A spatiotemporal comparison between olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials

NeuroImage

Volumn 77, Issue , 2013, Pages 254-261

  Iannilli, Emilia ^a   Wiens, Stefan ^b   Arshamian, Artin ^b   Seo, Han Seok ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DRESDEN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross modal interaction; Inverse solution; Microstate segmentation; Olfaction; Source localization; Trigeminal system

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; HYDROGEN SULFIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; ELECTRODE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE STIMULATION; NOCICEPTIVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OLFACTORY CORTEX; OLFACTORY NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; OLFACTORY NERVE; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876980988     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.057     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Albrecht J., Kopietz R., et al. The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function-an ALE meta-analysis of human functional brain imaging data. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 62(2):183-196.
2. Bensafi M., Iannilli E., Gerber J., Hummel T. Neural coding of stimulus concentration in the human olfactory and intranasal trigeminal systems. Neuroscience 2008, 154(2):832-838.
3. Bentley D.E., Derbyshire S.W., et al. Caudal cingulate cortex involvement in pain processing: an inter-individual laser evoked potential source localisation study using realistic head models. Pain 2003, 102(3):265-271.
4. Brandeis D., Ackermann P.J., et al. What to do in case of a severe trauma to the upper extremity. Soins 1999, (636):61-62.
5. Cain W.S., Murphy C.L. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature 1980, 284(5753):255-257.
6. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S., et al. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topogr. 2001, 14(2):131-137.
7. Doty R.L. Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans. Physiol. Behav. 1975, 14(6):855-859.
8. Doty R.L., Brugger W.E., et al. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol. Behav. 1978, 20(2):175-185.
9. Drewes A.M., Sami S.A., et al. Cerebral processing of painful oesophageal stimulation: a study based on independent component analysis of the EEG. Gut 2006, 55(5):619-629.
10. Elsberg C.A., Levy I., et al. The sense of smell VI. The trigeminal effects of odorous substances 1935.
11. Frasnelli J., Schuster B., et al. Olfactory dysfunction affects thresholds to trigeminal chemosensory sensations. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 468(3):259-263.
12. Gottfried J.A. Smell: central nervous processing. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006, 63:44-69.
13. Gottfried J.A. Central mechanisms of odour object perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11(9):628-641.
14. Hummel T., Kobal G. Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 84(1):84-89.
15. Hummel T., Kobal G. Olfactory event-related potentials. Methods and Frontiers in Chemosensory Research 2001, 429-464. S.A. Simon, M.A.L. Nicoleis (Eds.).
16. Hummel T., Barz S., et al. Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 108(2):208-217.
17. Hummel T., Doty R.L., et al. Functional MRI of intranasal chemosensory trigeminal activation. Chem. Senses 2005, 30(Suppl. 1):i205-i206.
18. Hummel T., Kobal G., et al. Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 264(3):237-243.
19. Hummel T., Iannilli E., et al. Central processing of trigeminal activation in humans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1170:190-195.
20. Iannilli E., Gerber J., et al. Intranasal trigeminal function in subjects with and without an intact sense of smell. Brain Res. 2007, 1139:235-244.
21. Iannilli E., Del Gratta C., et al. Trigeminal activation using chemical, electrical, and mechanical stimuli. Pain 2008, 139(2):376-388.
22. Iannilli E., Bitter T., et al. Differences in anosmic and normosmic group in bimodal odorant perception: a functional-MRI study. Rhinology 2011, 49(4):458-463.
23. Kobal G. Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen des menschlichen Geruchssinns 1981, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.
24. Kobal G., Hummel T. Olfactory and intranasal trigeminal event-related potentials in anosmic patients. Laryngoscope 1998, 108(7):1033-1035.
25. Kobal G., Hummel T., et al. "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 1996, 34:222-226.
26. Koukkou M., Lehmann D. An information-processing perspective of psychophysiological measurements. J. Psychophysiol. 1987, 1:109-112.
27. Lascano A.M., Hummel T., et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of olfactory processing in the human brain: an event-related source imaging study. Neuroscience 2010, 167(3):700-708.
28. Lehmann D. Brain electrical fields and brain functional states. Evolution of Dynamical Structures in Complex Systems 1992, 235-248. Springer, Berlin. R. Friedrich, A. Wunderlin (Eds.).
29. Lehmann D., Ozaki H., Pal I. EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 67:271-288.
30. Livermore A., Hummel T. The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Chem. Senses 2004, 29(1):41-51.
31. Michel C.M., Seeck M., et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of human cognition. News Physiol. Sci. 1999, 14:206-214.
32. Michel C.M., Murray M.M., et al. EEG source imaging. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115(10):2195-2222.
33. Michel C.M., Koenig T., et al. Electrical Neuroimaging 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Murray M.M., Michel C.M., et al. Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2004, 21(1):125-135.
35. Murray M.M., Brunet D., et al. Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topogr. 2008, 20(4):249-264.
36. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
37. Park H.J., Kwon J.S., et al. Statistical parametric mapping of LORETA using high density EEG and individual MRI: application to mismatch negativities in schizophrenia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 17(3):168-178.
38. Pause B.M., Sojka B., et al. The nature of the late positive complex within the olfactory event-related potential (OERP). Psychophysiology 1996, 33(4):376-384.
39. Pockett S., Whalen S., et al. Topography, independent component analysis and dipole source analysis of movement related potentials. Cogn. Neurodyn. 2007, 1(4):327-340.
40. Savic I., Gulyas B., et al. Odorant differentiated pattern of cerebral activation: comparison of acetone and vanillin. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 17(1):17-27.
41. Sobel N., Prabhakaran V., et al. Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory cortex. Nature 1998, 392(6673):282-286.
42. Sobel N., Prabhakaran V., et al. Odorant-induced and sniff-induced activation in the cerebellum of the human. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18(21):8990-9001.
43. Vogt B.A. Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6(7):533-544.