Patient burden of colonoscopy after positive fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 342-349

  Denters, M J ^a   Deutekom, M ^b   Bossuyt, P M ^b   Fockens, P ^a   Dekker, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SLEEP;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMMUNICATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 84876797886     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326238     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Segnan N., Senore C., Andreoni B. et al. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology: 2007; 132 2304 2312 (Pubitemid 46900821)
2. Hol L., van Leerdam M. E., van Ballegooijen M. et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut: 2010; 59 62 68
3. Bleiker E. M., Menko F. H., Taal B. G. et al. Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology: 2005; 128 280 287 (Pubitemid 40431081)
4. Harewood G. C., Wiersema M. J., Melton L. J III. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2002; 97 3186 3194 (Pubitemid 35428814)
5. Denters M. J., Deutekom M., Fockens P. et al. Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands. BMC Gastroenterol: 2009; 9 28
6. Nagengast F., Kaandorp C. Revised CBO guideline: Follow-up after polypectomy [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd: 2001; 145 2022 2025 (Pubitemid 32979472)
7. Essink-Bot M. L., de Koning H. J., Nijs H. G. et al. Short-term effects of population-based screening for prostate cancer on health-related quality of life. J Natl Cancer Inst: 1998; 90 925 931 (Pubitemid 28304162)
8. Essink-Bot M. L., Rijnsburger A. J., van Dooren S. et al. Women's acceptance of MRI in breast cancer surveillance because of a familial or genetic predisposition. Breast: 2006; 15 673 676 (Pubitemid 44509774)
9. Essink-Bot M. L., Kruijshaar M. E., Bac D. J. et al. Different perceptions of the burden of upper GI endoscopy: an empirical study in three patient groups. Qual Life Res: 2007; 16 1309 1318 (Pubitemid 47459879)
10. Kruijshaar M. E., Kerkhof M., Siersema P. D. et al. The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy: 2006; 38 873 878 (Pubitemid 44430683)
11. Liedenbaum M. H., Denters M. J., de Vries A. H. et al. Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: influence on image quality and patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2010; 195 W31 W37
12. Liedenbaum M. H., Denters M. J., Zijta F. M. et al. Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance. Clin Radiol: 2011; 66 30 37
13. Denters M. J., Deutekom M., Bossuyt P. M. et al. Patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy procedure: endoscopists overestimate the importance of adverse physical symptoms. Frontline Gastroenterology: 2012; 3 130 136
14. Sint N. J., de Jonge V., Korfage I. J. et al. Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 462 72
15. Belsey J., Epstein O., Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2007; 25 373 384 (Pubitemid 46184450)
16. Khan M. A., Piotrowski Z., Brown M. D. Patient acceptance, convenience, and efficacy of single-dose versus split-dose colonoscopy bowel preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol: 2010; 44 310 311
17. Rex D. K., Johnson D. A., Anderson J. C. et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol: 2009; 104 739 750
18. Bretthauer M., Hoff G., Thiis-Evensen E. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2002; 37 1103 1107
19. Bretthauer M., Lynge A. B., Thiis-Evensen E. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: safe and effective in sedated patients. Endoscopy: 2005; 37 706 709 (Pubitemid 41078901)
20. Stevenson G. W., Wilson J. A., Wilkinson J. et al. Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc: 1992; 38 564 567
21. Sumanac K., Zealley I., Fox B. M. et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc: 2002; 56 190 194
22. Yamano H. O., Yoshikawa K., Kimura T. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gas volume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partial CO2 pressure. J Gastroenterol: 2010; 45 1235 1240
23. Janz N. K., Wren P. A., Schottenfeld D. et al. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med: 2003; 37 06 627 634 (Pubitemid 37443502)
24. Rawl S. M., Menon U., Champion V. L. et al. Do benefits and barriers differ by stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening? Health Educ Res: 2005; 20 137 148 (Pubitemid 40461471)
25. Wardle J., Williamson S., McCaffery K. et al. Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults. Health Psychol: 2003; 22 99 105 (Pubitemid 36133908)
26. Mitchell K. A., Rawl S. M., Champion V. L. et al. Development and psychometric testing of the colonoscopy embarrassment scale. West J Nurs Res: 2012; 34 548 564
27. van Rijn A. F., van Rossum L. G., Deutekom M. et al. Low priority main reason not to participate in a colorectal cancer screening program with a faecal occult blood test. J Public Health (Oxf): 2008; 30 461 465
28. Yacavone R. F., Locke G. R III, Gostout C. J. et al. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2001; 53 703 710 (Pubitemid 33717241)
29. Davies A. R., Ware J. E Jr. GHAA's consumer satisfaction survey and user's manual. Washington, DC Group Health Association of America: 1991
30. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2000; 52 827 830
31. de Wijkerslooth T. R., de Haan M. C., Stoop E. M. et al. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial. Gut: 2012; 61 1552 1559