Use of a PEG-conjugated bright near-infrared dye for functional imaging of rerouting of tumor lymphatic drainage after sentinel lymph node metastasis

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 5128-5137

  Proulx, Steven T ^a   Luciani, Paola ^a   Christiansen, Ailsa ^a   Karaman, Sinem ^a   Blum, Katrin S ^a   Rinderknecht, Matthias ^a   Leroux, Jean Christophe ^a   Detmar, Michael ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Liposomes; Lymph node; Lymphatic vessels; Metastasis; Non invasive imaging of animal models; Polymers

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHATIC VESSELS; METASTASIS; METASTATIC LYMPH NODES; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE MAPPING; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;

BODY FLUIDS; DERMATOLOGY; DISEASES; INFRARED DEVICES; LIPOSOMES; ONCOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT TREATMENT; POLYMERS; TUMORS;

DIAGNOSIS;

MACROGOL;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLUMINESCENCE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOT PAD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; IN VIVO STUDY; LYMPH VESSEL; LYMPHATIC DRAINAGE; MELANOMA; MOUSE; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTUM YIELD; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; STEREOMICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; COLORING AGENTS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; INFRARED RAYS; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; LYMPHATIC VESSELS; MICE; PERFUSION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84877019122     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.034     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alitalo K. The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nat Med 2011, 17:1371-1380.
2. Van den Eynden G.G., Vandenberghe M.K., van Dam P.J., Colpaert C.G., van Dam P., Dirix L.Y., et al. Increased sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis is associated with nonsentinel axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13:5391-5397.
3. Mumprecht V., Detmar M. Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. JCell Mol Med 2009, 13:1405-1416.
4. Giuliano A.E., Kirgan D.M., Guenther J.M., Morton D.L. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994, 220:391-398. [discussion 8-401].
5. Sleeman J.P., Nazarenko I., Thiele W. Do all roads lead to Rome? Routes to metastasis development. Int J Cancer 2011, 128:2511-2526.
6. Swartz M.A. The physiology of the lymphatic system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 50:3-20.
7. Schmid-Schonbein G.W. Microlymphatics and lymph flow. Physiol Rev 1990, 70:987-1028.
8. Padera T.P., Kadambi A., di Tomaso E., Carreira C.M., Brown E.B., Boucher Y., et al. Lymphatic metastasis in the absence of functional intratumor lymphatics. Science 2002, 296:1883-1886.
9. Harrell M.I., Iritani B.M., Ruddell A. Tumor-induced sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and increased lymph flow precede melanoma metastasis. Am J Pathol 2007, 170:774-786.
10. Proulx S.T., Luciani P., Derzsi S., Rinderknecht M., Mumprecht V., Leroux J.C., et al. Quantitative imaging of lymphatic function with liposomal indocyanine green. Cancer Res 2010, 70:7053-7062.
11. Hoshida T., Isaka N., Hagendoorn J., di Tomaso E., Chen Y.L., Pytowski B., et al. Imaging steps of lymphatic metastasis reveals that vascular endothelial growth factor-C increases metastasis by increasing delivery of cancer cells to lymph nodes: therapeutic implications. Cancer Res 2006, 66:8065-8075.
12. Dadiani M., Kalchenko V., Yosepovich A., Margalit R., Hassid Y., Degani H., et al. Real-time imaging of lymphogenic metastasis in orthotopic human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2006, 66:8037-8041.
13. Zawieja D.C. Contractile physiology of lymphatics. Lymphat Res Biol 2009, 7:87-96.
14. Liao S., Cheng G., Conner D.A., Huang Y., Kucherlapati R.S., Munn L.L., et al. Impaired lymphatic contraction associated with immunosuppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:18784-18789.
15. Zhang F., Niu G., Lu G., Chen X. Preclinical lymphatic imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 2011, 13:599-612.
16. Mumprecht V., Honer M., Vigl B., Proulx S.T., Trachsel E., Kaspar M., et al. Invivo imaging of inflammation- and tumor-induced lymph node lymphangiogenesis by immuno-positron emission tomography. Cancer Res 2010, 70:8842-8851.
17. Proulx S.T., Kwok E., You Z., Beck C.A., Shealy D.J., Ritchlin C.T., et al. MRI and quantification of draining lymph node function in inflammatory arthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007, 1117:106-123.
18. Ruddell A., Harrell M.I., Minoshima S., Maravilla K.R., Iritani B.M., White S.W., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumor-induced lymph flow. Neoplasia 2008, 10:706-713.
19. Sharma R., Wendt J.A., Rasmussen J.C., Adams K.E., Marshall M.V., Sevick-Muraca E.M. New horizons for imaging lymphatic function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1131:13-36.
20. Kwon S., Sevick-Muraca E.M. Functional lymphatic imaging in tumor-bearing mice. JImmunol Methods 2010, 360:167-172.
21. Zhou Q., Wood R., Schwarz E.M., Wang Y.J., Xing L. Near-infrared lymphatic imaging demonstrates the dynamics of lymph flow and lymphangiogenesis during the acute versus chronic phases of arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum 2010, 62:1881-1889.
22. Kim S., Lim Y.T., Soltesz E.G., De Grand A.M., Lee J., Nakayama A., et al. Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:93-97.
23. Kosaka N., Ogawa M., Sato N., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. Invivo real-time, multicolor, quantum dot lymphatic imaging. JInvest Dermatol 2009, 129:2818-2822.
24. Rasmussen J.C., Tan I.C., Marshall M.V., Fife C.E., Sevick-Muraca E.M. Lymphatic imaging in humans with near-infrared fluorescence. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009, 20:74-82.
25. Gashev A.A., Nagai T., Bridenbaugh E.A. Indocyanine green and lymphatic imaging: current problems. Lymphat Res Biol 2010, 8:127-130.
26. Proulx S.T., Luciani P., Alitalo A., Mumprecht V., Christiansen A.J., Huggenberger R., et al. Non-invasive dynamic near-infrared imaging and quantification of vascular leakage invivo. Angiogenesis 2013, 10.1007/s10456-013-9332-2.
27. Gretz J.E., Norbury C.C., Anderson A.O., Proudfoot A.E., Shaw S. Lymph-borne chemokines and other low molecular weight molecules reach high endothelial venules via specialized conduits while a functional barrier limits access to the lymphocyte microenvironments in lymph node cortex. JExp Med 2000, 192:1425-1440.
28. Trichas G., Begbie J., Srinivas S. Use of the viral 2A peptide for bicistronic expression in transgenic mice. BMC Biol 2008, 6:40.
29. Mayerson H. The physiologic importance of lymph. Circulation 1963, 1035-1073. American Physiological Society, Washington, DC. W. Hamilton (Ed.).
30. Leu A.J., Berk D.A., Yuan F., Jain R.K. Flow velocity in the superficial lymphatic network of the mouse tail. Am J Physiol 1994, 267:H1507-H1513.
31. Aukland K., Reed R.K. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiol Rev 1993, 73:1-78.
32. Schmid-Schonbein G.W. The second valve system in lymphatics. Lymphat Res Biol 2003, 1:25-29. [discussion 9-31].
33. Baluk P., Fuxe J., Hashizume H., Romano T., Lashnits E., Butz S., et al. Functionally specialized junctions between endothelial cells of lymphatic vessels. JExp Med 2007, 204:2349-2362.
34. McHale N.G., Roddie I.C. The effect of transmural pressure on pumping activity in isolated bovine lymphatic vessels. JPhysiol 1976, 261:255-269.
35. Gashev A.A., Davis M.J., Gasheva O.Y., Nepiushchikh Z.V., Wang W., Dougherty P., et al. Methods for lymphatic vessel culture and gene transfection. Microcirculation 2009, 16:615-628.
36. Smith R.O. Lymphatic contractility; a possible intrinsic mechanism of lymphatic vessels for the transport of lymph. JExp Med 1949, 90:497-509.
37. Ono N., Mizuno R., Nojiri H., Ohhashi T. Development of an experimental apparatus for investigating lymphatic pumping activity of murine mesentery invivo. Jpn J Physiol 2000, 50:25-31.
38. Isaka N., Padera T.P., Hagendoorn J., Fukumura D., Jain R.K. Peritumor lymphatics induced by vascular endothelial growth factor-C exhibit abnormal function. Cancer Res 2004, 64:4400-4404.
39. Wu T.F., Carati C.J., Macnaughton W.K., von der Weid P.Y. Contractile activity of lymphatic vessels is altered in the TNBS model of guinea pig ileitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 291:G566-74.
40. Davis M.J., Rahbar E., Gashev A.A., Zawieja D.C., Moore J.E. Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011, 301:H48-H60.
41. Von Der Weid P.Y., Rehal S. Lymphatic pump function in the inflamed gut. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010, 1207(Suppl. 1):E69-E74.
42. Nakaya K., Mizuno R., Ohhashi T. B16-BL6 melanoma cells release inhibitory factor(s) of active pump activity in isolated lymph vessels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001, 281:C1812-C1818.
43. Van De Velde C.J., Van Putten L.M., Zwaveling A. Anew metastasizing mammary carcinoma model in mice: model characteristics and applications. Eur J Cancer 1977, 13:555-565.
44. Browse N.L., Doig R.L., Sizeland D. The resistance of a lymph node to lymph flow. Br J Surg 1984, 71:192-196.
45. Nagai T., Ikomi F., Suzuki S., Ohhashi T. In situ lymph dynamic characterization through lymph nodes in rabbit hind leg: special reference to nodal inflammation. JPhysiol Sci 2008, 58:123-132.
46. Adair T.H., Moffatt D.S., Paulsen A.W., Guyton A.C. Quantitation of changes in lymph protein concentration during lymph node transit. Am J Physiol 1982, 243:H351-H359.
47. Lam T.K., Uren R.F., Scolyer R.A., Quinn M.J., Shannon K.F., Thompson J.F. False-negative sentinel node biopsy because of obstruction of lymphatics bymetastatic melanoma: the value of ultrasound in conjunction with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Melanoma Res 2009, 19:94-99.
48. Leijte J.A., van der Ploeg I.M., Valdes Olmos R.A., Nieweg O.E., Horenblas S. Visualization of tumor blockage and rerouting of lymphatic drainage in penile cancer patients by use of SPECT/CT. JNucl Med 2009, 50:364-367.
49. Nathanson S.D., Mahan M. Sentinel lymph node pressure in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:3791-3796.