Rainfall interception by maize canopy: Development and application of a process-based model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 489, Issue , 2013, Pages 246-255

  Frasson, Renato Prata de Moraes ^a   Krajewski, Witold F ^b,c  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c not available   (United States)

Author keywords

Canopy architecture; Computational modeling; Drop size distribution; Maize; Rainfall interception

Indexed keywords

CROPS; EVAPORATION; KINETIC ENERGY; KINETICS; PLANTS (BOTANY); RAIN; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOIL MOISTURE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION;

CANOPY ARCHITECTURES; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DROP SIZE DISTRIBUTION; MAIZE; RAINFALL INTERCEPTION;

DROPS;

CANOPY; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; COALESCENCE; CROP; EVAPORATION; FOLIAGE; MAIZE; RAINFALL; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; SOIL EROSION; SOIL WATER; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; THROUGHFALL;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84876701047     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Armstrong C.L., Mitchell J.K. Transformations of rainfall by plant canopy. Trans. ASAE 1987, 30(3):688-696.
2. Armstrong C.L., Mitchell J.K. Plant canopy characteristics and processes which affect transformation of rainfall properties. Trans. ASAE 1988, 31(5):1400-1409.
3. Bassette C., Bussière F. 3-D modelling of the banana architecture for simulation of rainfall interception parameters. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 129(1-2):95-100.
4. Bassette C., Bussière F. Partitioning of splash and storage during raindrop impacts on banana leaves. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148(6-7):991-1004.
5. Brandt C.J. The size distribution of throughfall drops under vegetation canopies. Catena 1989, 16(4-5):507-524.
6. Bui E.N., Box J.R. Stemflow, rain throughfall and erosion under canopies of corn and sorghum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1992, 56:242-247.
7. Bussière F., Solmon F., Fouere A. Implementation and evaluation of DROP, a model for the simulation of rainfall distribution below plants described in 3D. Agronomie 2002, 22(1):93-103.
8. Butler D.R., Huband N.D.S. Throughfall and stem-flow in wheat. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1985, 35(1-4):329-338.
9. Calder I.R. A stochastic model of rainfall interception. J. Hydrol. 1986, 89(1-2):65-71.
10. Calder I.R. Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size. 1. Development of the two-layer stochastic model. J. Hydrol. 1996, 185(1-4):363-378.
11. de Ploey J. A stemflow equation for grasses and similar vegetation. Catena 1982, 9:139-152.
12. Frasson, R.P.d.M., Cunha, L.K.d., Krajewski, W.F., 2011. Assessment of the Thies optical disdrometer performance. Atmos. Res. 101(1-2), 237-255.
13. Frasson, R.P.d.M., Krajewski, W.F., 2010. Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. Agric. For. Meteorol. 150(3), 478-488.
14. Frasson, R.P.d.M., Krajewski, W.F., 2011. Characterization of the drop-size distribution and velocity-diameter relation of the throughfall under the maize canopy. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151(9), 1244-1251.
15. Gash J.H.C. An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1979, 105:43-55.
16. Gunn R., Kinzer G.D. The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. J. Meteorol. 1949, 6(4):243-248.
17. Hall R.L. Interception loss as a function of rainfall and forest types: stochastic modelling for tropical canopies revisited. J. Hydrol. 2003, 280(1-4):1-12.
18. Hartley G.S., Brunskill R.T. Surface Phenomena in Chemistry and Biology 1958, 214-223. Pergamon Press, London. J.F. Danielli (Ed.).
19. Haynes J.L. Ground rainfall under vegetative canopy of crops. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 1940, 32:176-184.
20. Hornbuckle, B.K., England, A.W., Anderson, M.C., 2007. The effect of intercepted precipitation on the microwave emission of maize at 1.4 GHz. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 45(7), 1988-1995.
21. Keim, R.F., Skaugset, A.E., 2004. A linear system model of dynamic throughfall rates beneath forest canopies. Water Resour. Res. 40(5).
22. Keim R.F., Skaugset A.E., Link T.E., Iroume A. A stochastic model of throughfall for extreme events. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2004, 8(1):23-34.
23. Keim R.F., Skaugset A.E., Weiler M. Storage of water on vegetation under simulated rainfall of varying intensity. Adv. Water Resour. 2006, 29(7):974-986.
24. Lamm F.R., Manges H.L. Partitioning of sprinkler irrigation water by a corn canopy. Trans. ASAE 2000, 43(4):909-918.
25. Levia D.F., Frost E.E. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. J. Hydrol. 2003, 274(1-4):1-29.
26. Magarey R.D., Seem R.C., Russo J.M. Grape canopy surface wetness: simulation versus visualization and measurement. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2006, 139(3-4):361-372.
27. Miralles, D.G., Gash, J.H., Holmes, T.R.H., de Jeu, R.A.M., Dolman, A.J., 2010. Global canopy interception from satellite observations. J. Geophys. Res. 115(D16), D16122.
28. Murakami S. A proposal for a new forest canopy interception mechanism: splash droplet evaporation. J. Hydrol. 2006, 319(1-4):72-82.
29. Muzylo A., et al. A review of rainfall interception modelling. J. Hydrol. 2009, 370(1-4):191-206.
30. Nanko K., Hotta N., Suzuki M. Evaluating the influence of canopy species and meteorological factors on throughfall drop size distribution. J. Hydrol. 2006, 329(3-4):422-431.
31. Nanko K., Mizugaki S., Onda Y. Estimation of soil splash detachment rates on the forest floor of an unmanaged Japanese cypress plantation based on field measurements of throughfall drop sizes and velocities. Catena 2008, 72(3):348-361.
32. Norman J.M., Campbell G.S. Application of a plant-environment model to problems in irrigation. Advances in Irrigation 1983, 155-188. Academic Press, New York. D.I. Hillel (Ed.).
33. Nosonovsky, M., 2007. Model for solid-liquid and solid-solid friction of rough surfaces with adhesion hysteresis. J. Chem. Phys. 126(22).
34. Nosonovsky, M., Bhushan, B., 2008. Energy transitions in superhydrophobicity: low adhesion, easy flow and bouncing. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20(39).
35. Parkin T.B., Codling E.E. Rainfall distribution under a corn canopy - implications for managing agrochemicals. Agron. J. 1990, 82(6):1166-1169.
36. Rutter A.J., Kershaw K.A. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests, 1. Derivation of the model for observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1971, 9:367-384.
37. Rutter A.J., Morton A.J. Predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. 3. Sensitivity of model to stand parameters and meteorological variables. J. Appl. Ecol. 1977, 14(2):567-588.
38. Rutter A.J., Morton A.J., Robins P.C. Predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. 2. Generalization of model and comparison with observations in some coniferous and hardwood stands. J. Appl. Ecol. 1975, 12(1):367-380.
39. Steiner J.L., Kanemasu E.T., Clark R.N. Spray losses and partitioning of water under a center pivot sprinkler system. Trans. ASAE 1983, 26(4):1128-1134.
40. van Dijk A., Bruijnzeel L.A. Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 1. Model description. J. Hydrol. 2001, 247(3-4):230-238.
41. van Dijk A., Bruijnzeel L.A. Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 2. Model validation for a tropical upland mixed cropping system. J. Hydrol. 2001, 247(3-4):239-262.
42. Wang P.K., Pruppacher H.R. Acceleration to terminal velocity of cloud and raindrops. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1977, 16(3):275-280.
43. Watanabe T., Yamaguchi I. The specific adhesional forces of aqueous droplets on crop leaf surfaces and factors influencing them. J. Pest. Sci. 1993, 18:99-107.
44. Yang X.S., Madden L.V. Effect of ground cover, rain intensity and strawberry plants on splash of simulated raindrops. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1993, 65(1-2):1-20.