Putting ad hoc PCI on pause

JAMA

Volumn 304, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 2059-2060

  Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ^a   Krumholz, Harlan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HUMAN; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NOTE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 78149316878     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1509     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Myler RK, Stertzer SH, Clark DA, Shaw RE, Fishman-Rosen J, Murphy MC. Coronary angioplasty at the time of initial cardiac catheterization: "ad hoc" angioplasty possibilities and challenges. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1986;12(4):213-214.
2. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, et al. Predictors and outcomes of ad hoc versus non-ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(4):350-356.
3. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-1516.
4. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al; SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):961-972.
5. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Gold J, et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what happens in actual practice? Circulation. 2010;121(2):267-275.
6. Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS. Finding the courage to reconsider medical therapy for stable angina. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(7):751-753.
7. Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, et al. Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(5):307-313.
8. Blankenship JC, Klein LW, Laskey WK, et al. SCAI statement on ad hoc versus the separate performance of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63(4):444-451.
9. Krone RJ, Shaw RE, Klein LW, Blankenship JC, Weintraub WS; American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease - a study of prevalence, safety, and variation in use from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68(5):696-703.
10. Morgan MW, Deber RB, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(10):685-693.