Hydrological Simulation in a Forest Dominated Watershed in Himalayan Region using SWAT Model

Water Resources Management

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 3005-3023

  Kushwaha, Akansha ^a   Jain, Manoj K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

Calibration; Hydrologic modelling; Runoff; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; FORESTRY; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAM FLOW;

CALIBRATION AND VALIDATIONS; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; HYDROLOGIC MODELLING; HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATIONS; LOCAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SENSITIVITY; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOLS;

WATERSHEDS;

BASEFLOW; CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION; FORESTRY; HYDROLOGY; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY; STREAM FLOW; WATER SHEDS;

HIMALAYAS; INDIA; KUMAUN HIMALAYAS; UTTARAKHAND;

EID: 84876952781     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-013-0329-9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 19(3): 563-572.
2. Arnold JG, Williams JR, Nicks AD, Sammons NB (1990) SWRRB: A basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management. A&M University Press, College Station, p 255.
3. Beven KJ (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology-the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol 105: 157-172.
4. Beven KJ (2001) Rainfall- Runoff modelling- the primer. Wiley, Chichester, 360.
5. Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San-Fransisco, p 588.
6. Chanasyk DS, Mapfumo E, Willms W (2003) Quantification and simulation of surface runoff from fescue grassland watersheds. Agr Water Manag 59(2): 137-153.
7. Cho SM, Lee MW (2001) Sensitivity considerations when modelling hydrologic processes with digital elevation model. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(4): 931-934.
8. Chu TW, Shirmohammadi A (2004) Evaluation of the SWAT model's hydrology component in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Trans ASAE 47(4): 1057-1073.
9. Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24(9): 1133-1148.
10. Du B, Ji X, Harmel RD, Hauck LM (2009) Evaluation of a watershed model for estimating daily flow using limited flow measurements. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(2): 475-484.
11. Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics: Part 1. The flow of air and water through soils. J Agr Sci 4: 11-24.
12. Haan CT (2002) Statistical methods in hydrology, 2nd edn. Ames, Iowa, p 496.
13. Hamby DM (1994) A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ Monit Assess 32: 135-154.
14. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2): 96-99.
15. Jain SK, Jaivir T, Vishal S (2010) Simulation of Runoff and Sediment Yield for a Himalayan Watershed Using SWAT Model. J Water Resource Protect 2: 267-281.
16. Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of"goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1): 233-241.
17. Leonard RA, Knisel WG, Still DA (1987) GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans ASAE 30(5): 1403-1418.
18. Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede HG (2002) Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Phys Chem Earth 27: 645-654.
19. Meiyan Y, Chen X, Li L et al (2011) Streamflow simulation by SWAT using different precipitation sources in large arid basins with scarce raingauges. Water Resour Manag 25: 2669-2681.
20. Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and the environment. In: The state and movement of water in living organisms, XIXth Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press. pp 205-234.
21. Motovilov YG, Gottschalk L, Engeland K, Rodhe A (1999) Validation of distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agric For Meteorol 98(1): 257-277.
22. Narasimhan B, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Di Luzio M (2005) Estimation of long-term soil moisture using a distributed parameter hydrologic model and verification using remotely sensed data. Trans ASAE 48(3): 1101-1113.
23. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3): 282-290.
24. National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, ICAR, Nagpur (2004) Soils of Uttar Pradesh for optimising land use: executive summary. Soils of Indian Series: Publication Number 68.
25. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR (2007) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2005. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Blackland Research Centre, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Temple.
26. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR (2010) Soil and water assessment tool input/output file documentation, version 2009. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Blackland Research Centre, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Temple.
27. Priestly CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100: 81-92.
28. Rossi CG, Srinivasan R, Jirayoot K, Le Due T et al (2009) Hydrologic evaluation of the lower Mekong River basin with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model. Int Agric Eng J 18(1-2): 1-13.
29. Schuol J, Abbaspour KC, Srinivasan R, Yang H (2008) Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model. J Hydrol 352(1-2): 30-49.
30. Sevat E, Dezetter A (1991) Selection of calibration objective functions in the context of rainfall-runoff modelling in a Sudanese savannah area. Hydrol Sci J 36: 307-330.
31. Spruill CA, Workman SR, Taraba JL (2000) Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. Trans ASAE 43(6): 1431-1439.
32. Srinivasan R, Arnold JG (1994) Integration of a basin-scale water quality model with GIS. Water Resour Bull Am Water Resour Assoc 30(3): 453-462.
33. Stehr A, Aguayo M, Link O, Parra O, Romero F, Alcayaga H (2010) Modelling the hydrologic response of a mesoscale Andean watershed to changes in land use patterns for environmental planning. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14: 1963-1977.
34. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1972) SCS National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
35. van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2005) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324(1-4): 10-23.
36. van Liew MW, Veith TL, Bosch DD, Arnold JG (2007) Suitability of SWAT for the Conservation Effects Assessment Project: comparison on USDA-ARS watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 12(2): 173-189.
37. White KL, Chaubey I (2005) Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable swat model. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(5): 1077-1089.
38. Williams JR, Nicks AD, Arnold JG (1985) Simulator for water resources in rural basins. J Hydrol Engr 111(6): 970-986.
39. Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modelling approach to determine the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans ASAE 27(1): 219-244.
40. Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Luzio MD, Arnold JG (2010) ArcsWAT interface for SWAT2009 User's Guide. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service Blackland Research Centre, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Temple.
41. Wu K, Johnston CA (2007) Hydrologic response to climatic variability in a Great Lakes Watershed: a case study with the SWAT model. J Hydrol 337: 187-199.