Prague dependency treebank 2.5 - A revisited version of PDT 2.0

24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 231-246

  Bejček, Eduard ^a   Panevová, Jarmila ^a   Popelka, Jan ^a   Straňák, Pavel ^a   Ševčíková, Magda ^a   Štěpánek, Jan ^a   Žabokrtský, Zdeněk ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Annotation; Clauses; Linguistic theory; Multiword expressions; Pair group meaning; PDT; Semantics; Syntax; Treebank

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION; CLAUSES; LINGUISTIC THEORY; MULTI-WORD EXPRESSIONS; PAIR/GROUP MEANING; PDT; SYNTAX; TREEBANKS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84876797393     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Baldwin, T., Bannard, C., Tanaka, T., and Widdows, D. (2003). An empirical model of multiword expression decomposability. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Multiword expressions, pages 89-96, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
3. Filipec, J. (1994). Lexicology and lexicography: Development and state of the research. In Luelsdorff, P. A., editor, The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics, pages 163-183, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. J. Benjamins.
4. Hajič, J., Panevová, J., Hajičová, E., Sgall, P., Pajas, P., Štěpánek, J., Havelka, J., Mikulová, M., Žabokrtský, Z., and Ševčíková Razímová, M. (2006). Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. CD-ROM. Linguistic Data Consortium.
5. Ide, N. and Suderman, K. (2009). Bridging the gaps: Interoperability for GrAF, GATE, and UIMA. In Proceedings of the Third Linguistic Annotation Workshop, ACL-IJCNLP '09, pages 27-34, Suntec, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Lopatková, M., Homola, P., and Klyueva, N. (2012). Annotation of sentence structure: Capturing the relationship between clauses in Czech sentences. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46(1):25-36.
7. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
8. Mel'čuk, I. A. and Polguère, A. (1987). A formal lexicon in The Meaning-Text Theory (or how to do lexica with words). Computational Linguistics, 13(3-4):261-275.
9. Meyers, A., Reeves, R., Macleod, C., Szekely, R., Zielinska, V., Young, B., and Grishman, R. (2004). The NomBank Project: An Interim Report. In Meyers, A., editor, HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, pages 24-31, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Mikulová, M., Bémová, A., Hajič, J., Hajičová, E., Havelka, J., Kolářová, V., Kučová, L., Lopatková, M., Pajas, P., Panevová, J., Razímová, M., Sgall, P., Štěpánek, J., Urešová, Z., Veselá, K., and Žabokrtský, Z. (2006). Annotation on the tectogrammatical level in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Annotation manual. Technical Report 30, ÚFAL MFF UK, Prague, Czech Rep.
11. Osenova, P. and Kolkovska, S. (2002). Combining the named-entity recognition task and NP chunking strategy for robust pre-processing. In Proceedings of The First Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT2002).
12. Pajas, P. and Štěpánek, J. (2006). XML-based representation of multi-layered annotation in the PDT 2.0. In Hinrichs, R. E., Ide, N., Palmer, M., and Pustejovsky, J., editors, Proceedings of the LREC Workshop on Merging and Layering Linguistic Information (LREC 2006), pages 40-47, Genova, Italy.
13. Pajas, P. and Štepánek, J. (2008). Recent Advances in a Feature-Rich Framework for Treebank Annotation. In Scott, D. and Uszkoreit, H., editors, The 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of the Conference, volume 2, pages 673-680, Manchester, UK. The Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.
14. Pajas, P. and Štepánek, J. (2009). System for querying syntactically annotated corpora. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Software Demonstrations, pages 33-36, Suntec, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., and Kingsbury, P. (2005). The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71-105.
16. Panevová, J. and Ševčíková, M. (2011). Jak se počítají substantiva v češtině : poznámky ke kategorii čísla. Slovo a slovesnost, 72:163-176.
17. Pecina, P. (2009). Lexical Association Measures: Collocation Extraction, volume 4 of Studies in Computational and Theoretical Linguistics. Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic.
18. Popel, M. and Žabokrtský, Z. (2010). Tecto MT: Modular NLP framework. In Loftsson, H., Rögnvaldsson, E., and Helgadottir, S., editors, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Natural Language Processing (IceTAL 2010), volume 6233 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 293-304, Berlin/Heidelberg. Iceland Centre for Language Technology (ICLT), Springer.
19. Sag, I. A., Baldwin, T., Bond, F., Copestake, A., and Flickinger, D. (2002). Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for nlp. In Third International Conference, CICLing.
20. Sgall, P. (1967). Generativní popis jazyka a česká deklinace. Academia, Praha.
21. Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., and Panevová, J. (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Academia/Reidel Publ. Comp., Praha/Dordrecht.
22. ÚČNK - Institute of the Czech National Corpus (2005). Czech National Corpus - SYN2005. http://www.korpus.cz.Prague.
23. Weischedel, R. and Brunstein, A. (2005). BBN Pronoun Coreference and Entity Type Corpus. CD-ROM. Linguistic Data Consortium.
24. Xue, N., Jiang, Z., Zhong, X., Palmer, M., Xia, F., Chiou, F.-D., and Chang, M. (2010). Chinese treebank 7.0. CD-ROM. Linguistic Data Consortium.