Neurogenesis is required for behavioral recovery after injury in the visual system of Xenopus laevis

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 521, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2262-2278

  McKeown, Caroline R ^a   Sharma, Pranav ^a   Sharipov, Heidi E ^b   Shen, Wanhua ^a,c   Cline, Hollis T ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HANGZHOU NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brain damage; Cell proliferation; Injury response; Musashi; N tubulin; Neural progenitor cell; Optic tectum; PH3; Retinotectal system; Stem cell; Visual avoidance behavior

Indexed keywords

BETA TUBULIN ANTIBODY; MUSASHI1 ANTIBODY; PHOSPHOHISTONE H3 ANTIBODY; PROTEIN ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIBODY LABELING; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LABELING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; SWIMMING; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; VISUAL SYSTEM; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; DEOXYURIDINE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ESCAPE REACTION; FEMALE; HISTONES; HYDROXYUREA; MALE; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NEUROGENESIS; NEURONS; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; SUPERIOR COLLICULI; TUBULIN; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 84876726131     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: 10969861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23283     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Banerjee A, Roach MC, Wall KA, Lopata MA, Cleveland DW, Luduena RF. 1988. A monoclonal antibody against the type II isotype of beta-tubulin. Preparation of isotypically altered tubulin. J Biol Chem 263: 3029-3034.
2. Bestman JE, Lee-Osbourne J, Cline HT. 2012. In vivo time-lapse imaging of cell proliferation and differentiation in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. J Comp Neurol 520: 401-433.
3. Blaiss CA, Yu TS, Zhang G, Chen J, Dimchev G, Parada LF, Powell CM, Kernie SG. 2011. Temporally specified genetic ablation of neurogenesis impairs cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 31: 4906-4916.
4. Cernak I. 2005. Animal models of head trauma. NeuroRx 2: 410-422.
5. Chen J, Magavi SS, Macklis JD. 2004. Neurogenesis of corticospinal motor neurons extending spinal projections in adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 16357-16362.
6. Chernoff EA, Stocum DL, Nye HL, Cameron JA. 2003. Urodele spinal cord regeneration and related processes. Dev Dyn 226: 295-307.
7. Chiu SL, Chen CM, Cline HT. 2008. Insulin receptor signaling regulates synapse number, dendritic plasticity, and circuit function in vivo. Neuron 58: 708-719.
8. Covey MV, Jiang Y, Alli VV, Yang Z, Levison SW. 2010. Defining the critical period for neocortical neurogenesis after pediatric brain injury. Dev Neurosci 32: 488-498.
9. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, Littman DR, Dustin ML, Gan WB. 2005. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci 8: 752-758.
10. Dong W, Lee RH, Xu H, Yang S, Pratt KG, Cao V, Song YK, Nurmikko A, Aizenman CD. 2009. Visual avoidance in Xenopus tadpoles is correlated with the maturation of visual responses in the optic tectum. J Neurophysiol 101: 803-815.
11. Endo T, Yoshino J, Kado K, Tochinai S. 2007. Brain regeneration in anuran amphibians. Dev Growth Differ 49: 121-129.
12. Ferretti P. 2011. Is there a relationship between adult neurogenesis and neuron generation following injury across evolution? Eur J Neurosci 34: 951-962.
13. Filoni S, Gibertini G. 1969. A study of the regenerative capacity of the central nervous system of anuran amphibia in relation to their stage of development. I. Observations on the regeneration of the optic lobe of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) in the larval stages. Arch Biol (Liege) 80: 369-411.
14. Filoni S, Margotta V. 1971. A study of the regeneration of the cerebellum of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) in the larval stages and after metamorphosis. Arch Biol (Liege) 82: 433-470.
15. Filoni S, Bernardini S, Cannata S. 1995. Differences in the decrease in regenerative capacity of various brain regions of Xenopus laevis are related to the differences in the undifferentiated cell populations. J Brain Res 36: 523-529.
16. Gaete M, Munoz R, Sanchez N, Tampe R, Moreno M, Contreras EG, Lee-Liu D, Larrain J. 2012. Spinal cord regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles proceeds through activation of Sox2-positive cells. Neural Dev 7: 13.
17. Gaze RM, Keating MJ, Ostberg A, Chung S-H. 1979. The relationship between retinal and tectal growth in larval Xenopus: implications for the development of the retino-tectal projection. J Embryol Exp Morph 53: 103-143.
18. Gibbs K, Chittur S, Szaro B. 2011. Metamorphosis and the regenerative capacity of spinal cord axons in Xenopus laevis. Eur J Neurosci 33: 9-25.
19. Gong Q, Shipley MT. 1995. Evidence that pioneer olfactory axons regulate telencephalon cell cycle kinetics to induce the formation of the olfactory bulb. Neuron 14: 91-101.
20. Good PJ, Richter K, Dawid IB. 1989. The sequence of a nervous system-specific, class II beta-tubulin gene from Xenopus laevis. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 8000.
21. Goodbrand IA, Gaze RM. 1991. Microglia in tadpoles of Xenopus laevis: normal distribution and the response to optic nerve injury. Anat Embryol (Berl) 184: 71-82.
22. Gotz M, Huttner WB. 2005. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 777-788.
23. Haas K, Jensen K, Sin WC, Foa L, Cline HT. 2002. Targeted electroporation in Xenopus tadpoles in vivo - from single cells to the entire brain. Differentiation 70: 148-154.
24. Harris W, Hartenstein V. 1991. Neuronal determination without cell division in Xenopus embryos. Neuron 6: 499-515.
25. Harry GJ, Kraft AD. 2012. Microglia in the developing brain: A potential target with lifetime effects. Neurotoxicology 33: 191-206.
26. Hsu E, Pasquier L. 1984. Ontogeny of the immune system in Xenopus. Differentiation 28: 109-115.
27. Huang JK, Dorey K, Ishibashi S, Amaya E. 2007. BDNF promotes target innervation of Xenopus mandibular trigeminal axons in vivo. BMC Dev Biol 7: 59.
28. Jacob SW, de la Torre JC. 2009. Pharmacology of dimethyl sulfoxide in cardiac and CNS damage. Pharmacol Rep 61: 225-235.
29. Jordan M. 1958. Regeneration of the endbrain in postmetamorphic Xenopus laevis. Folia Biol (Krakow) 6: 103-115.
30. Julien C, Marcouiller F, Bretteville A, El Khoury NB, Baillargeon J, Hébert SS, Planel E. 2012. Dimethyl sulfoxide induces both direct and indirect tau hyperphosphorylation. PLoS ONE 7: e40020.
31. Kaneko Y, Sakakibaraa S, Imaia T, Suzukia A, Nakamuraa Y, Sawamotoa K, Ogawaa Y, Toyamad Y, Miyataa T, Okanoa H. 2000. Musashi1: an evolutionally conserved marker for CNS progenitor cells including neural stem cells. Dev Neurosci 22: 139-153.
32. Kazim SF, Shamim MS, Tahir MZ, Enam SA, Waheed S. 2011. Management of penetrating brain injury. J Emerg Trauma Shock 4: 395-402.
33. Kernie SG, Parent JM. 2010. Forebrain neurogenesis after focal Ischemic and traumatic brain injury. Neurobiol Dis 37: 267-274.
34. Kim Y, Szele FG. 2008. Activation of subventricular zone stem cells after neuronal injury. Cell Tissue Res 331: 337-345.
35. Kim WR, Chun SK, Kim TW, Kim H, Ono K, Takebayashi H, Ikenaka K, Oppenheim RW, Sun W. 2011. Evidence for the spontaneous production but massive programmed cell death of new neurons in the subcallosal zone of the postnatal mouse brain. Eur J Neurosci 33: 599-611.
36. Kishimoto N, Shimizu K, Sawamoto K. 2012. Neuronal regeneration in a zebrafish model of adult brain injury. Dis Model Mech 5: 200-209.
37. Kleindienst A, McGinn MJ, Harvey HB, Colello RJ, Hamm RJ, Bullock MR. 2005. Enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis by intraventricular S100B infusion is associated with improved cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 22: 645-655.
38. Kroehne V, Freudenreich D, Hans S, Kaslin J, Brand M. 2011. Regeneration of the adult zebrafish brain from neurogenic radial glia-type progenitors. Development 138: 4831-4841.
39. Liu H, Guthrie KM. 2011. Neuronal replacement in the injured olfactory bulb. Exp Neurol 228: 270-282.
40. Lu P, Wang Y, Graham L, McHale K, Gao M, Wu D, Brock J, Blesch A, Rosenzweig ES, Havton LA, Zheng B, Conner JM, Marsala M, Tuszynski MH. 2012. Long-distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury. Cell 150: 1264-1273.
41. Mackerle Z, Gal P. 2009. Unusual penetrating head injury in children: personal experience and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 25: 909-913.
42. Magavi SS, Leavitt BR, Macklis JD. 2000. Induction of neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult mice. Nature 405: 951-955.
43. Minelli G, Franceschini V, Del Grande P, Ciani F. 1987. Newly-formed neurons in the regenerating optic tectum of Triturus cristatus carnifex. Basic Appl Histochem 31: 43-52.
44. Minelli G, del Grande P, Franceschini V, Ciani F. 1990. Proliferative response of the mesencephalic matrix areas in the reparation of the optic tectum of Triturus cristatus carnifex. Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch 104: 17-25.
45. Moody SA, Miller V, Spanos A, Frankfurter A. 1996. Developmental expression of a neuron-specific beta-tubulin in frog (Xenopus laevis): a marker for growing axons during the embryonic period. J Comp Neurol 364: 219-230.
46. Morganti-Kossmann MC, Rancan M, Otto VI, Stahel PF, Kossmann T. 2001. Role of cerebral inflammation after traumatic brain injury: a revisited concept. Shock 16: 165-177.
47. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.
48. Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F. 2005. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 308: 1314-1318.
49. Packer MA, Stasiv Y, Benraiss A, Chmielnicki E, Grinberg A, Westphal H, Goldman SA, Enikolopov G. 2003. Nitric oxide negatively regulates mammalian adult neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9566-9571.
50. Peunova N, Scheinker V, Ravi K, Enikolopov G. 2007. Nitric oxide coordinates cell proliferation and cell movements during early development of Xenopus. Cell Cycle 6: 3132-3144.
51. Plantman S, Ng KC, Lu J, Davidsson J, Risling M. 2012. Characterization of a novel rat model of penetrating traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29: 1219-1232.
52. Portugues R, Engert F. 2009. The neural basis of visual behaviors in the larval zebrafish. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19: 644-647.
53. Roeser T, Baier H. 2003. Visuomotor behaviors in larval zebrafish after GFP-guided laser ablation of the optic tectum. J Neurosci 23: 3726-3734.
54. Schmidt M, Derby CD. 2011. Cytoarchitecture and ultrastructure of neural stem cell niches and neurogenic complexes maintaining adult neurogenesis in the olfactory midbrain of spiny lobsters, Panulirus argus. J Comp Neurol 519: 2283-2319.
55. Sharma P, Cline HT. 2010. Visual activity regulates neural progenitor cells in developing Xenopus CNS through musashi1. Neuron 68: 442-455.
56. Shen W, McKeown CR, Demas JA, Cline HT. 2011. Inhibition to excitation ratio regulates visual system responses and behavior in vivo. J Neurophysiol 106: 2285-2302.
57. Spencer S, Huh L. 2008. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol 7: 525-537.
58. Srebro Z. 1957. Regeneration of the endbrain in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Folia Biol (Krakow) 5: 211-231.
59. Srebro Z. 1959. Investigation on the regenerative capacity of the between brain and the influence of its removal upon the development of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Folia Biol (Krakow) 7: 191-202.
60. Stahel PF, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Kossmann T. 1998. The role of the complement system in traumatic brain injury. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 27: 243-256.
61. Statler KD, Jenkins LW, Dixon CE, Clark RSB, Marion DW, Kochanek PM. 2011. The simple model versus the super model: translating experimental traumatic brain injury research to the bedside. J Neurotrauma 18: 1195-1206.
62. Straznicky K, Gaze R. 1972. The development of the tectum in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic study. J Embryol Exp Morphol 28: 87-115.
63. Sullivan JM, Benton JL, Sandeman DC, Beltz BS. 2007. Adult neurogenesis: a common strategy across diverse species. J Comp Neurol 500: 574-584.
64. Sundholm-Peters NL, Yang HKC, Goings GE, Walker AS, Francis G. Szele FG. 2005. Subventricular zone neuroblasts emigrate toward cortical lesions. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64: 1089-1100.
65. Thored P, Wood J, Arvidsson A, Cammenga J, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. 2007. Long-term neuroblast migration along blood vessels in an area with transient angiogenesis and increased vascularization after stroke. Stroke 38: 3032-3039.
66. Tibber MS, Whitmore AV, Jeffery G. 2006. Cell division and cleavage orientation in the developing retina are regulated by L-DOPA. J Comp Neurol 496: 369-381.
67. Wang Y, Neumann M, Hansen K, Hong SM, Kim S, Noble-Haeusslein L, Liu J. 2011. Fluoxetine increases hippocampal neurogenesis and induces epigenetic factors but does not improve functional recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 28: 259-268.
68. Wirsching HG, Kretz O, Morosan-Puopolo G, Chernogorova P, Theiss C, Brand-Saberi B. 2012. Thymosin beta4 induces folding of the developing optic tectum in the chicken (Gallus domesticus). J Comp Neurol 520: 1650-1662.
69. Witte S, Stier H, Cline HT. 1996. In vivo observations of timecourse and distribution of morphological dynamics in Xenopus retinotectal axon arbors. J Neurobiol 31: 219-234.
70. Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. 2010. Angiogenesis, neurogenesis and brain recovery of function following injury. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 11: 298-308.
71. Yoshino J, Tochinai S. 2004. Successful reconstitution of the non-regenerating adult telencephalon by cell transplantation in Xenopus laevis. Dev Growth Differ 46: 523-534.
72. Zhang F, Clarke JD, Ferretti P. 2000. FGF-2 Up-regulation and proliferation of neural progenitors in the regenerating amphibian spinal cord in vivo. Dev Biol 225: 381-391.
73. Zupanc GK. 2009. Towards brain repair: insights from teleost fish. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20: 683-690.
74. Zupanc GKH, Ott R. 1999. Cell proliferation after lesions in the cerebellum of adult teleost fish: time course, origin, and type of new cells produced. Exp Neurol 160: 78-87.