A stochastic model of throughfall for extreme events

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-34

  Keim, R F ^a   Skaugset, A E ^b   Link, T E ^c   Iroume A ^d  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Canopy interception; Landslides; Linear systems; Rainfall intensity; Stochastic rainfall modelling; Throughfall

Indexed keywords

EVAPORATION; EXTREME EVENT; FOREST CANOPY; INTERCEPTION; RAINFALL; STOCHASTICITY; THROUGHFALL;

EID: 2542448348     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-8-23-2004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baffaut, C., Nearing, M.A. and Govers, G., 1998. Statistical distributions of soil loss from runoff plots and WEPP model simulations. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 62, 756-763.
2. Benda, L. and Dunne, T., 1997a. Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow. Water Resour. Res., 33, 2849-2863.
3. Benda, L. and Duane, T., 1997b. Stochastic forcing of sediment routing and storage in channel networks. Water Resour. Res., 33, 2865-2880.
4. Beven, K.J. and Binley, A.M., 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Process., 6, 279-298.
5. Burlando, P. and Rosso, R., 2002. Effects of transient climate change on basin hydrology. 2. Impacts on runoff variability in the Arno River, central Italy. Hydrol. Process., 16, 1177-1199.
6. Caine, N., 1980. The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geogr. Ann., 62A. 23-27.
7. Calder, I.R., 1977. A model of transpiration and interception loss from a spruce forest in Plynlimon. central Wales. J. Hydrol., 33, 247-265.
8. Cameron, D.S., Beven, K.J., Tawn, J., Blazkova, S. and Naden, P., 1999. Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty). J Hydrol., 219, 169-187.
9. Dooge, J.C.I., 1959. A general theory of the unit hydrograph. J. Geophys. Res., 64, 241-256.
10. Dooge, J.C.I., 1973. Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems. USDA Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin No. 1468, 327pp.
11. Gash, J.H.C., 1979. An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 105, 43-55.
12. Gash, J.H.C., Valente, F. and David, J.S., 1999. Estimates and measurements of evaporation from wet, sparse pine forest in Portugal. Agric. Forest. Meteorol., 94, 149-158.
13. Gupta, V.K. and Waymire, E., 1993. A statistical analysis of mesoscale rainfall as a random cascade. J. Appl. Meteorol., 32, 251-267.
14. Hall, J. and Anderson, M., 2002. Handling uncertainty in extreme or unrepeatable hydrological processes-the need for an alternative paradigm. Hydrol. Process., 16, 1867-1870.
15. Hosking, J.R.M., 1990. L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B. 52, 105-124.
16. Iroumé, A. and Huber, A., 2002. Comparison of interception losses in a broadleaf native forest and a Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) plantation in the Andes Mountains of southern Chile. Hydrol. Process., 16, 2347-2361.
17. Keefer, D.K., Wilson, R.C., Mark, R.K., Brabb, E.E., Brown, W.M., Ellen, S.D., Harp, E.L., Wieczorek, G.F., Alger, C.S. and Zatkin, R.S., 1987. Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science. 238, 921-925.
18. Keim, R.F., 2003. Attenuation of Rainfall Intensity by Forest Canopies. Ph.D. Dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA., 150pp.
19. Keim, R.F. and Skaugset, A.E., 2003. Modelling effects of forest canopies on slope stability. Hydrol. Process., 17, 1457-1467.
20. Klaassen, W., 2001. Evaporation from rain-wetted forest in relation to canopy wetness, canopy cover, and net radiation. Water Resour: Res., 37, 3227-3236.
21. Krygier, J.T., 1971. Project completion report on comparative water loss of Douglas-fir and Oregon white oak. Water Resources Research Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
22. Kurothe, R.S. Goel, N.K. and Mathur, B.S., 1997. Derived flood frequency distribution for negatively correlated rainfall intensity and duration. Water Resour. Res., 33, 2103-2107.
23. Larsen, M.C. and Simon, A., 1993. A rainfall intensity-duration threshold for landslides in a humid-tropical environment, Puerto Rico. Geogr. Ann., 75A, 13-23.
24. Leyton, L., Reynolds, E.R.C. and Thompson, F.B., 1967. Rainfall interception in forest and moorland. In: Forest Hydrology, W.E. Sopper and H.W. Lull (Eds.). Pergamon, Oxford, USA. 163-178.
25. Link, T.E., Unsworth, M.H. and Marks, D., 2004. The dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agr. Forest Meteorol. In Press.
26. Massman, W.J., 1983. The derivation and validation of a new model for the interception of rainfall by forests. Agr. Meteorol., 28, 261-286.
27. Menabde, M. and Sivapalan, M., 2000. Modeling of rainfall time series and extremes using bounded random cascade and Levystable distributions. Water Resour. Res., 36, 3293-3300.
28. Murphy, C.E., Jr. and Knoerr, K.R., 1975. The evaporation of intercepted rainfall from a forest stand: an analysis by simulation. Water Resour. Res., 11, 273-280.
29. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10. 282-290.
30. Olsson, J., 1998. Evaluation of a scaling cascade model for temporal rainfall disaggregation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2. 19-30.
31. Ramírez, J.A. and Senarath, S. 2000. A statistical-dynamical parameterization of canopy interception and land surface-atmosphere interactions. J. Climate. 13, 4050-4063.
32. Rupp, D.E., Keim, R.F., Brugnach, M., Ossiander, M. and Selker, J.S., 2000. A scale-variant random cascade model of temporal rainfall. Eos. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 81(48). Fall Meeting Supplement, Abstract NG71B-09.
33. Rutter, A.J., Kershaw, K.A., Robins, P.C. and Morton A.J., 1971. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. 1. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agr. Meteorol., 9, 367-384.
34. Schellekens, J., Scatena, F.N., Bruijnzeel, L.A. and Wickel, A.J., 1999. Modelling rainfall interception by a lowland tropical rain forest in northeastern Puerto Rico. J. Hydrol., 225, 168-184.
35. Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S., 1987. Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 9693-9714.
36. Sellers, P.J., Randall, D.A., Collatz, C.J., Berry, J.A., Field, C.B., Dazlich, D.A., Zhang, C. and Collelo, G.D., 1996. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMs. Part 1: Model formulation. J. Climate, 9, 676-705.
37. Terlien, M.T.J., 1998. The determination of statistical and deterministic hydrological landslide-triggering thresholds. Environ. Geol., 35, 124-130.
38. Tiscareno-Lopez, M., Lopes, V.L., Stone, J.J. and Lane, L.J., 1993. Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP watershed model for rangeland applications. I. Hillslope processes. Trans. ASAE, 36, 1659-1672.
39. Trimble, G.R. Jr. and Weitzman, S., 1954. Effect of a hardwood canopy on rainfall intensities. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union. 35, 226-234.
40. Tucker, G.F. and Bras, R.L., 1998. Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology. Water Resour. Res., 34, 2751-2764.
41. Wilks, D.S. and Wilby, R.L., 1999. The weather generation game: A review of stochastic weather models. Progr. Phys. Geogr., 23, 329-357.
42. Xiao, Q., McPherson, E.G., Ustin, S.L. and Grismer, M.E., 2000a. A new approach to modeling tree rainfall interception. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 29173-29188.
43. Xiao, Q., McPherson, E.G., Ustin, S.L., Grismer, M.E. and Simpson, J.R., 2000b. Winter rainfall interception by two mature open-grown trees in Davis, California. Hydrol. Process., 14, 763-784.