Crystal structure of a eukaryotic phosphate transporter

Nature

Volumn 496, Issue 7446, 2013, Pages 533-536

  Pedersen, Bjørn P ^a   Kumar, Hemant ^a,b   Waight, Andrew B ^a   Risenmay, Aaron J ^a   Roe Zurz, Zygy ^a   Chau, Bryant H ^a   Schlessinger, Avner ^c   Bonomi, Massimiliano ^c   Harries, William ^a   Sali, Andrej ^c   Johri, Atul K ^b   Stroud, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c San Francisco   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ORGANIC CATION TRANSPORTER 1; ORGANIC CATION TRANSPORTER 3; PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER;

CATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTE; FUNGUS; LIPID; METABOLISM; NUMERICAL MODEL; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; PHOSPHATE; SOLUTE; SUBSTRATE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CATION TRANSPORT; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; LIPOGENESIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHOSPHATE TRANSPORT; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON MOTIVE FORCE; PROTON TRANSPORT; SYNAPSE VESICLE;

BASIDIOMYCOTA; BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHOSPHATE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; PHOSPHATES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTONS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EUKARYOTA; FUNGI; PIRIFORMOSPORA INDICA;

EID: 84876797248     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12042     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Pao, S. S., Paulsen, I. T.&Saier, M. H. Jr. Major facilitator superfamily. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 1-34 (1998).
2. Persson, B. L. et al. Regulation of phosphate acquisition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 43, 225-244 (2003).
3. Nussaume, L. et al. Phosphate import in plants: Focus on the PHT1 transporters. Front. Plant Sci. 2, 83 (2011).
4. Giots, F., Donaton, M. C. V. & Thevelein, J. M. Inorganic phosphate is sensed by specific phosphate carriers and acts in concert with glucose as a nutrient signal for activation of the protein kinase A pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 1163-1181 (2003).
5. Popova, Y., Thayumanavan, P., Lonati, E., Agrochao, M. & Thevelein, J. Transport and signaling through the phosphate-binding site of the yeast Pho84 phosphate transceptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2890-2895 (2010).
6. Giacomini, K. M. et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 215-236 (2010).
7. Hediger, M. A. et al. The ABCs of solute carriers: physiological, pathological and therapeutic implications of human membrane transport proteins. Pflugers Arch. 447, 465-468 (2004).
8. Hirai, T. et al. Three-dimensional structure of a bacterial oxalate transporter. Nature Struct. Biol. 9, 597-600 (2002).
9. Abramson, J. et al. Structure and mechanism of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. Science 301, 610-615 (2003).
10. Huang, Y., Lemieux, M. J., Song, J., Auer, M.&Wang, D. N. Structureandmechanism of the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter from Escherichia coli. Science 301, 616-620 (2003).
11. Yin, Y., He, X., Szewczyk, P., Nguyen, T. & Chang, G. Structure of the multidrug transporter EmrD from Escherichia coli. Science 312, 741-744 (2006).
12. Dang, S. et al. Structure of a fucose transporter in an outward-open conformation. Nature 467, 734-738 (2010).
13. Newstead, S. et al. Crystal structure of a prokaryotic homologue of themammalian oligopeptide-proton symporters, PepT1and PepT2.EMBOJ.30, 417-426 (2011).
14. Solcan, N. et al. Alternating access mechanism in the POT family of oligopeptide transporters. EMBO J. 31, 3411-3421 (2012).
15. Sun, L. et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4. Nature 490, 361-366 (2012).
16. Holyoake, J. & Sansom, M. S. P. Conformational change in an MFS protein: MD simulations of LacY. Structure 15, 873-884 (2007).
17. Smirnova, I. et al. Sugar binding induces an outward facing conformation of LacY. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16504-16509 (2007).
18. Madej, M. G., Soro, S. N. & Kaback, H. R. Apo-intermediate in the transport cycle of lactose permease (LacY). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2970-2978 (2012).
19. Varma, A., Bakshi, M., Lou, B., Hartmann, A. & Oelmueller, R. Piriformospora indica: A novel plant growth-promoting mycorrhizal fungus. Agric. Res. 1, 117-131 (2012).
20. Yadav, V. et al. A phosphate transporter from the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica plays a role in phosphate transport to the host plant. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 26532-26544 (2010).
21. Fredriksson, R., Nordstro, K. J. V., Stephansson, O., Haglund, M. G. A. & Schioh, H. B. The solute carrier (SLC) complement of the human genome: phylogenetic classification reveals four major families. FEBS Lett. 582, 3811-3816 (2008).
22. Schlessinger, A. et al. Comparison of human solute carriers. Protein Sci. 19, 412-428 (2010).
23. Forrest, L. R., Kraer, R. & Ziegler, C. The structural basis of secondary active transport mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 167-188 (2011).
24. Samyn, D. R. et al. Mutational analysis of putative phosphate-and proton-binding sites intheSaccharomyces cerevisiaePho84phosphate: H1transceptorandits effect on signalling to the PKA and PHO pathways. Biochem. J. 445, 413-422 (2012).
25. Kaback, H. R., Smirnova, I., Kasho, V., Nie, Y. & Zhou, Y. The alternating access transport mechanism in LacY. J. Membr. Biol. 239, 85-93 (2011).
26. Krupka, R. M. Coupling mechanisms in active transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1183, 105-113 (1993).
27. Luecke, H. & Quiocho, F. A. High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds. Nature 347, 402-406 (1990).
28. Vyas, N. K., Vyas, M. N. & Quiocho, F. A. Crystal structure of M tuberculosis ABC phosphate transport receptor: specificity and charge compensation dominated by ion-dipole interactions. Structure 11, 765-774 (2003).
29. Morales, R. et al. Serendipitous discovery and X-ray structure of a human phosphate binding apolipoprotein. Structure 14, 601-609 (2006).
30. Feng, B., Dresser, M. J., Shu, Y., Johns, S. J. & Giacomini, K. M. Arginine 454 and lysine 370 are essential for the anion specificity of the organic anion transporter, rOAT3. Biochemistry 40, 5511-5520 (2001).
31. Mumberg, D., Muller, R. & Funk, M. Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5767-5768 (1994).
32. Li, M. et al.Selecting optimumeukaryotic integralmembraneproteins for structure determination by rapid expression and solubilization screening. J. Mol. Biol. 385, 820-830 (2009).
33. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125-132 (2010).
34. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235-242 (2011).
35. Pedersen, B. P., Morth, J. P. & Nissen, P. Structure determination using poorly diffracting membrane protein crystals-Lessons from the H1 and Na1,K1-ATPases. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 309-313 (2010).
36. Sheldrick, G. M. Experimental phasing withSHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 479-485 (2010).
37. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. C., Valegard, K., Hajdu, J.&Andersson, I.MIRphasing using merohedrally twinned crystals. Acta Crystallogr. D 59, 2017-2022 (2003).
38. Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M. & Paciorek, W. Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. D 59, 2023-2030 (2003).
39. Cowtan, K.: An automated procedure for phase improvement by density modification. CCP4 Newsl. Protein Crystallogr. 31, 34-38 (1994).
40. Keller, S., Pojer, F., Heide, L. & Lawson, D. M. Molecular replacement in the 'twilight zone': structure determination of the non-haem iron oxygenase NovR from Streptomyces spheroides through repeated density modification of a poor molecular-replacement solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 1564-1570 (2006).
41. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan,S. W.&Kjeldgaard, M.Improved methods for building proteinmodels in electron densitymaps and the location of errors in thesemodels. Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 110-119 (1991).
42. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010).
43. McCoy, A. J. Liking likelihood. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2169-2183 (2004).
44. Karplus, P. A. & Diederichs, K. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030-1033 (2012).
45. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12-21 (2010).
46. Petrek, M., Kosinova P., Koca, J. & Otyepka, M. MOLE: A Voronoi diagram-based explorer of molecular channels, pores, and tunnels. Structure 15, 1357-1363 (2007).
47. Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J. & McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041 (2001).
48. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5.0.4 (Schroinger LLC, 2012).
49. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792-1797 (2004).
50. Pei, J., Kim, B.-H.&Grishin, N. V.PROMALS3D: a tool formultiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2295-2300 (2008).
51. Kal, L., Krogh, A. & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 1027-1036 (2004).
52. Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 (1993).
53. Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 15, 2507-2524 (2006).
54. Krivov, G. G., Shapovalov, M. V. & Dunbrack, R. L. Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 77, 778-795 (2009).
55. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalablemolecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435-447 (2008).
56. Bjelkmar, P., Larsson, P., Cuendet, M. A., Hess, B. & Lindahl, E. Implementation of the CHARMM Force Field in GROMACS: Analysis of protein stability effects from correction maps, virtual interaction sites, and water models. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6, 459-466 (2010).
57. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926-935 (1983).
58. Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671-690 (2010).
59. Lomize, M. A., Pogozheva, I. D., Joo, H.,Mosberg, H. I.& Lomize, A. L. OPMdatabase andPPMweb server: resources for positioning of proteins inmembranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D370-D376 (2012).
60. Jo, S., Lim, J. B., Klauda, J. B. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI membrane builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes. Biophys. J. 97, 50-58 (2009).
61. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Vangunsteren, W. F., Dinola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular-dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684-3690 (1984).
62. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
63. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single-crystals-a new molecular-dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182-7190 (1981).