Erratum: Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis: Clinical article (Jounal of Neurosurgery: Spine (2011) DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10562);Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis: Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 138-143

  Adogwa, Owoicho ^a,b   Parker, Scott L ^a,b   Davis, Brandon J ^a,b   Aaronson, Oran ^a,b   Devin, Clinton ^a   Cheng, Joseph S ^a,b   McGirt, Matthew J ^a,b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CALCULATION; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; MALE; MEDICARE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TAX; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 80051674607     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10562a     Document Type: Erratum

References (21)

1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleâs F: Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1424-1436, 2000
2. Badia X, Diaz-Prieto A, Gorriz MT, Herdman M, Torrado H, Farrero E, et al: Using the EuroQol-5D to measure changes in quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:1901-1907, 2001 (Pubitemid 33145076)
3. Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB: A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 275:858-865, 1996 (Pubitemid 26087223)
4. Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC: Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7:541-546, 2007 (Pubitemid 47471437)
5. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK: Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350:722-726, 2004 (Pubitemid 38364632)
6. Drewett RF, Minns RJ, Sibly TF: Measuring outcome of total knee replacement using quality of life indices. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74:286-290, 1992
7. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66: 271-273, 1980 (Pubitemid 11234479)
8. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jonsson D, Nordwall A: Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:421-434, 2004
9. Glassman SD, Polly DW, Dimar JR, Carreon LY: The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at five years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print], 2010
10. Hodgson TA, Meiners MR: Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 60:429-462, 1982
11. Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, Sato K, Kurosaka M, Yamasaki K: Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1754-1759, 2000
12. Jansson KA, Németh G, Granath F, Jönsson B, Blomqvist P: Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:210-216, 2009
13. Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN, Pope MH, Katz JN: Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1132-1139, 2000
14. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, et al: Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3:129-141, 2005
15. Tosteson AN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Herkowitz H, Albert T, et al: Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis withand without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. Ann Intern Med 149:845-853, 2008
16. Tosteson AN, Skinner JS, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Andersson GB, Berven S, et al: The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2108-2115, 2008
17. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA: An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 12:694-699, 2010
18. Weiner DK, Kim YS, Bonino P, Wang T: Low back pain in older adults: are we utilizing healthcare resources wisely? Pain Med 7:143-150, 2006
19. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES: United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2707-2714, 2006
20. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, et al: Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356:2257-2270, 2007 (Pubitemid 46849156)
21. Wong JB, Singh G, Kavanaugh A: Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 54 weeks of infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med 113:400-408, 2002 (Pubitemid 35223612)