Accurately measuring outcomes after surgery for adult Chiari i malformation: Determining the most valid and responsive instruments

Neurosurgery

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 820-827

  Godil, Saniya S ^a   Parker, Scott L ^a   Zuckerman, Scott L ^a   Mendenhall, Stephen K ^a   McGirt, Matthew J ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chiari; malformation; Patient reported outcome instruments; Responsiveness; Suboccipital craniectomy; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARNOLD CHIARI MALFORMATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CRANIOTOMY; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL CONDITION IMPROVEMENT; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NECK PAIN; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME INSTRUMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SHORT FORM 12; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ZUNG SELF RATING DEPRESSION SCALE;

ADULT; ARNOLD-CHIARI MALFORMATION; CRANIOTOMY; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMANS; MALE; NECK PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876718043     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182897341     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Chiari H. Concerning alterations in the cerebellum resulting from cerebral hydrocephalus. 1891. Pediatr Neurosci. 1987;13(1):3-8.
2. Speer MC, Enterline DS, Mehltretter L, et al. Review article: Chiari type I malformation with or without syringomyelia: prevalence and Genetics. J Genet Couns. 2003;12(4):297-311.
3. Arnett BC. Tonsillar ectopia and headaches. Neurol Clin. 2004;22(1):229-236.
4. Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM, et al. Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(5):1005-1017.
5. Novegno F, Caldarelli M, Massa A, et al. The natural history of the Chiari Type I anomaly. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2(3):179-187.
6. Di Lorenzo N, Palma L, Palatinsky E, Fortuna A. Conservative cranio-cervical decompression in the treatment of syringomyelia-Chiari I complex. A prospective study of 20 adult cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(23):2479-2483.
7. McGirt MJ, Nimjee SM, Fuchs HE, George TM. Relationship of cine phasecontrast magnetic resonance imaging with outcome after decompression for Chiari I malformations. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(1):140-146; discussion 140-146.
8. Milhorat TH, Bolognese PA. Tailored operative technique for Chiari type I malformation using intraoperative color Doppler ultrasonography. Neurosurgery. 2003;53(4):899-905; discussion 905-6.
9. Strayer A. Chiari I malformation: clinical presentation and management. J Neurosci Nurs. 2001;33(2):90-96, 104.
10. Dyste GN, Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Symptomatic Chiari malformations. An analysis of presentation, management, and long-term outcome. J Neurosurg. 1989; 71(2):159-168.
11. Aghakhani N, Parker F, David P, et al. Long-term follow-up of Chiari-related syringomyelia in adults: analysis of 157 surgically treated cases. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(2):308-315; discussion 315.
12. Imperato A, Seneca V, Cioffi V, Colella G, Gangemi M. Treatment of Chiari malformation: who, when and how. Neurol Sci. 2011;32(supp 3):S335-S339.
13. Navarro R, Olavarria G, Seshadri R, Gonzales-Portillo G, McLone DG, Tomita T. Surgical results of posterior fossa decompression for patients with Chiari I malformation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(5):349-356.
14. Tubbs RS, McGirt MJ, Oakes WJ. Surgical experience in 130 pediatric patients with Chiari I malformations. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(2):291-296.
15. Liebenberg WA, Georges H, Demetriades AK, Hardwidge C. Does posterior fossa decompression improve oculomotor and vestibulo-ocular manifestations in Chiari 1 malformation? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(12):1239-1240; discussion 1240.
16. Fagan LH, Ferguson S, Yassari R, Frim DM. The Chiari pseudotumor cerebri syndrome: symptom recurrence after decompressive surgery for Chiari malformation type I. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(1):14-19.
17. Schijman E. History, anatomic forms, and pathogenesis of Chiari I malformations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(5):323-328.
18. Schijman E, Steinbok P. International survey on the management of Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(5):341-348.
19. Mutchnick IS, Janjua RM, Moeller K, Moriarty TM. Decompression of Chiari malformation with and without duraplasty: morbidity versus recurrence. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(5):474-478.
20. Aitken LA, Lindan CE, Sidney S, et al. Chiari type I malformation in a pediatric population. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;40(6):449-454.
21. McGirt MJ, Attenello FJ, Datoo G, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography as a guide to patient selection for duraplasty after suboccipital decompression in children with Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2(1):52-57.
22. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38(6):633-638.
23. Howell ER. The association between neck pain, theNeck Disability Index and cervical ranges of motion: a narrative review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011;55(3):211-221.
24. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409-415.
25. Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491-502.
26. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
27. Ware J Jr, KosinskiM, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-233.
28. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897-906.
29. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39(4):561-577.
30. Hanley JA,McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36.
31. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain. 1996;65(1):71-76.
32. Quintana JM, Aguirre U, Barrio I, Orive M, Garcia S, Escobar A. Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients' baseline status: what results can be expected? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(4):563-572.
33. Gerlinger C, Schmelter T. Determining the non-inferiority margin for patient reported outcomes. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(5):410-413.
34. Michener LA, Snyder AR, Leggin BG. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain and the effect of surgical status. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(1):115-128.
35. Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Sucato DJ, Sturm PF, Glassman SD. The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 Appearance, Activity, And Pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(23):2079-2083.
36. Maughan EF, Lewis JS. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(9):1484-1494.
37. Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1341-1345.
38. Norman GR, Wyrwich KW, Patrick DL. The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(5):815-822.
39. Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Gysi F, Benz T, Aeschlimann A. Responsiveness of the cervical Northern American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in chronic whiplash. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(2):142-151.
40. Olerud P, Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Ahrengart L, Bergstrom G. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(8):1200-1206.
41. Uwer L, Rotonda C, Guillemin F, et al. Responsiveness of EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C quality of life questionnaires in patients with colorectal cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:70.
42. Dones J, De Jesus O, Colen CB, Toledo MM, Delgado M. Clinical outcomes in patients with Chiari I malformation: a review of 27 cases. Surg Neurol. 2003;60(2): 142-147; discussion 147-148.
43. Erdogan E, Cansever T, Secer HI, et al. The evaluation of surgical treatment options in the Chiari malformation type I. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20(3):303-313.
44. Eule JM, Erickson MA, O'Brien MF, Handler M. Chiari I malformation associated with syringomyelia and scoliosis: a twenty-year review of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in a pediatric population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(13):1451-1455.
45. Aliaga L, Hekman KE, Yassari R, et al. A novel scoring system for assessing Chiari malformation type I treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(3):656-664; discussion 664-5.
46. Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(5):331-338.
47. Stewart M, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Bogduk N, Nicholas M. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32 (5):580-585.
48. Trouli MN, Vernon HT, Kakavelakis KN, Antonopoulou MD, Paganas AN, Lionis CD. Translation of the Neck Disability Index and validation of the Greek version in a sample of neck pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:106.
49. Lee H, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Maher CG, Halaki M, Bae SS. Development and psychometric testing of Korean language versions of 4 neck pain and disability questionnaires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(16):1841-1845.
50. Jacobson GP, Ramadan NM, Aggarwal SK, Newman CW. The Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Neurology. 1994;44(5):837-842.
51. Andrasik F, Lipchik GL, McCrory DC, Wittrock DA. Outcome measurement in behavioral headache research: headache parameters and psychosocial outcomes. Headache. 2005;45(5):429-437.
52. Young IA, Cleland JA, Michener LA, Brown C. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(10):831-839.
53. Stratford PWRD, Binkley JM, SpadoniG, WestawayMD, Padfield B. Using the Neck Disability Index tomake decisions concerning individual patients. Physiother Can. 1999; 51:107-112.
54. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1):69-74.
55. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):400-417.
56. Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(26):3047-3051.
57. Park HJ, Lee ST, ShimJY, et al. The effect of paroxetine on the reduction of migraine frequency is independent of its anxiolytic effect. J Clin Neurol. 2006;2(4): 246-251.
58. Simmonds MK, Rashiq S, Sobolev IA, et al. The effect of single-dose propofol injection on pain and quality of life in chronic daily headache: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1972-1980.
59. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010;10(6):469-474.
60. Usai S, Grazzi L, D'Amico D, Andrasik F, Bussone G. Psychological variables in chronic migraine with medication overuse before and after inpatient withdrawal: results at 1-year follow-up. Neurol Sci. 2009;30(Suppl 1):S125-S127.
61. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Kolodner KB, Steiner TJ, Stewart WF. Migraine, quality of life, and depression: a population-based case-control study. Neurology. 2000;55(5):629-635.
62. Holly LT, Matz PG, Anderson PA, et al. Functional outcomes assessment for cervical degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11(2):238-244.
63. Manca A, Dumville JC, Torgerson DJ, et al. Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care back and neck pain patients: cost effectiveness analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(9):1495-1501.
64. LewisM, James M, Stokes E, et al. An economic evaluation of three physiotherapy treatments for non-specific neck disorders alongside a randomized trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(11):1701-1708.
65. Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(24):2061-2068.
66. Parker SL, Fulchiero EC, Davis BJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy. Spine J. 2011; 11(8):705-711.
67. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Davis BJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(2):138-143.
68. Fritzell P, Berg S, Borgstrom F, Tullberg T, Tropp H. Cost effectiveness of disc prosthesis versus lumbar fusion in patients with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(7):1001-1011.
69. Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F, Jonsson B, Blomqvist P. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(2):210-216.
70. Sarnat HB. Disorders of segmentation of the neural tube: Chiari malformations. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;87:89-103.
71. Alden TD, Ojemann JG, Park TS. Surgical treatment of Chiari I malformation: indications and approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;11(1):E2.