Comparative content analysis

The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 459-468

  Rössler, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876819825     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203149102-39     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Aday, S. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan War coverage on NBC and Fox News Channel. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 144-164.
2. AIM Research Consortium (Eds.) (2007). Comparing the logic of EU reporting in mass media across Europe:Transnational analysis of EU media coverage and of interviews in editorial offices in Europe. Bochum/Freiburg: ProjektVerlag.
3. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communications research. New York: The Free Press.
4. Esser, F. (1998). Editorial structures and work principles in British and German newsrooms. European Journal of Communication, 13(3), 375-405.
5. Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Jandura, G., Jandura, O., & Kuhlmann, C. (2005). Stichprobenziehung in der Inhaltsanalyse. Gegen den Mythos der künstlichen Woche [Sampling procedures for content analysis]. In V. Gehrau, B. Fretwurst, B. Krause, & G. Daschmann (Eds.), Auswahlverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [Sampling procedures in communications] (pp. 71-116). Cologne: von Halem.
8. Krippendorf, K. (1980, 2004a). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Krippendorf, K. (2004b). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.
10. Lauf, E. (2001). "96 nach Holsti�?: Zur reliabilität von Inhaltsanalysen und Deren darstellung in Kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften [How reliability in content analysis is reported in journal articles of the field]. Publizistik, 46(1), 57-68.
11. Lauf, E., & Peter, J. (2001). Die Codierung Verschiedensprachiger Inhalte: Erhebungskonzepte und Gütemaße [Coding of media content in different languages: Data collection and quality assessment]. In W. Wirth, & E. Lauf (Eds.), Inhaltsanalyse: Perspektiven, Probleme, Potentiale [Content analysis:Perspectives, potentials, problems] (pp. 199-217). Cologne: Herbert von Halem.
12. Lee, C., Chan, J. M., Pan, Z., & So, C. (2002). Global media spectacle. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
13. McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80-98.
14. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15. Peter, J. (2003). Why European TV news matters: A cross-nationally comparative analysis of TV news about the European Union and its effects. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
16. Peter, J., & Lauf, E. (2002). Reliability in cross-national content analysis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 815-832.
17. Raeymackers, K., & Golding, P. (2007). News agenda analysis of EU-related news: A comparative research programme for ten European countries (March 7-28, 2005). In AIM Research Consortium (Eds.), Comparing the logic of EU reporting in mass media across Europe: Transnational analysis of EU media coverage and the interviews in editorial offices in Europe (pp. 9-22). Bochum/Freiburg: ProjektVerlag.
18. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998, 2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Rössler, P. (2004). Political communication messages: Pictures of our world on television news. In F. Esser, & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 271-292). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Rössler, P. (2008a). Gütekriterien bei International Vergleichenden Inhaltsanalysen [Quality indicators for cross-nationally comparative content analysis]. In G. Melischek, J. Seethaler, & J. Wilke (Eds.), Medien & kommunikationsforschung im vergleich [Comparative approaches to media and communication research] (pp. 419-434). Wiesbaden: VS.
21. Rössler, P. (2008b). Media Use, International. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (pp. 3012-1019). Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Rössler, P. (2010). Inhaltsanalyse [Content analysis] (2nd edition). Konstanz: UVK.
23. Schulz, W. (2008). Kommunikationsforscher als Komparatisten [Communication scholars working comparatively]. In G. Melischek, J. Seethaler, & J. Wilke (Eds.), Medien & Kommunikationsforschung im Vergleich [Comparative approaches to media and comunication research] (pp. 17-25). Wiesbaden: VS.
24. Soroka, S. N. (2002). Agenda-setting dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
25. Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd edition; pp. 17-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. van der Wurff, R., & Lauf, E. (2005). Print and online newspapers in Europe: A comparative analysis in 16 countries. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
27. Welker, M., & Wünsch, C. (Eds.) (2010). Die Online-Inhaltsanalyse: Forschungsobjekt Internet [Online media content analysis: The Internet as research subject]. Cologne: von Halem.
28. Wessler, H., & Adolphsen, M. (2008). Contra-flow from the Arab world? How Arab television coverage of the 2003 Iraq war was used and framed on Western international news channels. Media, Culture & Society, 30(4), 439-461.
29. Wirth, W., & Kolb, S. (2004). Designs and methods of comparative political communication research. In F. Esser, & B. Pfetsch, (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 87-114). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.