Participatory development of a new interactive tool for capturing social and ecological dynamism in conservation prioritization

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 114, Issue , 2013, Pages 80-91

  Pert, Petina L ^a   Lieske, Scott N ^b   Hill, Rosemary ^c  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

CHIA; Conservation planning; Participatory decision making; Spatial conservation prioritisation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

BIODIVERSITY PROTECTION; CHIA; CONSERVATION PLANNING; CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION; EXPLORATION OF ALTERNATIVES; HUMID TROPICAL FOREST; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SPATIAL CONSERVATION PRIORITISATION;

DECISION MAKING;

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INVESTMENT; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PRIORITIZATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; TROPICAL FOREST;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84876705736     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agostini V.N., Margules S.W., Schill S.R., Knowles J.E., Blyther R.J. Marine zoning in Saint Kitts and Nevis: A path towards sustainable management of marine resources 2010, The Nature Conservancy, Florida, USA. http://www.marineplanning.org/pdf/StKitts_Nevis_Full_Report.pdf.
2. Balmford A., Gaston K.J., Blyth S., James A., Kapos V. Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:1046-1050.
3. Bohnet I., Pert P.L. Patterns, drivers and impacts of urban growth-A study from Cairns, Queensland, Australia from 1952-2031. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 97:239-248.
4. Bohnet I.C., Robeling P.C., Williams K.J., Holzworth D., van Grieken M.E., Pert P.L., et al. Landscapes Toolkit: An integrated modelling framework to assist stakeholders in exploring options for sustainable landscape development. Landscape Ecology 2011, 26:1179-1198.
5. Bojórquez-Tapia L.A., Sánchez-Colon S., Martinez A.F. Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis. Environmental Management 2005, 36(3):469-481.
6. Brown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources 2005, 18:17-39.
7. Brown T.C. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics 1984, 60:231-246.
8. Brown G., Smith C., Alessa L., Kliskey A. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography 2004, 24:161-180.
9. Bryan B.A., Crossman N.D., King D., Meyer W.S. Landscape futures analysis: Assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environment Modelling and Software 2011, 26(1):83-91.
10. Bryan B.A., Grandgirard A., Ward J.R. Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 2010, 13:539-555.
11. CEPLA Biodiversity significance of Mission Beach. A report to Terrain Natural Resource Management Ltd 2007, Chenoweth Environmental Planning and Landscape Architecture (CEPLA), Brisbane.
12. Cocks D., Ive J. Mediatiation support for forest land allocation: The SIRO-MED system. Environmental Management 1996, 20(1):41-52.
13. Cowling R.M., Egoh B., Knight A.T., O'Farrell P.J., Reyers B., Rouget'll M., et al. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(28):9483-9488.
14. Creighton J. The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement 2005, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
15. Crossman N.D., Bryan B.A. Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:654-668.
16. Crossman N.D., Bryan B.A., King D. Contribution of site assessment toward prioritising investment in natural capital. Environment Modelling and Software 2011, 26(1):30-37.
17. Dalton T., Forrester G., Pollnac R. Participation, process quality, and performance of marine protected areas in the wider Caribbean. Environmental Management 2012, 49(6):1224-1237.
18. Feick R.D., Hall G.B. A method for examining the spatial dimension of multi-criteria weight sensitivity. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 2004, 18(8):815-840.
19. FNQ NRM Ltd., Rainforest CRC Sustaining the wet tropics: A regional plan for natural resource management 2004-2008 2004, FNQ NRM Ltd., Innisfail.
20. Goosen H., Janssen R., Vermaat J.E. Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. Ecological Engineering 2007, 30(2):187-199.
21. Greenwood D.J., Levin M. Introduction to action research 2007, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
22. Hajkowicz S. Cutting the cake: Supporting environmental fund allocation deicsions. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:2737-2745.
23. Hajkowicz S., Higgins A. A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 184(1):255-265.
24. Halvorsen K. Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administartion Review 2003, 63:535-544.
25. Hill R., O'Malley T. Mission Beach Habitat Network Action Plan Community workshop outcomes final draft 2008, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems and Terrain NRM Ltd., Cairns.
26. Hill R., Williams K.J., Pert P.L., Robinson C.J., Dale A.P., Westcott D.A., et al. Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia's tropical rainforests. Environmental Conservation 2010, 37(1):73-82.
27. Jones N.A., Perez P., Measham T.G., Kelly G.J., d'Aquino P., Daniell K.A., et al. Evaluating participatory modeling: Developing a framework for cross-case analysis. Environmental Management 2009, 44(6):1180-1195.
28. Justus J., Sarkar S. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: A preliminary history. Journal of Biosciences 2002, 27(4):421-435.
29. Kirkpatrick J.B. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves-An example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 1983, 25:127-134.
30. Kittel T., Howard S., Horn H., Kittel G., Fairbarns M., Iachetti P. A vulnerability-based strategy for incorporating the climate threat in conservation planning: A case study from the British Columbia Central Interior. Journal of Ecosystems and Management 2011, 12(1):7-35.
31. Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., Rouget M., Balmford A., Lombard A.T., Campbell B.M. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conservation Biology 2008, 22(3):610-617.
32. Lagabrielle E., Rouget M., Le Bourgeois T., Payet K., Durieux L., Baret S., et al. Integrating conservation, restoration and land-use planning in islands-An illustrative case study in Réunion Island (Western Indian Ocean). Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 101(2):120-130.
33. Latch P. National recovery plan for the southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius johnsonii 2007-2011. Report to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra 2007, Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane.
34. Lewis J.L., Sheppard S.R.J. Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77(3):291-313.
35. Lockwood M. Humans valuing nature: Synthesising insights from philsophy, psychology and economics. Environmental Values 1999, 8:381-401.
36. Luz F. Participatory landscape ecology-A basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 50(1-3):157-166.
37. Lynam T., de Jong W., Sheil D., Kusumanto T., Evans K. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1):5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art5/.
38. Malczewski J. On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: Common and best practice approaches. Transactions in GIS 2000, 4(1):5-22.
39. McCall, M.K. pgis-psp-lsk: Applying participatory-GIS and participatory mapping to participatory spatial planning (in particular to local-level land & resources management) utilising local & indigenous spatial knowledge: A bibliography. (2012). http://ppgis.iapad.org/pdf/pgis_psp_lks_biblio_nov2012.pdf.
40. McCall M.K., Dunn C.E. Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for 'good' governance?. Geoforum 2012, 43:81-94.
41. McIntyre N., Moore J., Yuan M. A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Society and Natural Resources 2008, 21:657-670.
42. Mendoza G.A., Prabhu R. Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 207(1-2):145-156.
43. Minister for Infrastructure Planning Far North Queensland regional plan 2009-2031 2009, Queensland Government Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Brisbane.
44. Moilanen A., Kujala H., Leathwick J.R. The zonation framework and software for conservation prioritization. Spatial conservation prioritization. Quantitative methods and computational tools 2009, 196-210. Oxford University Press, New York. K. Moilanen, A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
45. Spatial conservation prioritization. Quantitative methods and computational tools 2009, Oxford University Press, New York. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
46. Nyerges T., Jankowski P. Regional and urban GIS: A decision support approach 2010, Guilford Press, New York.
47. Pereira A.G., Quintana S.C. From technocratic to participatory decision support systems: Responding to new governance initiatives. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 2002, 6:95-107.
48. Pert P.L., Hill R., Williams K.J., Harding E.K., O'Malley T., Grace R.A., et al. Scenarios for community-based approaches to biodiversity conservation: A case study from the wet tropics, Queensland, Australia. Australian Geographer 2010, 41(3):285-306.
49. Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology 1999, 13:484-492.
50. Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning for the real world. Parks 1999, 9:1-6.
51. Proctor W., Drechsler M. Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2006, 24(2):169-190.
52. Ramsey K. GIS, modeling, and politics: On the tensions of collaborative decision support. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1972-1980.
53. Ratcliffe D.A. Criteria for the selection of nature reserves. Advancement of Science 1971, 27:296-297.
54. Raymond C.M., Brown G. A method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2006, 49(6):797-812.
55. Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., Hatton MacDonald D., Cast A., Strathearn S., Grandgirand A., et al. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:1301-1315.
56. Regan H.M., Ensby M.J., Burgman M.A. Conservation prioritization and uncertainty in planning inputs. Spatial conservation prioritization. Quantitative methods and computational tools 2009, 145-157. Oxford University Press, New York. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
57. Riolo, F. PANDA (protected areas network design application). (2005). http://www.mappamondogis.it/.
58. Robins L., Dovers S. Community-based NRM boards of management: Are they up to the task?. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 14(2):111-122.
59. Rowe G., Frewer L. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 2005, 30:251-290.
60. Salter J.D., Campbell C., Journeay M., Sheppard S.R.J. The digital workshop: Exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(6):2090-2101.
61. Sarkar S., Pressey R.L., Faith D.P., Margules C.R., Fuller T., Stoms D.M., et al. Biodiviersity conservation planning tools: Present staus and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 2006, 31:123-159.
62. Segan D.B., Game E.T., Watts M.E., Stewart R.R., Possingham H.P. An interoperable decision support tool for conservation planning. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26(12):1434-1441.
63. Sheppard S.R.J., Meitner M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 207(1-2):171-187.
64. Smith R.J. Conservation land-use zoning (CLUZ) software 2004, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology. http://www.kent.ac.uk/dice/cluz/.
65. Stirling A. Analysis, participation and power: Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(1):95-107.
66. Thackway R., Lesslie R. Reporting vegetation condition using the vegetation assets, states and transitions (VAST) framework. Ecological Management and Restoration 2006, 7(s1):S53-S62.
67. Tubbs C.R., Blackwood J.W. Ecological evaluation of land for planning purposes. Biological Conservation 1971, 3:169-172.
68. Valencia-Sandoval C., Flanders D.N., Kozak R.A. Participatory landscape planning and sustainable community development: Methodological observations from a case study in rural Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 94(1):63-70.
69. Walker D., Daniels T. The planners guide to CommunityViz: The essential tool for a new generation of planning 2011, American Planning Association, Chicago.
70. Weeks R., Russ G.R., Bucol A.A., Alcala A.C. Incorporating local tenure in the systematic design of marine protected area networks. Conservation Letters 2010, 3(6):445-453.
71. Williams G. An index for the ranking of wildfowl habitats, as applied to eleven sites in West Surrey, England. Biological Conservation 1980, 18:92-99.
72. Williams K.J., Hill R., Pert P.L., Harding E., O'Malley T. Current, pre-clearing and 2025 scenarios of vegetation cover and cassowary habitat in Mission Beach and surrounds. Paper presented at the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility annual conference 2008.
73. Wilson K.A., Carwardine J., Possingham H.P. Setting conservation priorities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, 1162:237-264.