Comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: The assessing angiography (A2) project

Circulation

Volumn 127, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 1793-1800

  Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ^a   Spertus, John A ^b   Lansky, Alexandra J ^c   Cohen, David J ^b   Jones, Philip G ^b   Kureshi, Faraz ^b   Dehmer, Gregory J ^d   Drozda, Joseph P ^e   Walsh, Mary Norine ^f   Brush, John E ^g   Koenig, Gerald C ^h   Waites, Thad F ⁱ   Gantt, D Scott ^d   Kichura, George ^e   Chazal, Richard A ^j   O'Brien, Peter K ^k   Valentine, C Michael ^k   Rumsfeld, John S ^l   Reiber, Johan H C ^m   Elmore, Joann G ⁿ   Krumholz, Richard A ^o   Weaver, W Douglas ^h   Krumholz, Harlan M ^c,p   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d TEXAS A M COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Mercy Health Research   (United States)

^f St Vincent s Heart Center of Indiana   (United States)

^g EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ Advanced Pain Therapy   (United States)

^j Lee Memorial Health System   (United States)

^k Lynchburg General Hospital   (United States)

^l VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^o ImageCor   (United States)

^p YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Health policy; Outcome assessment (health care); Percutaneous coronary intervention; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISEASE REGISTRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84876986910     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001952     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet A.M., Carabello B., Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, Legako RD, Leon D.F., Murray JA, Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Watson R.M., Ritchie JL, Gibbons RJ, Cheitlin MD, Gardner TJ, Garson A Jr, Russell RO Jr, Ryan TJ, Smith SC Jr. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 1999;99:2345-2357.
2. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship J.C., Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers C.E., Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot U.N., Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124:e574-e651.
3. Marcus ML, Skorton DJ, Johnson M.R., Collins SM, Harrison DG, Kerber RE Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard.". J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:882-885.
4. Raphael MJ, Donaldson RM A "significant" stenosis: thirty years on. Lancet. 1989;1:207-209.
5. Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy M.L., Takaro T. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1975;52:979-986.
6. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation. 1977;55:324-328.
7. Galbraith JE, Murphy ML, de Soyza N. Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability. JAMA. 1978;240:2053-2056.
8. Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J, Cameron A., Swaye P, Ryan T, Maynard C., Bourassa M, Kennedy JW, Gosselin A, Kemp H., Faxon D, Wexler L, Davis KB. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982;8:565-575.
9. Goldberg RK, Kleiman NS, Minor S.T., Abukhalil J., Raizner AE Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. Am Heart J. 1990;119:178-184.
10. Fleming RM, Kirkeeide RL, Smalling R.W., Gould KL Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:945-951.
11. Desmet W, Willems J, Van Lierde J, Piessens J. Discrepancy between visual estimation and computer-assisted measurement of lesion severity before and after coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994;31:192-198.
12. Folland ED, Vogel RA, Hartigan P, Bates E.R., Beauman GJ, Fortin T, Boucher C, Parisi AF Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: the Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. Circulation. 1994;89:2005-2014.
13. Leape LL, Park RE, Bashore T.M., Harrison JK, Davidson CJ, Brook RH Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization procedures. Am Heart J. 2000;139(pt 1):106-113.
14. Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A., Byrne JG, Cavendish JJ, Chambers CE, Hermiller JB Jr, Kinlay S, Landzberg JS, Laskey W.K., McKay CR, Miller JM, Moliterno DJ, Moore JW, Oliver-McNeil SM, Popma JJ, Tommaso CL. 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac cath-eterization laboratory standards update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2221-2305.
15. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld J.W., Smith PK, Spertus JA ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:857-881.
16. Reiber JH, Kooijman CJ, Slager C.J., Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, Den Boer A, Wijns W, Serruys P.W., Hugenholtz PG Coronary artery dimensions from cineangiograms methodology and validation of a computer-assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1984;3:131-141.
17. Reiber JHC, Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Janssen J.P., Rareş A, Lansky AJ, Goedhart B. Chapter 2.2: Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. In: Oudkerk M, Reiser M.F., eds. Coronary Radiology. 2nd revised ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2009:41-65.
18. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman C.J., Wijns W., Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Hugenholtz PG Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation. 1985;71:280-288.
19. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Slager CJ Quantitative Coronary Angiography: Methodology and Clinical Applications. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1986.
20. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213-220.
21. Viera AJ, Garrett JM Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360-363.
22. Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM Putting ad hoc PCI on pause. JAMA. 2010;304:2059-2060.
23. Beauman GJ, Vogel RA Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:108-113.
24. Kussmaul III WG, Popp RL, Norcini J. Accuracy and reproducibility of visual coronary stenosis estimates using information from multiple observers. Clin Cardiol. 1992;15:154-162.
25. Lansky A, Tuinenburg J, Costa M., Maeng M, Koning G, Popma J., Cristea E, Gavit L, Costa R., Rares A, Va n Es GA, Lefevre T, Reiber H, Louvard Y, Morice MC; European Bifurcation Angiographic Sub-Committee. Quantitative an-giographic methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:258-266.
26. Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe M.T., Milford-Beland S, Fitzgerald S, Hermann A., Messenger J, Moussa I, Garratt K., Rumsfeld J, Brindis RG. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2017-2031.
27. Klaidman S. Coronary: A True Story of Medicine Gone Awry. New York, NY: Scribner; 2008.
28. Devi S. US physicians urge end to unnecessary stent operations. Lancet. 2011;378:651-652.
29. Parker, JP, Li, Z, Damberg, CL, Danielsen, B, Marcin, J, Dai, J, Steimle, AE. The California Report on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery 2000-2002 Hospital Data. San Francisco, CA: California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and the Pacific Business Group on Health; 2005.
30. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney P.A., Abraham L., Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick R.E., Barlow WE, Elmore JG Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1399-1409.
31. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan M.G., Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, Boggis C.R., Duffy SW; CADET II Group. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1675-1684.
32. Faxon DP, Vogel R, Yeh W., Holmes DR Jr, Detre K. Value of visual versus central quantitative measurements of angiographic success after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: NHLBI PTCA Registry Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1067-1072.