Land-use and land-cover change detection

Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing: Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 273-288

  Lu, Dengsheng ^a   Moran, Emilio ^a   Hetrick, Scott ^a   Li, Guiying ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876710899     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (99)

1. Althausen, J. D. 2002. What remote sensing system should be used to collect the data? In Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology, ed. J. D. Bossler, J. R. Jensen, R. B. McMaster, and C. Rizos, 276. New York: Taylor & Francis.
2. Anderson, G. L., and J. D. Hanson. 1992. Evaluating handheld radiometer derived vegetation indices for estimating above ground biomass. Geocarto Int 7: 71.
3. Anderson, G. L., J. D. Hanson, and R. H. Haas. 1993. Evaluating Landsat Thematic Mapper derived vegetation indices for estimating aboveground biomass on semiarid rangelands. Rem Sens Environ 45: 165.
4. Aplin, P., P. M. Atkinson, and P. J. Curran. 1999. Per-field classification of land use using the forthcoming very fine spatial resolution satellite sensors: problems and potential solutions. In Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis, ed. P. M. Atkinson and N. J. Tate, 219. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Asner, G. P., and K. B. Heidebrecht. 2002. Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions: Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral observations. Int J Rem Sens 23: 3939.
6. Barnsley, M. J. 1999. Digital remote sensing data and their characteristics. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Applications, and Management, 2nd ed, ed. P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind, 451. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Biging, G. S. et al. 1999. “Accuracy assessment of remote sensing-detected change detection,” Monograph Series, ed. S. Khorram. Maryland: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
8. Blackburn, G. A., and C. M. Steele. 1999. Towards the remote sensing of Matorral vegetation physiology: Relationships between spectral reflectance, pigment, and biophysical characteristics of semiarid bushland canopies. Rem Sens Environ 70: 278.
9. Blaschke, T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Rem Sens 65: 2.
10. Carvalho, L. M. T. et al. 2001. Digital change detection with the aid of multiresolution wavelet analysis. Int J Rem Sens 22: 3871.
11. Chavez Jr., P. S. 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections-revisited and improved. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 62: 1025.
12. Chavez Jr., P. S., and D. J. Mackinnon. 1994. Automatic detection of vegetation changes in the southwestern United States using remotely sensed images. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 60: 571.
13. Chander, G., B. L. Markham, and D. L. Helder. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Rem Sens Environ 113: 893.
14. Civco, D. L. 1989. Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper digital imagery. Photogramm Eng and Rem Sens 55: 1303.
15. Colby, J. D. 1991. Topographic normalization in rugged terrain. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 57: 531.
16. Congalton, R. G., R. G. Oderwald, and R. A. Mead. 1983. Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 49: 1671.
17. Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Rem Sens Environ 37: 35.
18. Congalton, R. G., and L. Plourde. 2002. Quality assurance and accuracy assessment of information derived from remotely sensed data. In Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology, ed. J. Bossler, 349. London: Taylor & Francis.
19. Congalton, R. G., and K. Green. (2008). Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed, 183. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
20. Coppin, P. R., and M. E. Bauer. 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Rem Sens Rev 13: 207.
21. Coppin, P. et al. 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. Int J Rem Sens 25: 1565.
22. Dai, X. L., and S. Khorram. 1998. The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 36: 1566.
23. Deer, P. J. 1995. Digital change detection techniques: Civilian and military applications, International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research 1995 Report. Greenbelt, MD: Goddard Space Flight Center.
24. Dhakal, A. S. et al. 2002. Detection of areas associated with flood and erosion caused by a heavy rainfall using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 68: 233.
25. Dougherty, M. et al. 2004. Evaluation of impervious surface estimates in a rapidly urbanizing watershed. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 70: 1275.
26. Du, Y., P. M. Teillet, and J. Cihlar. 2002. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Rem Sens Environ 82: 123.
27. Eastwood, J. A. et al. 1997. The reliability of vegetation indices for monitoring saltmarsh vegetation cover. Int J Rem Sens 18: 3901.
28. Elvidge, C. D., and Z. Chen. 1995. Comparison of broad-band and narrow-band red and near-infrared vegetation indices. Rem Sens Environ 54: 38.
29. Estes, J. E., and T. R. Loveland. 1999. Characteristics, sources, and management of remotely-sensed data. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Applications, and Management, 2nd ed., eds. P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind, 667. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Foody, G. M. 1996. Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classification from remotely-sensed data. Int J Rem Sens 17: 1317.
31. Foody, G. M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Rem Sens Environ 80: 185.
32. Franklin, S. E. et al. 2002. Evidential reasoning with Landsat TM, DEM and GIS data for land cover classification in support of grizzly bear habitat mapping. Int J Rem Sens 23: 4633.
33. Fung, T. 1990. An assessment of TM imagery for land-cover change detection. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 28: 681.
34. Gallego, F. J. 2004. Remote sensing and land-cover area estimation. Int J Rem Sens 25: 3019.
35. Ghimire, B., J. Rogan, and J. Miller. 2010. Contextual land cover classification: Incorporating spatial dependence in land cover classification models using random forests and the Getis statistic. Rem Sens Lett 1: 45.
36. Gilabert, M. A., C. Conese, and F. Maselli. 1994. An atmospheric correction method for the automatic retrieval of surface reflectance from TM images. Int J Rem Sens 15: 2065.
37. Gong, P., and P. J. Howarth. 1992. Frequency-based contextual classification and gray-level vector reduction for land-use identification. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 58: 423.
38. Green, K., D. Kempka, and L. Lackey. 1994. Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 60: 331.
39. Heo, J., and T. W. FitzHugh. 2000. A standardized radiometric normalization method for change detection using remotely sensed imagery. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 66: 173.
40. Janssen, L. F. J., and F. J. M. van der Wel. 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 60: 419.
41. Jennings, D. B., S. T. Jarnagin, and C. W. Ebert. 2004. A modeling approach for estimating watershed impervious surface area from national land cover data 92. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 70: 1295.
42. Jensen, J. R., and D. L. Toll. 1982. Detecting residential land use development at the urban fringe. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 48: 629.
43. Jensen, J. R. (2005). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 3rd ed., 526. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44. Kalkhan, M. A., R. M. Reich, and R. L. Czaplewski. 1997. Variance estimates and confidence intervals for the Kappa measure of classification accuracy. Can J Rem Sens 23: 210.
45. Kennedy, R. E. et al. 2009. Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: Understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Rem Sens Environ 113: 1382.
46. Kontoes, C. et al. 1993. An experimental system for the integration of GIS data in knowledge-based image analysis for remote sensing of agriculture. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 7: 247.
47. Lam, N. S. 2008. Methodologies for mapping land cover/land use and its change. In Advances in Land Remote Sensing: System, Modeling, Inversion and Application, ed. S. Liang, 341. New York: Spinger.
48. Landgrebe, D. A. (2003). Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing, 508. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
49. Lefsky, M. A., and W. B. Cohen. 2003. Selection of remotely sensed data. In Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies, eds. M. A. Wulder, and S. E. Franklin, 13. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
50. Lobell, D. B. et al. 2002. View angle effects on canopy reflectance and spectral mixture analysis of coniferous forests using AVIRIS. Int J Rem Sens 23: 2247.
51. Lowell, K., 2001. An area-based accuracy assessment methodology for digital change maps. Int J Rem Sens 22: 3571.
52. Lu, D. et al. 2002. Assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat TM data applicable to Amazon basin LBA research. Int J Rem Sens 23: 2651.
53. Lu, D. et al. 2004. Change detection techniques. Int J Rem Sens 25: 2365.
54. Lu, D. et al. 2005. Land-cover binary change detection methods for use in the moist tropical region of the Amazon: A comparative study. Int J Rem Sens 26: 101.
55. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2005. Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+ imagery in Marion County. Indiana Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 71: 1275.
56. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2006. Use of impervious surface in urban land use classification. Rem Sens Environ 102: 146.
57. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Rem Sens 28: 823.
58. Lu, D., M. Batistella, and E. Moran. 2008a. Integration of Landsat TM and SPOT HRG images for vegetation change detection in the Brazilian Amazon. Photogramm Eng and Rem Sens 70: 421.
59. Lu, D. et al. 2008b. Pixel-based Minnaert correction method for reducing topographic effects on the Landsat 7 ETM+ image. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 74: 1343.
60. Macleod, R. D., and R. G. Congalton. 1998. A quantitative comparison of change-detection algorithms for monitoring eelgrass from remotely sensed data. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 64: 207.
61. Markham, B. L., and J. L. Barker. 1987. Thematic Mapper bandpass solar exoatmospheric irradiances. Int J Rem Sens 8: 517.
62. Mas, J. F. 1999. Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. Int J Rem Sens 20: 139.
63. McGovern, E. A. et al. 2002. The radiometric normalization of multitemporal Thematic Mapper imagery of the midlands of Ireland-a case study. Int J Rem Sens 23: 751.
64. Meyer, P. et al. 1993. Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in alpine environment. ISPRS J Photogramm Rem Sens 48: 17.
65. Michener, W. K., and P. F. Honhoulis. 1997. Detection of vegetation associated with extensive flooding in a forested ecosystem. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 63: 1363.
66. Morisette, J. T., and S. Khorram. 2000. Accuracy assessment curves for satellite-based change detection. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 66: 875.
67. Muchoney, D. M., and B. N. Haack. 1994. Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 60: 1243.
68. Mutanga, O., and A. K. Skidmore. 2004. Narrow band vegetation indices overcome the saturation problem in biomass estimation. Int J Rem Sens 25: 3999.
69. Myint, S. W. 2001. A robust texture analysis and classification approach for urban land-use and landcover feature discrimination. Geocarto Int 16: 27.
70. Neville, R. A. et al. 2003. Spectral unmixing of hyperspectral imagery for mineral exploration: Comparison of results from SFSI and AVIRIS. Can J Rem Sens 29: 99.
71. Okin, G. S. et al. 2001. Practical limits on hyperspectral vegetation discrimination in arid and semiarid environments. Rem Sens Environ 77: 212.
72. Pal, M., and P. M. Mather. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Rem Sens Environ 86: 554.
73. Platt, R. V., and A. F. H. Goetz. 2004. A comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat for land use classification at the urban fringe. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 70: 813.
74. Rashed, T. et al. 2001. Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multispectral satellite imagery: A case study of the Greater Cairo region. Egypt Geocarto Int 16: 5.
75. San Miguel-Ayanz, J., and G. S. Biging. 1997. Comparison of single-stage and multi-stage classification approaches for cover type mapping with TM and SPOT data. Rem Sens Environ 59: 92.
76. Serpico, S. B., and L. Bruzzone. 1999. Change detection. In Information Processing for Remote Sensing, ed. C. H. Chen, 319. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
77. Shaban, M. A., and O. Dikshit. 2001. Improvement of classification in urban areas by the use of textural features: The case study of Lucknow city. Uttar Pradesh Int J Rem Sens 22: 565.
78. Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. Int J Rem Sens 10: 989.
79. Smits, P.C., S. G. Dellepiane, and R. A. Schowengerdt. 1999. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. Int J Rem Sens 20: 1461.
80. Song, C. et al. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effect. Rem Sens Environ 75: 230.
81. Stefan, S., and K. I. Itten. 1997. A physically-based model to correct atmospheric and illumination effects in optical satellite data of rugged terrain. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 35: 708.
82. Stow, D. A. 1999. Reducing the effects of misregistration on pixel-level change detection. Int J Rem Sens 20: 2477.
83. Stow, D. A., and D. M. Chen. 2002. Sensitivity of multitemporal NOAA AVHRR data of an urbanizing region to land-use/land-cover change and misregistration. Rem Sens Environ 80: 297.
84. Stuckens, J., P. R. Coppin, and M. E. Bauer. 2000. Integrating contextual information with per-pixel classification for improved land cover classification. Rem Sens Environ 71: 282.
85. Teillet, P. M., B. Guindon, and D. G. Goodenough. 1982. On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Can J Rem Sens 8: 84.
86. Tokola, T., S. Löfman, and A. Erkkilä. 1999. Relative calibration of multitemporal Landsat data for forest cover change detection. Rem Sens Environ 68: 1.
87. Townshend, J. R. G. et al. 1992. The effect of image misregistration on the detection of vegetation change. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 30: 1054.
88. Tso, B., and P. M. Mather. (2001). Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. New York: Taylor & Francis.
89. Verbyla, D. L., and S. H. Boles. 2000. Bias in land cover change estimates due to misregistration. Int J Rem Sens 21: 3553.
90. Vermote, E. et al. 1997. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: An overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 35: 675.
91. Vicente-Serrano, S. M., F. Pérez-Cabello, and T. Lasanta. 2008. Assessment of radiometric correction techniques in analyzing vegetation variability and change using time series of Landsat images. Rem Sens Environ 112: 3916.
92. Weber, K. T. 2001. A method to incorporate phenology into land cover change analysis. J Range Manage 54: A1.
93. Wu, C., and A. T. Murray. 2003. Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis. Rem Sens Environ 84: 493.
94. Wu, X., F. Yang, and R. Lishman. 2010. Land cover change detection using texture analysis. J Comp Sci 6: 92.
95. Yang, X., and C. P. Lo. 2000. Relative radiometric normalization performance for change detection from multi-date satellite images. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 66: 967.
96. Yool, S. R., M. J. Makaio, and J. M. Watts. 1997. Techniques for computer-assisted mapping of rangeland change. J Range Manage 50: 307.
97. Yuan, D., and C. Elvidge. 1998. NALC land cover change detection pilot study: Washington D.C. area experiments. Rem Sens Environ 66: 166.
98. Yuan, D., C. D. Elvidge, and R. S. Lunetta. 1998. Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis. In Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, eds. R. S. Lunetta and C. D. Elvidge, 21. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.
99. Zhou, W., A. Troy, and J. M. Grove. 2008. Object-based land cover classification and change analysis in the Baltimore metropolitan area using multi-temporal high resolution remote sensing data. Sensors 8: 1613.