Tracking Restorative Components: Patterns in Eye Movements as a Consequence of a Restorative Rating Task

Landscape Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 101-116

  Nordh, Helena ^a   Hagerhall, Caroline M ^b   Holmqvist, Kenneth ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; landscape architecture; pocket park; restoration; vision

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PARK MANAGEMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN RENEWAL;

EID: 84876547738     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2012.691468     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berto, R., Massaccesi, S. and Pasini, M. 2008. Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (2): 185-191.
2. De Lucio, J. V., Mohamadian, M., Ruiz, J. P., Banayas, J. and Bernaldez, F. G. 1996. Visual landscape exploration as revealed by eye movement tracking. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34 (2): 135-142.
3. Deubel, H. and Schneider, W. 1996. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36 (12): 1827-1837.
4. Duchowski, A. T. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and PracticeLondon
5. Foulsham, T., Barton, J. J. S., Kingstone, A., Dewhurst, R. and Underwood, G. 2009. Fixation and saliency during search of natural scenes: The case of visual agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 47 (8-9): 1994-2003.
6. Gratzer, M. A. and McDowell, R. D. Adaptation of an eye movement recorder to esthetic environmental mensuration. Storrs Agricultural Experimental Station, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, The University of Connecticut.
7. Henderson, J. M. 2003. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (11): 498-504.
8. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreria, F. 2004. " Scene perception for psycholinguists ". In The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World, Edited by: Henderson, J. M. and Ferreria, F. NewYork: Psychology Press.
9. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S. and Mack, M. 2007. " Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes ". In Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, Edited by: Van Gompel, R. P. G., Fischer, M. H., Murray, W. S. and Hill, R. L. Oxford: Elsevier.
10. Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A. and Knotts, D. J. 1997. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17 (2): 165-171.
11. Herzog, T. R., Colleen, Maguire, P. and Nebel, M. B. 2003. Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23 (2): 159-171.
12. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Halszka, J. and van de Weijer, J. 2011. Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures, Lund: Oxford University Press.
13. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Elmqvist, T., Frith, M., Gordon, C., Greening, K. L. and Handley, J., Haworth, S., Kazmierczak, A. E., Johnston, M., Korpela, K., Moretti, M., Niemelä, J., Pauleit, S., Roe, M. H., Sadler, J. P. & Ward Thompson, C. 2009. Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8 (2): 65-75.
14. Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kaplan, S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15 (3): 169-183.
16. Keul, A. G., Hutzler, F., Frauscher, G. and Voigt, A. 2005. " Architrack-Evaluating architectural preferences via eyetracker ". In Designing Social Innovation: Planning, Edited by: Martens, B. and Keul, A. G. Building, Evaluating Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
17. Nilsson, K., Sangster, M., Gallis, C., Hartig, T., de Vries, S., Seeland, K. and Schipperijn, J. 2011. Forests, Trees and Human Health, Dordrecht: Springer Science, Business Media B.V.
18. Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M. and Fry, G. 2009. Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8: 225-235.
19. Parkhurst, D., Law, K. and Niebur, E. 2002. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42: 107-123.
20. Peron, E., Berto, R. and Purcell, T. 2002. Restorativeness, preference and the perceived naturalness of places. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 3 (1): 19-34.
21. Pylyshyn, Z. 1999. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 341-423.
22. Staats, H., Kieviet, A. and Hartig, T. 2003. Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23 (2): 147-158.
23. Stamps, A. E. 1999. Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14: 155-175.
24. Tatler, B. W. 2007. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision, 7 (14): 1-17.
25. Walther, D. and Koch, C. 2006. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks, 19 (9): 1395-1408.
26. Wenger, W. D. and Videbeck, R. 1969. Eye pupillary measurement of aesthetic responses to forest scenes. Journal of Leisure Research, 1 (2): 149-161.
27. Yarbus, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision, New York: Plenum Press.