitrification solution containing DMSO and EG can induce parthenogenetic activation of in vitro matured ovine oocytes and decrease sperm penetration. Anim Reprod Sci 101: 365- 371.
40. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Prather RS, Day BN. 1998. Functional analysis of activation of porcine oocytes by spermatozoa, calcium ionophore, and electrical pulse. Mol Reprod Dev 51: 346- 353.
41. Zhou GB, Li N. 2009. Cryopreservation of porcine oocytes: Recent advances. Mol Hum Reprod 15: 279- 285.