Changes in the expression patterns of the genes involved in the segregation and function of inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages during porcine preimplantation development

Journal of Reproduction and Development

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 151-158

  Fujii, Takashi ^a,b   Sakurai, Nobuyuki ^a   Osaki, Tsubasa ^a   Iwagami, Gentaro ^b   Hirayama, Hiroki ^b   Minamihashi, Akira ^b   Hashizume, Tsutomu ^a   Sawai, Ken ^a  

^a IWATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO RESEARCH ORGANIZATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Elongated embryo; Gene expression; Inner cell mass; Porcine embryo; Trophectoderm

Indexed keywords

SUS;

EID: 84876561305     PISSN: 09168818     EISSN: 13484400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2012-122     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry AC. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 2000; 289: 1188-1190.
2. Kikuchi K, Onishi A, Kashiwazaki N, Iwamoto M, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Akita T, Nagai T. Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1033-1041.
3. Nagai T, Funahashi H, Yoshioka K, Kikuchi K. Up date of in vitro production of porcine embryos. Front Biosci 2006; 11: 2565-2573.
4. Pedersen RA, Wu K, Balakier H. Origin of the inner cell mass in mouse embryos: cell lineage analysis by microinjection. Dev Biol 1986; 117: 581-595.
5. Cross JC. How to make placenta: mechanisms of trophoblast cell differentiation in mice-a review. Placenta 2005; 26 (Suppl 3-9).
6. Kunath T, Strumpf D, Rossant J. Early trophoblast determination and stem cell maintenance in the mouse-a review. Placenta 2004; 25 (Suppl 32-38).
7. Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D, Chambers I, Schöler H, Smith A. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998; 95: 379-391.
8. Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Strumpf D, Takahashi K, Yagi R, Rossant J. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 2005; 123: 917-929.
9. Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Chawengsaksophak K, Beck F, Ros-sant J. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophecto-derm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2005; 132: 2093-2102.
10. Chen L, Yabuuchi A, Eminli S, Takeuchi A, Lu C W, Hochedlinger K, Daley GQ. Cross-regulation of the Nanog and Cdx2 promoters. Cell Res 2009; 19: 1052-1061.
11. Home P, Ray S, Dutta D, Bronshteyn I, Larson M, Paul S. GATA3 is selectively expressed in the trophectoderm of peri-implantation embryo and directly regulates Cdx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 28729-28737.
12. Nishioka N, Yamamoto S, Kiyonari H, Sato H, Sawada A, Ota M, Nakao K, Sasaki H. Tead4 is required for specification of trophectoderm in pre-implantation mouse embryos. Mech Dev 2008; 125: 270-283.
13. Yagi R, Kohn MJ, Karavanova I, Kaneko KJ, Vullhorst D, DePamphilis ML, Buon-anno A. Transcription factor TEAD4 specifes the trophectoderm lineage at the beginning of mammalian development. Development 2007; 134: 3827-3836.
14. Feldman B, Poueymirou W, Papaioannou VE, DeChiara TM, Goldfarb M. Requirement of FGF-4 for postimplantation mouse development. Science 1995; 267: 246-249.
15. Arman E, Haffner-Krausz R, Chen Y, Heath JK, Lonai P. Targeted disruption of fbroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 suggests a role for FGF signaling in pregastrula-tion mammalian development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 5082-5087.
16. Tanaka S, Kunath T, Hadjantonakis AK, Nagy A, Rossant J. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 1998; 282: 2072-2075.
17. Fujii T, Moriyasu S, Hirayama H, Hashizume T, Sawai K. Aberrant expression patterns of genes involved in segregation of inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in bovine embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell Reprogram 2010; 12: 617-625.
18. Hall VJ, Josef C, Yu G, Mette HS, Poul H. Porcine pluripotency cell signaling develops from the inner cell mass to the epiblast during early development. Dev Dyn 2009; 238: 2014-2024.
19. Kirchhof N, Carnwath J W, Lemme E, Anastassiadis K, Schöler H, Niemann H. Expression pattern of Oct-4 in preimplantation embryos of different species. Biol Reprod 2000; 63: 1698-1705.
20. Kuijk E W, Du Puy L, Van Tol HT, Oei CH, Haagsman H P, Colenbrander B, Roelen BA. Differences in early lineage segregation between mammals. Dev Dyn 2008; 237: 918-927.
21. Geisert RD, Brookbank J W, Roberts RM, Bazer F W. Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: II. Cellular remodeling of the porcine blastocyst during elongation on day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1982; 27: 941-955.
22. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryo. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48: 61-73.
23. Nagai T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, Shioya Y, Kuwayama M, Fukushima M, Iwasaki S. Hanada. In-vitro fertilization of pig oocytes by frozen boar spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 84: 585-591.
24. Degrelle SA, Campion E, Cabau C, Piumi F, Reinaud P, Richard C, Renard J P, Hue I. Molecular evidence for a critical period in mural trophoblast development in bovine blastocysts. Dev Biol 2005; 288: 448-460.
25. van Eijk MJ, Van Rooijen MA, Modina S, Scesi L, Folkers G, Van Tol HT, Bev-ers MM, Fisher SR, Lewin HA, Rakacolli D, Galli C, de Vaureix C, Trounson AO, Mummery CL, Gandolf F. Molecular cloning, genetic mapping, and developmental expression of bovine POU5F1. Biol Reprod 1999; 60: 1093-1103.
26. Puy LD, Lopes SM, Haagsman H P, Roelen BA. Analysis of co-expression of OCT4, NANOG and SOX2 in pluripotent cells of the porcine embryo, in vivo and in vitro. The-riogenology 2011; 75: 513-526.
27. Wolf XA, Palle S, Poul H. Three-dimensional localisation of NANOG, OCT4, and E-cadherin in porcine pre- and peri-implantation embryos. Dev Dyn 2011; 240: 204-210.
28. Berg DK, Smith CS, Pearton DJ, Wells DN, Broadhurst R, Donnison M, Pfeffer PL. Trophectoderm lineage determination in cattle. Dev Cell 2011; 20: 244-255.
29. Bauer BK, Isom SC, Spate LD, Whitworth KM, Spollen WG, Blake SM, Springer GK, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Transcriptional profling by deep sequencing identifes differences in mRNA transcript abundance in in vivo-derived versus in vitro-cultured porcine blastocyst stage embryos. Biol Reprod 2010; 83: 791-798.
30. Smith SL, Everts RE, Sung LY, Du F, Page RL, Henderson B, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Nedambale TL, Renard J P, Lewin HA, Yang X, Tian XC. Gene expression of single bovine embryos uncovers significant effects of in vitro maturation, fertilization, and culture. Mol Reprod Dev 2009; 76: 38-47.
31. Home P, Saha B, Ray S, Dutta D, Gunewardena S, Yo o B, Pal A, Vivian JL, Larson M, Petroff M, Gallagher PG, Schulz V P, White KL, Golos TG, Behr B, Paul S. Altered subcellular localization of transcription factor TEAD4 regulates frst mammalian cell lineage commitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012; 109: 7362-7367.
32. Rodda DJ, Chew JL, Lim LH, Loh YH, Wang B, Ng HH, Robson P. Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 24731-24737.
33. Itoh N, Ornitz DM. Evolution of the Fgf and Fgfr gene families. Trends in Genetics 2004; 20: 563-569.
34. Powers CJ, McLeskey S W, Wellstein A. Fibroblast growth factors,their receptors and signaling. Endocrine-Related Cancer 2000; 7: 165-197.
35. Niswander L, Martin GR. Fgf-4 expression during gastrulation, myogenesis, limb and tooth development in the mouse. Development 1992; 114: 755-768.
36. Rappolee DA, Basilico C, Patel Y, Werb Z. Expression and function of FGF-4 in peri-implantation development in mouse embryos. Development 1994; 120: 2259-2269.
37. Allen BL, Filla MS, Rapraeger AC. Role of heparan sulfate as a tissue-specific regulator of FGF-4 and FGF receptor recognition. J Cell Biol 2001; 155: 845-858.
38. Schlessinger J, Plotnikov AN, Ibrahimi OA, Eliseenkova AV, Ye h BK, Yayon A, Lin-hardt RJ, Mohammadi M. Crystal structure of a ternary FGF-FGFR-heparin complex reveals a dual role for heparin in FGFR binding and dimerization. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 743-750.