Discrepancy between the quantitative ultrasound value of malaysian men and the manufacturer's reference and the impact on classification of bone health status

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 189-195

  Chin, Kok Yong ^a   Soelaiman, Ima Nirwana ^a   Mohamed, Isa Naina ^a   Mohamed, Norazlina ^a   Shuid, Ahmad Nazrun ^a   Muhammad, Norliza ^a   Wan Ngah, Wan Zurinah ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Malaysian; Male; Normative value; Quantitative ultrasound; Speed of sounds

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BONE; CHINESE; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; ECHOGRAPH; ECHOGRAPHY; ETHNICITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; JAPANESE; MALAYSIA; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SOUND;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DISEASES, METABOLIC; CALCANEUS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALAYSIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877066896     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: 15590747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Doran P.M., Khosla S. Osteoporosis. Contemporary endocrinology: handbook of diagnostic endocrinology 2003, 257-275. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. J.E. Hall, L.K. Nieman (Eds.).
2. Melton L.J., Atkinson E.J., O'Connor M.K., et al. Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 1998, 13:1915-1923.
3. Bliuc D., Nguyen N.D., Milch V.E., et al. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 2009, 301:513-521.
4. Burge R., Dawson-Hughes B., Solomon D.H., et al. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:465-475.
5. Adler R.A. Osteoporosis in men. Contemporary endocrinology: osteoporosis: pathophysiology and clinical management 2010, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. R.A. Adler (Ed.).
6. Laugier P. An overview of bone sonometry. Int Congress Ser 2004, 1274:23-32.
7. Trimpou P., Bosaeus I., Landin-Wihelmsen K. High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. Eur J Radiol 2010, 73:360-364.
8. Pluskiewicz W., Drozdzowska B. Ultrasonic measurement of the calcaneus in Polish normal and osteoporotic women and men. Bone 1999, 24:611-617.
9. Moayyeri A., Adams J., Adler R., et al. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: an updated meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2012, 23:143-153.
10. Gluer C.-C. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. J Bone Miner Res 1997, 12:1280-1288.
11. Krieg M.A., Barkmann R., Gonnelli S., et al. Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 2008, 11(1):163-187.
12. Hien V.T.T., Khan N.C., Lam N.T., et al. Determining the prevalence of osteoporosis and related factors using quantitative ultrasound in Vietnamese adult women. Am J Epidemiol 2005, 191:824-830.
13. Kurmanji J.M., Sulaiman S.A.S., Kah L.K., Chandrasekaran P.K. Depression and low bone mineral density: the correlation among Chinese. Asian J Psychiatr 2010, 3:134-137.
14. Miura S., Saavedra O.L., Yamamoto S. Osteoporosis in urban post-menopausal women of the Philippines: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Osteoporos 2008, 3:17-24.
15. Tseng Y.-H., Huang K.-C., Liu M.-L., et al. Association between metabolic syndrome (MS) and bone mineral loss: a cross-sectional study in Puli Township in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009, 49:37-40.
16. Tsuchihara T., Yanagida S., Tsukazaki S., et al. Bone mass assessment in naval crew members by quantitative ultrasound technique. J Orthop Sci 2009, 14:693-698.
17. Chin K.Y., Ima-Nirwana S., Isa Naina M., et al. Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound value for middle-aged and elderly Malaysian Chinese men and its association with age and body anthropometry. J Clin Densitom 2011, 15(1):86-91.
18. Buchner A, Erdfelder E, Faul F. 1997 How to use G*Power. Available at: Assessed: January 2, 2012. http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/how_to_use_gpower.htm.
19. Kishimoto H., Yoh K., Ohta H., et al. Normative data and cut-off values determined using quantitative ultrasound CM-100 in Japanese women. Osteoporosis Japan 2003, 11:129-132.
20. Frost M.L., Blake G.M., Fogelman I. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11:321-330.
21. International Osteoporosis Foundation The Asian audit: epidemiology, cost and burden of osteoporosis in Asia 2009 2009, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Switzerland.
22. Hans D., Wu C., Njeh C.F., et al. Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity. Calcif Tissue Int 1999, 64:18-23.
23. Guglielmi G., de Terlizzi F. Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71:425-431.
24. Töyräs J., Nieminen M.T., Kröger H., Jurvelin J.S. Bone mineral density, ultrasound velocity, and broadband attenuation predict mechanical properties of trabecular bone differently. Bone 2002, 31:503-507.
25. Cortet B., Boutry N., Dubois P., et al. Does quantitative ultrasound of bone reflect more bone mineral density than bone microarchitecture?. Calcif Tissue Int 2003, 74:60-67.
26. Tylavsky F.A., Carbone L.D., Bush A.J. Effects of ethnicity and gender on reliable measurements using the Sahara ultrasonometer. J Clin Densitom 2002, 5:411-419.
27. Riggs B.L., Melton L.J., Robb R.A., et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:1945-1954.