Context-Sensitive Syntactic Source-Reordering by Statistical Transduction

IJCNLP 2011 - Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 38-46

  Khalilov, Maxim ^a   Sima'An, Khalil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; LANGUAGE PAIRS; PARSE TREES; PERFORMANCE; PHRASE TRANSLATIONS; TARGET WORDS; TRANSLATION MODELS; TREE-BASED; WORD ALIGNMENT; WORD ORDERS;

BACTERIOPHAGES;

EID: 84876808798     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. A. Berger, S. Della Pietra, and V. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 1(22):39-72.
2. D. Chiang. 2005. A hierarchical phrase-based model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL'05, pages 263-270, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
3. D. Chiang. 2007. Hierarchical phrase-based translation. Computational Linguistics, 2(33):201-228.
4. M. Collins, P. Koehn, and I. Kučerová. 2005. Clause restructuring for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL'05, pages 531-540, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
5. M. R. Costa-jussà and J. A. R. Fonollosa. 2006. Statistical machine reordering. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP'06, pages 70-76, New York, NY, USA.
6. G. Doddington. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-grams co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of HLT'02, pages 128-132, San Diego, CA, USA.
7. L. Huang, H. Zhang, D. Gildea, and K. Knight. 2009. Binarization of synchronous context-free grammars. Computational Linguistics, 35(4):559-595.
8. M. Khalilov and K. Sima'an. 2010. A discriminative syntactic model for source permutation via tree transduction. In Proceedings of SSST-4 workshop at COLING'10, pages 92-100, Beijing, China.
9. D. Klein and C. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of ACL'03, pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
10. Ph. Koehn, F. Och, and D. Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based machine translation. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL'03, pages 48-54, Edmonton, Canada.
11. Ph. Koehn, H. Hoang, A. Birch, C. Callison-Burch, M. Federico, N. Bertoldi, B. Cowan, W. Shen, C. Moran, R. Zens, C. Dyer, O. Bojar, A. Constantin, and E. Herbst. 2007. Moses: open-source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL'07, pages 177-180, Prague, Czech Republic.
12. Ph. Koehn. 2004. Statistical significance tests for machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of EMNLP'04, pages 388-395, Barcelona, Spain.
13. C. Li, L. Minghui, D. Zhang, M. Li, M. Zhou, and Y. Guan. 2007. A probabilistic approach to syntax-based reordering for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL'07, pages 720-727, Prague, Czech Republic.
14. F. Och and H. Ney. 2004. The alignment template approach to statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):417-449.
15. F. Och. 1999. An efficient method for determining bilingual word classes. In Proceedings of ACL'99, pages 71-76, Maryland, MD, USA.
16. F. Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL'03, pages 160-167, Sapporo, Japan.
17. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W. Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL'02, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
18. M. Popovic' and H. Ney. 2006. POS-based word reorderings for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of LREC'06, pages 1278-1283, Genoa, Italy, May.
19. A. Ramanathan, P. Bhattacharyya, J. Hegde, R.M. Shah, and M. Sasikumar. 2008. Simple syntactic and morphological processing can help english-hindi statistical machine translation. In In Proceedings of IJCNLP'08, Hyderabad, India.
20. A. Stolcke. 2002. SRILM: an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proceedings of SLP'02, pages 901-904.
21. C. Tillman. 2004. A unigram orientation model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL'04, pages 101-104, Boston, MA, USA.
22. R. Tromble and J. Eisner. 2009. Learning linear ordering problems for better translation. In Proceedings of EMNLP'09, pages 1007-1016, Singapore.
23. K. Visweswariah, J. Navratil, J. Sorensen, V. Chenthamarakshan, and N. Kambhatla. 2010. Syntax based reordering with automatically derived rules for improved statistical machine translation. In Proceeding of COLING'10, pages 1119-1127, Beijing, China.
24. C. Wang, M. Collins, and Ph. Koehn. 2007. Chinese syntactic reordering for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL'07, pages 737-745, Prague, Czech Republic.
25. W. Wang, J. May, K. Knight, and D. Marcu. June 2010. Re-structuring, re-labeling, and re-aligning for syntax-based machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 36:247-277.
26. D. Wu and H. Wong. 1998. Machine translation wih a stochastic grammatical channel. In Proceedings of ACL-COLING'98, pages 1408-1415, Columbus, OH, USA.
27. F. Xia and M. McCord. 2004. Improving a statistical MT system with automatically learned rewrite patterns. In Proceedings of COLING'04, pages 508-514, Geneva, Switzerland.
28. R. Zens, F. Och, and H. Ney. 2002. Phrase-based statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of KI: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pages 18-32.
29. S. Zwarts and M. Dras. 2007. Syntax-based word reordering in phrase-based statistical machine translation: Why does it work? In Proceedings of the MT Summit XI, Copenhagen, Denmark.